Case law

Holbrook v. Precision Helicopters, Inc.

162 Or. App. 538 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1999

In Carlson v. … Sappington v. Brown, 68 Or App 72, 77 , 682 P2d 775 , rev den 298 Or 238 (1984). Our review of the record does not reveal that defendant raised any of the potential errors regarding damages below.

Homlitas v. United States

202 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 15, 1962

Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 , the negligence occurred after the serviceman was discharged from the armed services and is patently not in point. The decision in Healy v. … AFR 76-6 V * * ♦ * “a.

Rystadt v. Multnomah County Ass., Tc-Md 110419c (or.tax 6-30-2011)

Oregon Tax Court · Jun 30, 2011

Defendant alleges in its Motion that Plaintiff did not file his appeal within 30 days of the date of the mailing of the county board of property tax appeals (BOPTA) order. … Defendant was represented by Jeff Brown and David Babcock. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS This appeal involves three unimproved lots that Plaintiff purchased from a bank for $75,000 each.

Sutherlin Education Ass'n v. Sutherlin School District No. 130

25 Or. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1976

Assn v. Sch. Dist., 24 Or App 751 , 547 P2d 647 (1976). … Similarly, we do not view the negotiation process as an illegal delegation of the local board’s duties since the board is under no obligation to agree, only to bargain in good faith. Springfield Ed. Assn v. Sch.

Anderson v. Alexander

191 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1951

In Turner v. … Brown et al. v. State Personnel Board et al., 43 Cal. App. 2d 70 , 110 P. 2d 497 .

State v. Miller

287 Or. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 2017

See State v. … See State v.

Zottola v. Three Rivers School District

202 Or. App. 235 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 2005

PER CURIAM Petitioner, a teacher, seeks review of an order of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board that concluded that she had been wrongfully discharged and determined that the amount of her back-pay award should be offset by … Seibel v. Liberty Homes, Inc., 305 Or 362 , 752 P2d 291 (1988); Filter v. City of Vernonia, 95 Or App 550 , 770 P2d 83 (1989); German Auto Parts, Inc. v. BOLI, 11 Or App 522 , 826 P2d 1026 (1972). Affirmed.

State v. Millis

61 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1912

The earliest case on this point in the case of State v. Chadwick and Brown, 10 Or. 423 . … In People v.

Matherly v. State Accident Insurance Fund

28 Or. App. 691 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 1977

Standley v. SAIF, 8 Or App 429 , 495 P2d 283 (1972). … See Ritz v. SAIF, 27 Or App 725 , 557 P2d 50 (1976), Sup Ct review denied (1977).

Post v. Salem-Keizer School District

162 Or. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 21, 1999

See, e.g., Citizens Utility Bd. v. … Similarly, in Sesock v.

Mickey v. Stratton

17 F. Cas. 268 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · May 5, 1879

Tyler, Ej. 73; Day v. Alverson, 9 Wend. 233 ; Hutchinson v. Perley, 4 Cal. 34 ; Hicks v. Davis, Id. 69 ; Winans v. Christy, Id. 78 ; Bequette v. Caulfield, Id. 278; Marshall v. Shafter, 32 Cal. 194 ; Turner v. … This rule is also maintained in Eagle Woolen Mills Co. v. Monteith, 2 Or. 282 ; Brown v. Brown, 45 Mo. 414 ; Fellows v Wise, 49 Mo. 352 ; Butcher v. Bogers, 60 Mo. 140 ; Ames v. Beckley, 48 Vt. 395 ; 2 Greenl.

Oregon Society of Enrolled Agents v. State ex rel. State Board of Tax Practitioners

283 Or. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 1, 2017

See State v. … The board relies on Pendleton School Dist. v.

Witt v. Kulongoski

319 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1994

See Reed v. Roberts, 304 Or 649, 655, 657 , 748 P2d 542 (1988) (“the unambiguous language of the measure suggests a dual purpose,” modifying summary to include two effects); see also Kenagy v. … Baker v. Keisling, 312 Or 385, 392 , 822 P2d 1162 (1991).

Seeley v. Portland Public Schools - School Board

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 13, 2023

See Casey v. … See Cassidy v.

Hartman v. Oregon Elec. Ry. Co.

77 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1915

Co., 56 Or. 262, 268 ( 108 Pac. 211 ); Doyle v. Southern Pac. Co., 56 Or. 495, 516 ( 108 Pac. 201 ); Smith v. Southern Pac. Co., 58 Or. 22, 31 ( 113 Pac. 41 , Ann. Cas. 1913A, 434); Graves v. Portland etc. P. … Cas. 1915B, 500, 134 Pac. 1 ); Gynther v. Brown & McCabe, 67 Or. 310, 318 ( 134 Pac. 1186 ).

Keystone Milling Co. v. Equity Mining Co.

47 Or. 628 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1906

by Browne, which was called the “Keystone Fraction.” … Starr, one of the locators, pointed out to him what purported to be the boundary common to the Keystone and to the Wide West claims, calling his attention to a stump near an open cut to which, a board was nailed, having thereon

Cottage Grove Lumber Co. v. Lillegren

227 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1961

Lovell v. Potts, 112 Or 538, 558 , 207 P 1006 , 226 P 1111 (1924); Lumbermen’s Nat. Bank v. Campbell, 61 Or 123, 126 , 121 P 427 (1912); Hoffman v. … See Hough v. Porter, 51 Or 318, 375 , 95 P 732 , 98 P 1083 (1909); Knighton v. Chamberlin, 84 Or 153, 159 , 164 P 703 ; and Huson v. Portland & Southeastern Ry.

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Locals 626 & 2831 v. Lane County Board of Commissioners

46 Or. App. 645 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 16, 1980

This case is before us on a petition by the Employment Relations Board (ERB) for reconsideration of our opinion in AFSCME v. Lane County, 45 Or App 161 , 607 P2d 1212 (1980). … The County cannot rely upon its unfair labor practice complaint and this Board’s final determination thereon, to block an otherwise legal strike under ORS 243.726.”

Shicor v. Bd. of Speech Language Pathology & Audiology

291 Or. App. 369 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2018

We take the following undisputed historical facts from the board's order. See Coffey v. … See Talbott v.

State Ex Rel. Willamette National Lumber Co. v. Circuit Court

187 Or. 591 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1949

Milliken, 149 Ky. 516 , 149 S.W. 875 ; Alabama Clay Products Co. v. City of Birmingham, 226 Ala. 631 , 148 So. 328 ; Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 119 N. J. L. 164, 194 A. 870 . … There was no suggestion that the corporation maintained a principal or any place of business any *613 where except in Brown County, so the case is not of much help here. Another case cited "by respondents is Partch v.