Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

1.84s

  • Hovey v. Sauer

    50 Mo. 301 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1872

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Gordon

    253 Mo. 510 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1913

    [State v. Spaugh, 200 Mo. 571 , l. c. 594; State v. Bell, 212 Mo. 111 ; State v. Collins, 181 Mo. 235 , l. c. 260.] … [State v. Griffen, 87 Mo. 608 ; State v. Allen, 174 Mo. 689 ; State v. Rasco, 239 Mo. 535 .]

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mosher v. Beirne

    237 F. Supp. 684 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 30, 1964

    McCabe v. Atchison T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 , 35 S.Ct. 69 , 59 L.Ed. 169 ; State of Mo. ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337 , 59 S.Ct. 232 , 83 L.Ed. 208 ; Brown v. … Deloach v. Rogers, 5 Cir., 268 F.2d 928 . Simmons v. Whittaker, supra.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Spradling v. SSM Health Care St. Louis

    313 S.W.3d 683 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 2010

    See Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Servs., Inc., 807 S.W.2d 503, 506 (Mo. banc 1991). 5 . In Fields v. … Brown v. Shaw, 129 S.W.3d 372, 373 (Mo. banc 2004).

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Davis v. Walden

    332 Mo. 680 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 20, 1933

    Van Raalte et al. v. Board of Equalization, 256 Mo. 455 , 461, 165 S.W. 1047 ; State ex rel. Johnson v. … Hamilton v. Brown, 172 Mo. 374 , 72 S.W. 640 , cited by appellants, is not in point.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Johnson

    81 Mo. 483 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1884

    As to the first of the above named objections to the instructions in McManus v. … In Brown v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Adams and Associates, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 8, 2020

    Doc 31-2 (Brown v. Adams & Associates, Cause No. 1222- CC11604 (Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Missouri) (Order dated June 20, 2019)). … See Dindinger v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State Ex Rel. Missouri State High School Activities Ass'n v. Schoenlaub

    507 S.W.2d 354 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1974

    In Brown v. … Athletic Ass’n v. Cox, [4], supra, Scott v. Kilpatrick, [4], supra, and Estay v. LaFourche Parish School Board, 230 So.2d 443 [13] (La.App.1969).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Haeussler Investment Company v. Bates

    306 Mo. 392 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1924

    [Malleable Casting Co. v. Prendergast Const. Co., 288 Mo. 1 . c. 220-221.] In Brown v. Phillips, 254 S. … This court has held just the contrary in the case of Brown v. Phillips, supra; also in Findley-Kehl Inv. Co. v. O’Connor, *413 256 S. W. 1 . c. 800.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Adtalem Global Education, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 9, 2019

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ROBBY BROWN … Chmieleski v. City Prods. Corp., 660 S.W.2d 275, 294 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983) (citing Sewell v. Ladd, 158 S.W .2d 752, 757 (Mo. Ct. App. 1942)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • The St. Louis Police Leadership Organization v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2015

    of Police, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 15 v. … See Derrick, Inc. v. Quigless, 408 S.W.3d 323, 326 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013). No reason exists why the City was not provided notice and an opportunity to defend, both here and in the circuit court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Johnson

    333 Mo. 1008 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 19, 1933

    They are, State v. Carlisle, 57 Mo. 102 ; State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 , 16 S.W. 406 ; State v. Wisdom, 119 Mo. 539 , 24 S.W. 1047 . … The instruction considered in the Brown case was not copied in the opinion.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • McCrainey v. Kansas City Missouri School District

    337 S.W.3d 746 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2011

    See Brown v. Lanrich, Inc., 950 S.W.2d 235 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). … However, the court in Brown cited no authority supporting its decision, and furthermore, its decision contradicts older Missouri ease law that has not been overruled. See, e.g., Stith v. St Louis Pub. Serv.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Mosconi v. Maroney

    191 Mo. 531 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1905

    App., the Court of Appeals, in State ex rel. v. Brown, 57 Mo. … [Laughlin v. Fairbanks, 8 Mo. 370 ; Wickham v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 .] And what the law will imply, is as much part and parcel of a legislative enactment, as though set forth in terms.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Reorganized School District R-2 of Newton County v. Robinson

    276 S.W.2d 235 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1955

    Keitel v. Harris, 353 Mo. 1043 , 186 S.W.2d 31, 33 (2)], the reported opinions reflect frequent references to such board as “a judicial tribunal” [State ex rel. School Dist. No. 1 v. … to the clerks of the interested districts [Brown & Moore v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Bank of Houston v. Kirkman

    156 Mo. App. 309 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 8, 1911

    Brown and Alfred H. … deed of trust of Brown’s was paid and. cancelled without Brown having any knowledge of defendants’ contract with Cummings.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Conner v. Herd

    452 S.W.2d 272 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1970

    It is true that a Board of Adjustment is solely an administrative body “without a vestige of legislative power.” Brown v. Beuc, Mo.App., 384 S.W.2d 845 . … Ass’n v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Day v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Division of the Board of Probation & Parole

    153 S.W.3d 350 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 2005

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Citizens for Safe Waste Management v. St. Louis County Air Pollution Control Appeal Board

    896 S.W.2d 643 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1995

    Louis County Air Pollution Appeal Board (Appeal Board), some individual members of that board, the county’s program manager for air pollution, and Halls Ferry Investments, Inc. (Operator). … Rich v. Rich, 871 S.W.2d 618 (Mo.App.1994); Paris v. Director of Revenue, 858 S.W.2d 829 (Mo. App.1993); State v. Eyberg, 671 S.W.2d 26 (Mo.App.1984).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. Waxman

    9 S.W.3d 601 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 2000

    Vinjamuri, 19 F.3d 1274 (8th Cir.1994) (affirming trial court’s order excluding evidence that defendant failed board exam); Jackson v. Buchman, 338 Ark. 467 , 996 S.W.2d 30 (1999) (same); Gipson v. … Brown, appellants’ expert, when he was contacted with regard to this case.

    Cited 91 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.