Case law

Hannington v. Weinberger

393 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1975

Moreover, it misses the point made by Board of Regents v. … Like Brown v. Weinberger, Ryan v. Shea (Civ.

Parkview Community Hospital Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

664 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 16, 2016

Management, LLC v. … “On questions regarding representation, we accord the Board an especially wide degree of discretion.” U-Haul Co. of Nevada v. NLRB, 490 F.3d 957, 961 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting Canadian American Oil Co. v.

Vhs Acquisition Subsidiary Number 7, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 22, 2024

That union filed a formal complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). Id. … Co. v. United States, 272 U.S. 658, 672 (1926).

Central States Drivers Council v. National Labor Relations Board

267 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1959

The evidence relied upon by the Board was in large part circumstantial. … -C.I.O. v. N.L.R.B., 104 U.S.App.

Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board

262 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 1958

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Civil Aeronautics Board entered after the Board had completed proceedings undertaken as a result of our order of remand in Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. … We think the Board adequately complied with our order.

1215 CT, LLC t/a Rosebar Lounge v. DC Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

213 A.3d 605 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2019

Varela v. Hi-Lo Powered Stirrups, Inc., 424 A.2d 61, 64-65 (D.C. 1980) (en banc) (quoting United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95, 102-03 (1897)). … Harrison v. N. Tr. Co., 317 U.S. 476, 479 (1943) (internal quotation marks omitted).

JOEL CASTON v. UNITED STATES

146 A.3d 1082 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2016

Bell v. … Walsh v.

Brewery & Beverage Drivers & Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

257 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 1958

We think it sufficient to say that in our view, on the facts of this case, the Board’s conclusion appears arbitrary. Cf. Packard Motor Car Co. v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 1939, 306 U.S. 292 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , 83 L.Ed. 660 ; Zall v.

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

300 F.2d 904 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1962

Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm., 219 U.S. 498, 515 , 31 S.Ct. 279 , 55 L.Ed. 310 . … But see American Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, supra.

Weber v. Hurtgen

297 F. Supp. 2d 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2003

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 .

John H. Vandermolen v. John C. Stetson, Secretary of the Air Force

571 F.2d 617 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1977

Mogavero v. McLucas, 543 F.2d 1081, 1085 (4th Cir. 1975); Geiger v. Brown, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 132, 135 , 419 F.2d 714, 717-19 (1969); Powell v. … United States, 40 F. 441, 442-43 (C.C.D.Mass.1889); Wolak v. United States, 366 F.Supp. 1106, 1110 (D.Conn. 1973); Brown v.

Eichberg v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

285 F. 928 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1922

Eichberg, trading as National Timber Company, and the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation. … Davis v. Schwartz, 155 U. S. 631 , 15 Sup. Ct. 237, 39 L. Ed. 289 .

International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board

180 F. Supp. 2d 188 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 2002

International Ass’n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Bd. (Machinists I), 425 F.2d 527, 537 (D.C.Cir.1970); see also Local 808 v. … The defendants answer in the negative, relying upon Dalton v.

Morris v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

701 A.2d 364 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1997

In Joseph v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine, 587 A.2d 1085 (D.C.1991), we recognized that we do not do so in a vacuum. … Morris’s secondary argument, citing *369 Lewis v.

Glaziers' Local No. 558 v. National Labor Relations Board

408 F.2d 197 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1969

United States v. L.A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33 , 73 S.Ct. 67 , 97 L.Ed. 54 (1952) ; Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. SEG, supra note 11 ; Democrat Printing Co. v. … United States v. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., supra note 12, at 37.

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

530 A.2d 1163 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1987

Draude v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 527 A.2d 1242, 1250 (D.C.1987) (citations omitted). We agree with the Citizens Association, however, that the Board’s analysis cannot withstand scrutiny. … Under the circumstances, any decision bearing on the merits of how the Board should handle such an application “would serve merely as an advisory opinion.” Ford v. Turner, 531 A.2d 233 , - (D.C.1987) (quoting Banks v.

United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

430 F.2d 519 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1970

After the Supreme Court’s decision in N.L.R.B. v. … See, e. g., Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. N.L.R.B., 125 U.S.App.D.C. 275 , 371 F.2d 740 (1966). . See also Food Store Employees Union, Local No. 347 v. N.L.R.B., U.S.App.D.C.

Paul Lindsay v. National Transportation Safety Board Federal Aviation Administration

47 F.3d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1995

The Supreme Court so held in Bogk v. … See, e.g., Alston v. Bowins, 733 F.2d 161, 163-64 (D.C.Cir.1984). We have not considered whether all of the Board’s previous decisions are consistent with this approach.

Fraternal Order of Police MPD Labor Committee v. Public Employee Relations Board

516 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1986

It is essential that individuals be completely free to petition the Board for redress of such grievances. See N.L.R.B. v. … Stokes v. District of Columbia, supra, 502 A.2d at 1010 ; Barry v. Wilson, 448 A.2d 244, 246 (D.C.1982); Kegley v.

Squire v. Fulwood

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 26, 2013

The District of Columbia Board of Parole (“Parole Board”) paroled Petitioner on April 3, 1979; he was to remain under supervision of the Parole Board until January 28, 1989. … Hill v. Johnston, 750 F. Supp. 2d 103, 105-06 (D.D.C. 2010); see also Sutherland v. McCall, 709 F.2d 730, 732 (D.C.