Case law

Villanueva v. Liberty Acquisitions Servicing, LLC

319 F.R.D. 307 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 13, 2017

E.g., Jordan v. … See, e.g., Cameron v.

State v. Burroughs

130 Or. 480 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1929

*482 BROWN, J. The defendant was accused of practicing medicine without a license. The charging part of the indictment reads: “The said Albert 0. Burroughs, on the first day of March, A. … There was no error in this ruling: State v. Humphrey, 63 Or. 540 ( 128 Pac. 824 ), and local citations there noted; State v. Laundy, 103 Or. 443 ( 204 Pac. 958 , 206 Pac. 290 ); State v.

Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace, Health, & Hospital Services v. Russell

318 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1994

The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirmed. Aetna and Russell sought judicial review in the Court of Appeals. … Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). As a general proposition, a third party’s right to enforce a contractual promise in its favor depends on the intention of the parties to the contract.

Forman v. Clatsop County

297 Or. 129 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1984

Forman, Petitioners On Review, v. CLATSOP COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon; Sports Acres, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; Milton O. Brown and Raymond Kittleson, Respondents On Review. … Decision turned on whether a board's action was a "rule." The Court of Appeals held that it was not and dismissed the petition for judicial review. Graziano v. City Council of Canby, 35 Or.

Chapman v. First Nat. Bank

72 Or. 492 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1914

The money being on deposit at the time •of its appropriation by the president, the board of directors, as the “mind” of the corporation, having a general superintendency over and the management of the business affairs and … If the essential facts are either suppressed or unknown, the ratification is treated as invalid, because founded in mistake or fraud: Valley Bank of Phoenix v. Brown, 9 Ariz. 311 ( 83 Pac. 362 ); Owings v.

Pennoyer v. Wadhams

11 L.R.A. 210 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1891

In Schmidt v. … C. 4 Iowa, 252 ; Attorney-General v. Chester, 1 Brown’s Ch. 389; 2 Perry on Trusts, §§ 730, 736; Vidal v. Girard, 2 How. 126 ; Johnson v. Mayne, 4 Iowa, 180 ; Cumming v. Trustees, 64 Ga. 105 .

Monahan v. State Industrial Accident Commission

139 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1932

Rockey for further consideration of plaintiff’s claim; June 9,1931, the same individual stated in a letter addressed to the plaintiff: “After going into the matter the Board feels that they would not be justified in reopening … J., Rand, Brown, Kelly and Campbell, ,TJ., concur. Belt, J., absent.

Nava v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 12, 2024

Nava v. … “Whether an insurer has a legitimate doubt or acts unreasonably must ‘be considered in the light of all the evidence available to the insurer.’ ” Snyder, 287 Or App at 367 (quoting Brown v.

State v. T. W. (In re T. W.)

291 Or. App. 679 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 2018

While appellant was in the San Diego area, he placed a call to Governor Brown's constituent office and left the following voicemail: "This message is for Governor Kate Brown. … See State v. D. R. K., 216 Or.

Bollaert v. Witter

101 Or. App. 654 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 23, 1990

Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). Assault is defined in Cook v. … In Hall v. The May Dept.

Rossolo v. Multnomah County Elections Division

272 Or. App. 572 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 29, 2015

Thus, in Long v. … See also Rose v.

Katz v. Patterson

135 Or. 449 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1930

BROWN, J. The plaintiffs have brought this suit to enjoin the defendants constituting the state land board from leasing to defendant Charles R. … See, also, the recent case of State v.

Shockey v. City of Portland

313 Or. 414 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1992

See Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or [597], 611[, 588 P2d 1087 (1978)].” Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 298 Or 76, 90-91 , 689 P2d 1292 (1984). … The first important case was Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 US 563 , 88 S Ct 1731 , 20 L Ed 2d 811 (1968).

Oregon State Police Officers Ass'n v. State

94 Or. App. 478 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1988

See Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982). The difficulty with defendants’ argument goes beyond the justiciability issue and extends to the merits. … See Lofft v. State Board of Higher Ed., 89 Or App 614 , 750 P2d 515 (1988). Affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal. 1 The trial court noted that the guidelines are inconsistent with the statute.

Denison v. Oregon

211 F.R.D. 408 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 13, 2002

Id. at 621 , citing Kelly v. … Brown (“Brown Aff’) who has reviewed the requested materials.

Peters v. Lieuallen

568 F. Supp. 261 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 1, 1983

the Chancellor of the Board. … Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, -U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1482 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983).

Spencer v. School District No. 1

121 Or. 511 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1927

In Coleman v. … J., and Brown and McBride, JJ., concur.

Fields v. Jantec, Inc.

317 Or. 432 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1993

McGarrah v. … See Hull v.

Orsen Et Ux. v. Siegle

170 Or. 153 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1942

Willamete Grocery Co. v. Skiff, 118 Or. 685, 691 , 248 P. 143 ; Ball v. Danton, 64 Or. 184, 195 , 129 P. 1032 ; Garnier v. Wheeler, 40 Or. 198, 200 , 66 P. 812 . … Brown, 7 Me. 421 , 22 Am. Dec. 208 ; Denigan v. San Francisco Savings Union, 127 Cal. 142 , 59 P. 390 , 78 Am. St. Rep. 35 ; Semper v. Coates, 93 Minn. 76 , 100 N. W. 662 ; and Supreme Lodge v.

Bellairs v. Beaverton School District

206 Or. App. 186 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 31, 2006

In Barnes v. … See City of Roseburg v.