Case law

First National Bank of Pauls Valley v. Crudup

656 P.2d 914 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1982

Green v. Board of Commissioners of Lincoln County, 126 Okl. 300 , 259 P. 635 [1927], State v. Worten, supra note 4. 7 . Palmer v. Crouch, Okl., 298 P.2d 1041, 1042 [1956]; Wass v. … Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Okl. Master Conservancy Dist., Okl., 464 P.2d 748, 755 [1969], 9 . H.E. Leonhardt Lumber Co. v. Ed Wamble Distributing Co., supra note 7; Melton v.

Hildebrandt v. State

19 Okla. Crim. 30 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1920

Graham v. W. Va., 224 U. S. 616 , 32 Sup. Ct. 583, 56 L. Ed. 917 ; State v. Findling, 123 Minn. 413 , 144 N. W. 142 , 49 L. R. A. (N. S.) 449; People v. Stanley, 47 Cal. 113 , 17 Am. Rep. 401 ; Kelley v. … Brown v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 Pac. 359 .

Hudgins v. Foster

131 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1928

The case of Burks v. … Mill v.

Oklahoma v. INTERN. ASS'N OF FIRE FIGHTERS

254 P.3d 678 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 2011

Brown v. Marker, 1965 OK 172, ¶ 19 , 410 P.2d 61, 66 ; State ex rel. Murphy v. Boudreau, 1982 OK 117, ¶ 12 , 653 P.2d 531, 533 . … City of Hugo v. State ex rel. Public Employees Relations Bd., 1994 OK 134, ¶ 15 , 886 P.2d 485, 492 . That reasoning applies to an interest arbitration board as well.

State Ex Rel. Burns v. Steely

600 P.2d 367 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1979

Brown, 456 F.2d 18 (10th Cir. 1972), and Schaffer v. Green, Okl.Cr., 496 P.2d 375 (1972). … Boswell, 330 F.Supp. 615 (M.D.Ala., N.D.1971). 3 .The holding in Porter, supra, was recognized by the Supreme Court in Board of Education v. Board of Com'rs., 14 Okl. 322 , 78 P. 455 (1904); in Olson v.

Bates v. Old Mac Coal Co.

271 P.2d 315 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1954

See Smith v. S. Kaufman & Co., supra; Smith v. Board of Com’rs of Roger County, 26 Okl. 819 , 110 P. 669 ; Hoover v. Board of Com’rs of Garvin County, supra. … Plaintiffs call attention to our decision in Brown v.

Howard v. Davis

40 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1913

That the house on the premises was unoccupied, and Wilson boarded up the windows and nailed up the door. That on the 6th day of January, 1911, Hardy Grant served notice on Wilson to vacate the premises. … (Citing Campbell v. Coonradt, 22 Kan. 704 ; Conaway v. Gore, 27 Kan. 127 ; Burdette v. Corgan, 27 Kan. 275 ; Emsley v. Bennett, 37 Iowa, 15 ). In the case of Brown v. Feagins, 37 Neb. 256 , 55 N.

RIDING IN v. Cheatham

173 P.3d 102 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 2007

Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶ 4 , 85 P.3d 841, 844 . The burden is on the moving party to show the legal insufficiency of the petition. Id. … T6 Pursuant to the holding in Pinson v.

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 12 v. STATE

565 P.3d 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 2024

Board of Education of City of Oklahoma City v. … Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶10 , 85 P.3d 841, 845-46 (words in a statute are to be construed according to their plain and ordinary meaning unless it is clear the legislature intended a different meaning). 42 Okla. Const. Art.

Jones v. Winters

369 P.2d 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1961

See Jones v. Freeman et al., 193 Okl. 554 , 146 P.2d 564 ; Jones v. Cordell, Secy. et al., 197 Okl. 61 , 168 P.2d 130 ; and Romang v. Cordell, 206 Okl. 369 , 243 P.2d 677 . In Jones v. … Under the authority of Jones v. Freeman and Romang v.

Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 4, 2025

See Parker v. Dowling, 664 Fed. … See Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, Case No. CIV-20-981-C, 2021 WL 1137963, at *2 (W.D. Okla. Jan. 28, 2021) (quoting Straley v.

City of Tulsa v. State Industrial Commission

189 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1941

City of Duncan v. Ray, 164 Okla. 205 , 23 P. 2d 694 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. 2d 141 ; Spivey & McGill v. Nixon, 163 Okla. 278 , 21 P. 2d 1049 ; Hardy Sanitarium v. … Hardy Sanitarium v. De Hart, supra. In the case of Klein v.

School Dist. No. 25 v. Hodge

199 Okla. 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1947

Murphy, State Labor Com’r, et al., 186 Okla. 714 , 100 P.2d 453 ; Brown v. State Election Board et al. (Foley, Intervener), 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 . … In Excise Board of Washita County v.

Miles v. Rogers County Board of Commissioners

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 16, 2025

See United Int'l Holdings v. … (quoting Brown v. Creek Cnty. ex rel. Creek Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 164 P.3d 1073, 1075 (Okla. 2007)). Turn Key argues that 12 Okla. Stat. § 95(A)(11) bars Plaintiff's state law claims (Dkt.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1998

Dear Senator Brown, ¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Opinion asking, in effect, the following questions: 1. … Board Of Appeals, 246 N.Y.S.2d 506 , 508 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. 1964) (outdoor swimming pool not a "building" for zoning purposes); Stevenson v.

Schuman v. Campbell

183 Okla. 553 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1938

. * * *” In Massey v. … Morris v. Waldrop (1925, Ala.) 105 So. 172 . See. also, Landry v. Bedou (1933, Miss.) 147 So. 299 , and State v. Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. (1935) 172 Okla. 216 . 45 P.2d 488 .

Crews v. Garber

188 Okla. 570 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1941

Co. v. Harris’ Estate, 111 Fed. 38 ; Allen v. Luke et al., 163 Fed. 1018 ; Williams v. Brady, 232 Fed. 740 . What, then, were the duties of the defendant as such director? … The view urged by Garber that bank directors are ordinarily liable only to the bank, and not to its creditors, is adhered to in South Carolina, Kentucky, and Tennessee (Brown v. Hammett, 133 S. C. 446, 131 S.

Isaacs v. Oklahoma City

437 P.2d 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 27, 1966

V. Garret. … See Rush v. Brown, 187 Okl. 97 , 101 P.2d 262 , and also in the case of Harris v. State, ex rel.

Bd. of Com'rs, Adair Cty. v. Morris Disinfecting Co.

148 Okla. 127 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1931

The board of county commissioners is designated purchasing agent of the county by statute. Section 5793, C. O. S. 1921. It alone is authorized to enter into contracts for and in behalf of the county. Tulsa County v. … Tulsa Camera Record Co., 103 Okla. 35 , 228 Pac. 1103 ; Edelman v. Bd. of Com’rs of LeFlore County, 110 Okla. 172 , 257 Pac. 94 ; News-Dispatch Ptg. Co. v. LeFlore County, 112 Okla. 138 , 240 Pac. 64 .

Leflore County Ex. Bd. v. St. L.-S. F. Ry.

185 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

of Stephens County v. … It is contended that the judgments were taken under the rules of law announced in the case of Smartt v.