Case law

State ex rel. Brennan v. Walbridge

62 Mo. App. 162 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1895

Smith, 101 Mo. 174 ; Hannibal & St, Joseph Railroad Co. v. State Board of Equalisation, 64 Mo. 308 . … State ex rel. v. Brown, 57 Mo. App. 199 ; State ex rel. v. City of St. Louis, 90 Mo. 19 ; Charter of St. Louis, art. 4, sec. 5.

Strother v. Kansas City Milling Co.

261 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1914

For example: Hollweg v. Telephone Co., 195 Mo. l. c. 156 et seq., and cases cited: Russ v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 45 ; Burkard v. Rope Co., 217 Mo. l. c. 480 et seq.; Bien v. Transit Co., 108 Mo. App. 399 ; Dayharsh v. … .; Miller v. Railroad, 109 Mo. l. c. 356 et seq.; • McIntyre v. Tebbetts, 257 Mo. 117 .

McFarland v. Trame

436 S.W.3d 654 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2014

Plaintiff claims the trial court erred in: (1) granting Defendants Trame and Kilo, Flynn, Billingsley, Trame & Brown, P.C.

Hillig v. City of St. Louis

337 Mo. 291 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 10, 1935

The challenged Ordinance No. 40179 was duly enacted by the board of aldermen of the city of St. Louis and was approved by the mayor on November 9, 1933. … [Curtice v. Schmidt, 202 Mo. 703 , 101 S. W. 61 ; Shoenberg v. Field, 95 Mo. App. 241 , 68 S. W. 945 ; St. Louis Quarry & Construction Co. v. Von Versen, 81 Mo. App. 519 ; St. Louis Quarry & Construction Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Holman v. Trimble

316 Mo. 1041 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1927

See also State ex rel. v. Meeker, 182 Ind. 240 , 105 N. E. 906 ; City of Paducah v. Board, 146 Ky. 636 , 143 S. W. 1 ; Lovelady v. Loveman, 191 Ala. 96 , 68 So. 48 ; Jobe v. Caldwell & Drake, 93 Ark. 503 , 125 S. … In State ex rel. v. Brown, 72 Mo. App. 651 , the Sheriff of the City of St. Louis was allowed per diem compensation for himself and his deputies.

Town of Canton v. Ligon

71 Mo. App. 407 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1897

Harrison v. … Louis v. Knox, 74 Mo. 79 ; City of DeSoto v. Brown, 44 Mo. App. 148 ; City of St. Louis v. Weitzel, 130 Mo. 600 .

Smith v. Normandy School District

734 S.W.2d 943 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1987

Rose v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, 397 S.W.2d 570, 577 (Mo.1965). … Mills v. Federal Soldiers Home, 549 S.W.2d 862, 868 (Mo. banc 1977). The issue has not been preserved. See, Brown v. Weir, 675 S.W.2d 135, 139 (Mo.App.1984).

Thompson v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

244 S.W.3d 180 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2007

During the course of this appeal, State Board of Registration For The Healing Arts v. William D. … See Dorman v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 62 S.W.3d 446, 448 (Mo.App.2001).

State of Missouri, ex rel. Jacqueice Wynn, Relator v. Honorable Scott Alan Lipke, Circuit Judge

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2025

Valentine v. Orr, 366 S.W.3d 534, 538 (Mo. banc 2012). … Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006) (“[o]nce 120 days passed and the trial court failed to hold a hearing, the trial court was required to place Mertens on probation”).

Southwest Regional Joint Board of the Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Union v. Barcus

860 S.W.2d 29 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 1993

In ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. … The refusal of the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board to issue a complaint does not act as res judicata, and no collateral estoppel effect attaches to such refusal. Warehousemen’s Local # 206 v.

T. E. Law & Co. v. Paxton

117 Mo. App. 541 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1906

[Collier v. Swinney, 16 Mo. 484 ; Taylor v. Steamboat, 20 Mo. 261 ; Davis v. Smith, 15 Mo. 467 .]” … We have been cited, in support of plaintiffs’ view, to the case of Thompson v. Brown, 106 Iowa 367 .

State ex rel. Von Stade v. Taylor

220 Mo. 618 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1909

Francis, 88 Mo. 557 , and Ex parte Arnold, 128 Mo. 256 , and State ex rel. v. Spencer, 164 Mo. 23 ; Windes v. Nelson, 159 Mo. 76 ; State ex rel. v. Board of Public Schools, 112 Mo. 213 ; Montgomery v. … Cicott, 16 Mich. 283 , and the Supreme Court of California in Ex parte Brown, 97 Cal. 83 .

Opinion No. 178-76 (1976)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1976

State Representative, District 119 1006 Fairmont Boulevard Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Dear Representative Strong: This official opinion is issued in response to your request for a ruling on the following question: "The Boards … Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337 , 83 L.Ed. 208 , 59 S.Ct. 232 (1938); Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , 74 S.Ct. 686 (1954).

State v. Garrett

627 S.W.2d 635 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1982

Carter v. Jury Commission, 396 U.S. 320, 332 , 90 S.Ct. 518, 524 , 24 L.Ed.2d 549 (1970); Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 474 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 416 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). The legislature by statute has directed that in St. … A similar problem and consistent result may be found in Brown v. Bryan, 419 S.W.2d 62 (Mo.1967).

Wilson v. Purl

148 Mo. 449 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 7, 1899

Brown and George P. … on October 4, 1881; but unfortunately for defendant, in courts where things practiced are considered, such a mental inclosure, built in the town offices of a land grabber is not an adequate substitute for boards, barbed

State ex rel. Board of Regents of Southwest Missouri State University v. Bonacker

765 S.W.2d 341 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1989

The Board’s position is supported by Frohoff v. … Milham v. Rickhoff 633 S.W.2d 733 (Mo. banc 1982), a mandamus action arising from a suit against the Board of Curators of the University of Missouri and other defendants, the Supreme Court of Missouri, citing Todd v.

Deckard v. Chairman of the State Division of Parole

471 S.W.2d 480 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 11, 1971

See Bullock v. Mississippi, 5th Cir., 404 F.2d 75 and cases cited and also citations in Brown v. State, Mo., 452 S.W.2d 176 . The principle was established by Ponzi v. … Since the time of State v.

State v. King

747 S.W.2d 264 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1988

State v. Dixon, 716 S.W.2d 815, 818 (Mo.App.1986); State v. Brown, 716 S.W.2d 6, 7 (Mo.App.1986). … State v. Brown, 665 S.W.2d 945, 958 (Mo.App.1984). The appellate court must determine only whether there was sufficient evidence from which reasonable persons could have found the defendant guilty as charged. State v.

Missouri Township in Chariton County v. Farmers Bank of Forest Green

328 Mo. 868 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 1, 1931

[Brown v. Irving-Pitt Mfg. Co., 292 S.W. 1023 .] The finding of facts made by the trial court, as above quoted, is supported by the greater weight of the evidence. … The only case cited in the briefs, by appellant and respondent, in point on the facts presented, is Hartford v. American National Bank, 49 Conn. 539 . This case is cited in appellant's reply brief.

Schwartz v. Board of Adjustment of the City of St. Louis

906 S.W.2d 413 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1995

On this appeal, this court reviews the decision of the Board and not the judgment of the circuit court. Drury Displays, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of the City of St. Louis, 832 S.W.2d 330, 331 [1, 2] (Mo.App.1992). … In deciding that Schwartz was not entitled to a variance, the Board failed to pass on the question of whether or not Schwartz was entitled to a certificate of occupancy by reason of his nonconforming use. In State v.