Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.30s
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2021
PER CURIAM: The Board of Professional Responsibility recommends that David H. … So ordered. 1 See, e.g., In re Brown, 80 A.3d 1043, 1044 (D.C. 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMarijuana Policy Project v. United States
304 F.3d 82 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 19, 2002
Marijuana Policy Project v. D.C. Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 191 F.Supp.2d 196, 216 (D.D.C. 2002). The court permanently enjoined the Board from refusing to certify the Initiative, and the United States now appeals. … In Skrzypczak v.
Cited 33 timesPublishedCitizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
323 A.2d 715 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1974
PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired: Brought into question when we first considered this case, Citizens Ass’n v. District of Columbia Alc. Bev. C. … D.C.Code 1973, § 1-1510; Citizens Ass’n v. District of Columbia Alc. Bev. C. Bd., D.C.App., 280 A.2d 309, 311 (1971). Order affirmed. 1 . Citizens Ass’n v. District of Columbia Alc. Bev. C. Bd., supra at 867.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLincoln Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
670 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 2, 1987
In Independent Bankers Ass’n of America v. … Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. E.P.A., 768 F.2d 385 , 389 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, American Methyl Cory. v. Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBentson Contracting Company v. National Labor Relations Board, (Two Cases)
941 F.2d 1262 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1991
NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251, 266 , 95 S.Ct. 959, 968 , 43 L.Ed.2d 171 (1975); Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers v. … We must therefore defer to the Board’s reasonable interpretation of section 10(b), as did the court of appeals in J. Ray McDermott & Co. v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedWal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
137 F. App'x 360 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 19, 2005
Shamrock Foods Co. v. NLRB, 346 F.3d 1130, 1132-33 (D.C.Cir.2003). The Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) decision, which was adopted by the Board, rests on a straightforward application of NLRB precedents. … Atlantic Steel Co., 245 N.L.R.B. 814 (1979); see Felix Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 1051 (D.C.Cir.2001).
Cited 1 timesPublishedMyer, III v. Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2025
Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). The Court must consider “a pro se litigant’s complaint ‘in light of’ all filings,” Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … James v. Hurson Assocs., Inc. v. Glickman, 229 F.3d 277, 284 (D.C. Cir. 2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
618 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 11, 1980
United States v. CAB, 511 F.2d 1315 , 1322 (D.C.Cir.1975). … Trans Alaska Pipeline Cases, 436 U.S. 631, 643 , 98 S.Ct. 2053, 2061 , 56 L.Ed. 591 (1978), quoting Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 1162, 1166 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965).
Cited 12 timesPublishedLegislative Study Club, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
359 A.2d 153 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1976
Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282, 286 (1974); Taylor v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230, 232 (1973). … Petitioner cites us to the recent Supreme Court case of N.L.R.B. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedVhs Acquisition Subsidiary Number 7, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2024
Saint Vincent claims that the Board’s pursuit of damages infringes upon its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. Id. at 19 (citing Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462, 489 (2011) and Sec. Exch. Comm’n v. … Saint Vincent’s beef with the Board is due to its conflict with the Union. In other words, the present constitutional claims “would not exist but for the underlying [Board charges].” Armco, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAir Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Civil Aeronautics Board
514 F.2d 834 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1975
ALPA declined to prosecute its petition to review following the opinion of our court in Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. CAB, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 494 F.2d 1118 (1974). … The Board objected to it.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCVS Albany, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
709 F. App'x 10 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 2017
) of Contracts § 203(a)); see Segar v. … See Hard Rock Holdings, LLC v. NLRB, 672 F.3d 1117, 1120-21 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Philip Morris Inc.
116 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2000
Currently, only one person sits on the board of both companies. Similarly, the overlap between the [BAT Ind.] and Brown & Williamson boards of directors has been minimal and currently no member sits on both boards. … (Neville, J.); State of Hawaii v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Civil No. 97-0441-01 (Haw.Cir.Cl.); State of Indiana v. Philip Morris, Inc., No. 49D07-9702-CT-000236 (Ind.Super. Ct.
Cited 187 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2025
Dep’t of Educ. v. Brown, 600 U.S. 551, 565 (2023) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 553(e)). R-CALF’s second theory of standing fares no better. … The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Department of Education v. Brown, 600 U.S. 551 (2023), provides significant guidance on this question.
Cited 0 timesPublishedInternational Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board
409 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 1976
National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943) and Railway Clerks v. … Non-contract Employees, 380 U.S. 650 , 85 S.Ct. 1192 , 14 L.Ed.2d 133 (1965) as well as the decision rendered by this circuit in International Ass’n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers v.
Cited 2 timesPublished393 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1975
Moreover, it misses the point made by Board of Regents v. … Like Brown v. Weinberger, Ryan v. Shea (Civ.
Cited 9 timesPublished800 Water Street, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
992 A.2d 1272 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 2010
See Odeniran v. Hanley Wood, LLC, 985 A.2d 421, 428 (D.C.2009) (interpreting unemployment compensation statute); Mayberry v. … See Allen v. Schultheiss, 981 A.2d 610 , 613 n. 3 (D.C.2009).
Cited 2 timesPublishedLocal No. 5, United Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
321 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1963
321 F.2d 366 LOCAL NO. 5, UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF the PLUMBING AND PIPE FITTING INDUSTRY OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … Local 1976, etc., Carpenters' Union v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedBurke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.
286 F.3d 513 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 2002
The Board responded to Burke’s opposition, arguing that: (1) several of Burke’s claims were not “adverse employment actions” and were therefore barred under the recently-issued decision in Brown v. … See Brown, 199 F.3d at 458 .
Cited 434 timesPublishedRetail Clerks International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
373 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1967
Grant Co. v. NLRB, 337 F.2d 447, 449 (7th Cir. 1964), the Board held that the mere request was a violation of the Act. … C. § 158(d), the Board has power to direct execution of the contract. H. J. Heinz Co. v. NLRB, 311 U.S. 514 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 (1941). 7 B.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna