Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.30s

  • In re David H. Miller

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2021

    PER CURIAM: The Board of Professional Responsibility recommends that David H. … So ordered. 1 See, e.g., In re Brown, 80 A.3d 1043, 1044 (D.C. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marijuana Policy Project v. United States

    304 F.3d 82 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 19, 2002

    Marijuana Policy Project v. D.C. Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 191 F.Supp.2d 196, 216 (D.D.C. 2002). The court permanently enjoined the Board from refusing to certify the Initiative, and the United States now appeals. … In Skrzypczak v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    323 A.2d 715 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1974

    PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired: Brought into question when we first considered this case, Citizens Ass’n v. District of Columbia Alc. Bev. C. … D.C.Code 1973, § 1-1510; Citizens Ass’n v. District of Columbia Alc. Bev. C. Bd., D.C.App., 280 A.2d 309, 311 (1971). Order affirmed. 1 . Citizens Ass’n v. District of Columbia Alc. Bev. C. Bd., supra at 867.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lincoln Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    670 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 2, 1987

    In Independent Bankers Ass’n of America v. … Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. E.P.A., 768 F.2d 385 , 389 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, American Methyl Cory. v. Motor Vehicle Mfrs.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bentson Contracting Company v. National Labor Relations Board, (Two Cases)

    941 F.2d 1262 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1991

    NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251, 266 , 95 S.Ct. 959, 968 , 43 L.Ed.2d 171 (1975); Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers v. … We must therefore defer to the Board’s reasonable interpretation of section 10(b), as did the court of appeals in J. Ray McDermott & Co. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    137 F. App'x 360 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 19, 2005

    Shamrock Foods Co. v. NLRB, 346 F.3d 1130, 1132-33 (D.C.Cir.2003). The Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) decision, which was adopted by the Board, rests on a straightforward application of NLRB precedents. … Atlantic Steel Co., 245 N.L.R.B. 814 (1979); see Felix Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 1051 (D.C.Cir.2001).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Myer, III v. Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2025

    Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). The Court must consider “a pro se litigant’s complaint ‘in light of’ all filings,” Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … James v. Hurson Assocs., Inc. v. Glickman, 229 F.3d 277, 284 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    618 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 11, 1980

    United States v. CAB, 511 F.2d 1315 , 1322 (D.C.Cir.1975). … Trans Alaska Pipeline Cases, 436 U.S. 631, 643 , 98 S.Ct. 2053, 2061 , 56 L.Ed. 591 (1978), quoting Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 1162, 1166 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Legislative Study Club, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    359 A.2d 153 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1976

    Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282, 286 (1974); Taylor v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230, 232 (1973). … Petitioner cites us to the recent Supreme Court case of N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Vhs Acquisition Subsidiary Number 7, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2024

    Saint Vincent claims that the Board’s pursuit of damages infringes upon its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. Id. at 19 (citing Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462, 489 (2011) and Sec. Exch. Comm’n v. … Saint Vincent’s beef with the Board is due to its conflict with the Union. In other words, the present constitutional claims “would not exist but for the underlying [Board charges].” Armco, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    514 F.2d 834 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1975

    ALPA declined to prosecute its petition to review following the opinion of our court in Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. CAB, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 494 F.2d 1118 (1974). … The Board objected to it.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • CVS Albany, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    709 F. App'x 10 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 2017

    ) of Contracts § 203(a)); see Segar v. … See Hard Rock Holdings, LLC v. NLRB, 672 F.3d 1117, 1120-21 (D.C. Cir. 2012).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

    116 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2000

    Currently, only one person sits on the board of both companies. Similarly, the overlap between the [BAT Ind.] and Brown & Williamson boards of directors has been minimal and currently no member sits on both boards. … (Neville, J.); State of Hawaii v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Civil No. 97-0441-01 (Haw.Cir.Cl.); State of Indiana v. Philip Morris, Inc., No. 49D07-9702-CT-000236 (Ind.Super. Ct.

    Cited 187 timesPublished
  • Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America v. United States Department of Agriculture

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2025

    Dep’t of Educ. v. Brown, 600 U.S. 551, 565 (2023) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 553(e)). R-CALF’s second theory of standing fares no better. … The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Department of Education v. Brown, 600 U.S. 551 (2023), provides significant guidance on this question.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board

    409 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 1976

    National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943) and Railway Clerks v. … Non-contract Employees, 380 U.S. 650 , 85 S.Ct. 1192 , 14 L.Ed.2d 133 (1965) as well as the decision rendered by this circuit in International Ass’n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hannington v. Weinberger

    393 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1975

    Moreover, it misses the point made by Board of Regents v. … Like Brown v. Weinberger, Ryan v. Shea (Civ.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • 800 Water Street, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    992 A.2d 1272 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 2010

    See Odeniran v. Hanley Wood, LLC, 985 A.2d 421, 428 (D.C.2009) (interpreting unemployment compensation statute); Mayberry v. … See Allen v. Schultheiss, 981 A.2d 610 , 613 n. 3 (D.C.2009).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Local No. 5, United Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

    321 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1963

    321 F.2d 366 LOCAL NO. 5, UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF the PLUMBING AND PIPE FITTING INDUSTRY OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … Local 1976, etc., Carpenters' Union v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.

    286 F.3d 513 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 2002

    The Board responded to Burke’s opposition, arguing that: (1) several of Burke’s claims were not “adverse employment actions” and were therefore barred under the recently-issued decision in Brown v. … See Brown, 199 F.3d at 458 .

    Cited 434 timesPublished
  • Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

    373 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1967

    Grant Co. v. NLRB, 337 F.2d 447, 449 (7th Cir. 1964), the Board held that the mere request was a violation of the Act. … C. § 158(d), the Board has power to direct execution of the contract. H. J. Heinz Co. v. NLRB, 311 U.S. 514 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 (1941). 7 B.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.