Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

1.37s

  • Grosso v. Board of Adjustment of Millburn Twp.

    137 N.J.L. 630 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 10, 1948

    On the ensuing March 7th, at the instance of the local planning board, the Board of Adjustment continued the hearing of the application to March 28th, following; and there were continuances from time to time, one at the instance … Ed. 394 ; Eubank v. Richmond, 2 26 U. S. 148 ; 33 S. Ct. 76 ; 57 L. Ed. 156 ; Noble State Bank v. Haskell, 219 U. S. 104 ; 31 S. Ct. 186 ; 55 L. Ed. 112 ; Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365 ; 47 S.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Passaic County Board of Taxation v. Municipal Council

    110 N.J. 174 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State ex rel. McCarter v. Board of Education

    73 N.J.L. 301 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1906

    Smith v. Hightstown, 42 Vroom 536 . Bradley Beach was therefore a legally-existing borough when the School act of October 19th, 1903, was passed. Pamph. L. 1904, p. 5. … This act, it is contended, is unconstitutional, and I am quite at a loss to see how it can be sustained, even under the theory suggested in Howe v. Board of Education, 43 Vroom 158 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Arroyo v. Somerset County Board of Social Services

    97 N.J. 660 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 2, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Silver Enterprises, Inc. v. Rent Leveling Control Board

    88 N.J. 478 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 19, 1981

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • AT & T Communications v. Board of Adjustment

    216 N.J. Super. 340 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1986

    As such, the board’s determination on this issue is not entitled to its usual presumption of validity. See Supermarkets Oil v. Zollinger, 126 N.J.Super. 505 (App.Div.1974); Trenkamp v. … of Chatham v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Universal Insurance v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    118 N.J.L. 538 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 31, 1937

    Newton Trust Co. v. Atwood, supra. It was merely one of the factors which the county board was duty bound to consider with all other factors in the cause. … Kenilworth v. State Board of Equalization of Taxes, 78 N. J. L. 302; 72 Atl. Rep. 966 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Seaside Home v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    98 N.J.L. 110 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 8, 1922

    The assessment was canceled by the Cape May county board of taxation. On appeal to the state board of taxes and assessment, the order of the county board, in canceling the assessment, was reversed. … The case is clearly distinguished from the cases of the Borough of Longport v. Bamberger, 91 N. J. L. 330, and Institute of Holy Angels v. Borough of Fort Lee, 80 Id. 545.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Bernards Twp. Education Ass'n

    77 N.J. 499 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 27, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Central Sussex Land Corp. v. Board of Adjustment

    75 N.J. 589 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 22, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Long Branch Education Ass'n v. Board of Education

    71 N.J. 515 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 23, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Board of Education v. Hamilton Township Education Ass'n

    69 N.J. 393 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Chevron Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    57 N.J. 238 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 1, 1970

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Zelko v. Municipal Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control

    33 N.J. 385 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1960

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Reppucci v. Board Chosen Freeholders, Hudson Co.

    130 N.J.L. 22 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 1, 1943

    The answer, in the negative, is to be found in a decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals in the recent case of Kobylarz v. Mercer, 130 N. J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Goldstein-Fineberg Co. v. State Board of Assessors

    83 N.J.L. 61 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 1912

    Knickerbocker Improvement Co. v. Board of Assessors, 45 Vroom 583 . .Plainly, the slock in question was not retired. … Knickerbocker Improvement Co. v. Board of Assessors, supra. See, also, Siegman v. Electric Vehicle Co., 2 Buch. 403 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Stevenson v. Atlantic City Real Estate Board

    103 N.J.L. 615 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1927

    The action is one of mandamus to compel the reinstatement of the relator, Stevenson, as a member of the real estate board. In awarding an alternative writ (3 N. J. Mis. … R. 11021 the Supreme Court found as a fact that the board, through its trustees or committee, expelled Stevenson without the preferring of any charges against him, and without a hearing (foot of page 1103).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pennyton Homes, Inc. v. Planning Board of Stanhope

    41 N.J. 578 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1964

    This land subdivision approval case involves a question not specifically passed upon in Levin v. Township of Livingston, 35 N. J. 500 (1961), and Hilton Acres v. Klein, 35 N. … A. 40:55-1.18: “The governing body or the planning board, as the case may be, may tentatively approve a plat showing new streets or roads or the resubdivision of land along a mapped street.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors

    89 N.J.L. 108 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1916

    So Chief *112 Justice Beasley, in effect, said in Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 49 N. J. L. 1. … C., 75 Id. 571; Long Dock Co. v. Board, 87 Id. 22.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Earruso v. Board of Health, E. Hanover Twp.

    120 N.J.L. 463 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1938

    Mitchell, v. Tolan, 33 N. J. L. 195; Jersey City v. Erwin, 59 Id. 282; reversed, sub nom. Erwin v. Jersey City, 60 Id. 141; Oliver v. Jersey City, 63 Id. 634; Lang v. Bayonne, 74 Id. 455; Harrison v. … Atlantic City v. Abbott, 73 N. J. L. 281; Wogish v. Board of Health of Moonachie, 114 Id. 261. See, also, 15 A. L. R. 301. The writ is accordingly dismissed, with costs.

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.