Case law

De Mars v. Heathman

132 Or. 609 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1930

This view of the law is in accord with the holdings of the court in several States: Capen v. Hall, 21 R. I. 364 ( 43 Atl. 847 ); Gleason v. Boehm, 58 N. J. Law 475 ( 34 Atl. 886 , 32 L. R. A. 645); Hilsenbeck v. … E. 580 ); Brugher v. Buchtenkirch, 167 N. Y. 153 ( 60 N. E. 420 ); Halpin v. Townsend, 2 City Ct. R. (N. Y.), affirmed 107 N. Y. 683 ( 14 N. E. 611 ).” See, also, Jackson v. Grayson, 13 Pa. Dist. R. 467, and Brown v.

Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

10 Or. Tax 518 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 14, 1987

Defendant’s citation of Communication Satellite Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 156 Cal App 3d 726, 203 Cal Rptr 779 (1984), which was an income tax case, is likewise of little benefit in this case. … Co. v.

Rawlins v. Bohy

125 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1993

(Emphasis supplied.) *161 Relying on Magee v. SAIF, 48 Or App 439 , 617 P2d 295 , rev den 290 Or 211 (1980); Brown v. SAIF, 43 Or App 447 , 602 P2d 1151 (1979), rev den 288 Or 335 (1980); and Rosencrantz v. … In Rosencrantz v.

State v. Hermach

53 Or. App. 412 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 1981

Rick then departed the residence without the brown paper bag. … This is the area where all passengers must enter prior to boarding any commercial aircraft.

State v. Farley

301 Or. 668 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1986

State v. Brown, supra, 262 Or at 448 . … In this case, defendant’s conduct was a single act even more than the conduct in State v. Brown.

Ragnone v. Belo Corp.

131 F. Supp. 2d 1189 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 25, 2001

The Board held that pilots were not exempt under the regulations. Id. I agree with the Board that the analysis in Paul is incorrect. … Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or. 597 , 588 P.2d 1087 (1978) (discharged for filing a workers compensation claim).

In Re Rights to Use of Waters of Silvies River

115 Or. 27 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1924

The opinion of Hough v. … Co. v. Empire Co., 181 Fed. 1011 ; Thomas v. Giraud, 6 Colo. 530, 533 ; Larimer County R. Co. v. People, 8 Colo. 614 ( 9 Pac. 794 ). In Utt v.

Williams v. Seufert Bros.

96 Or. 163 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1920

Brown, Attorney General, contra. Department 2. Bean, J. … Justice Johns in Holmes v.

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Thorp

296 Or. 666 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1984

Compare In re Brown, 211 Or 121, 129, 559 P2d 884 (1977); In re Boivin, 271 Or 419, 427-28 , 533 P2d 171 (1975).” (Emphasis in original.) … The complaint in the case of Bert Wells v. Miles and Hiatt was filed in March, 1980. The cross claim prepared by Thorp was served in June, 1980.

Marks v. McKENZIE HS FACT-FINDING TEAM

319 Or. 451 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1994

Brown, of Enfield, Guimond, Brown & Collins, Salem, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review. Edmund J. Spiney, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents on review. Philip Schradle, Asst. Atty. … For example, in Board of Trustees v. Freedom of Info.

King v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

61 Or. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 1982

See Gayle v. Browder, 352 US 903 , 77 S Ct 145 , 1 L Ed 2d 114 (1956) citing Brown v. … See Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597, 610 , 588 P2d 1087 (1978), and cases cited therein.

Portland Ass'n of Teachers v. Portland School District No. 1

55 Or. App. 236 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1981

This case is before us for judicial review of a decision of the Employment Relations Board (ERB). … Dist. v. ERB, 27 Or App 285 , 555 P2d 1269 (1976), rev den (1977), and Ostrer v. Pine Eagle School Dist., 40 Or App 265 , 594 P2d 1296 (1979). We direct respondent to N. Clackamas Sch. Dist. v. Clackamas Educ.

State v. Nix

7 Or. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1971

State v. Lamphere, 233 Or 330 , 378 P2d 706 (1963); State v. Gardner, 231 Or 193 , 372 P2d 783 (1962). … State v. Freeman, 4 Or App 627, 628 , 481 P2d 638 (1971); State v. Livingston, 2 Or App 587, 469 P2d 632 (1970).

Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility District

116 Or. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1992

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564, 577 , 92 S Ct 2701 , 33 L Ed 2d 548 (1972). She had the right “to prove the legitimacy of [her] claim of such entitlement.” Perry v. … Straub v. Oregon Electric Ry. Co., 163 Or 93, 96 , 94 P2d 681 (1939); Brown v. Insurance Company of North America, 93 Or App 355, 357 , 762 P2d 330 (1988), rev den 307 Or 303 (1989).

Marquam Investment Corp. v. Beers

47 Or. App. 711 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 11, 1980

In Marcus Brown Co. v. … Masters, 7 Or App 421, 434 , 490 P2d 1029 (1971); see also Thoren v. Builders Board, 21 Or App 148 , 533 P2d 1388 (1975); Marcus Brown Co. v. Feldman, supra.

State v. Muldrew

229 Or. App. 219 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 2009

State v. Langley, 314 Or 247, 249 , 839 P2d 692 (1992), adh’d to on recons, 318 Or 28 , 861 P2d 1012 (1993). … State v.

State v. Briggs

257 Or. App. 738 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 2013

State v. Marshall, 254 Or App 419, 421 , 295 P3d 128 (2013). … State v. Dunlap, 215 Or App 46, 53 , 168 P3d 295 (2007).

State v. Fernandez

375 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2026

Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 859 P2d 1143 (1993), and modified in State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 206 P3d 1042 (2009).” Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, 372 Or 225, 230, 548 P3d 817 (2024). … Brown, 372 Or at 232 n 3 (internal quotation marks omitted). 216 State v. Fernandez done in assigning an offense to a crime seriousness category.

Miller v. City of Woodburn

134 Or. 536 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1930

These filtration beds were constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications provided by the State Board of Health. … Rossman, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Roach v. Jackson County

151 Or. App. 33 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 1997

State ex rel Cox v. Davidson Ind., 291 Or 839, 851 , 635 P2d 630 (1981). Also, plaintiffs reliance on ORS 609.090(2) is misplaced. … For the above reasons, the trial court did not err in affirming the Board’s order.