Case law

Lowden v. Excise Bd. of Cotton County

170 Okla. 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1935

In accordance with the opinion in case No. 25479, Lowden et al. v. … Excise Board of Pittsburg County, this day decided, 170 Okla. 181 , 40 P. (2d) 16 , this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the Court of Tax Review to enter judgment in accordance with the stipulation as follows

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma County Board of Equalization

934 P.2d 363 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1996

Board answered and then filed a motion for summary judgment and brief. AT & T filed a brief in response. The trial court granted Board’s motion and dismissed the case. … When a taxpayer is provided with a remedy by an equalization board, the availability of that remedy precludes suit in the district court. Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. Keyes, 836 P.2d 1283 (Okla.1992).

Board of Education of Dependent School District No. 23 Osage County v. Allen

615 P.2d 1009 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 7, 1980

In Hoffman v. … In Halgren v.

Seay v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 21, 2020

Because 2 Oklahoma Board of Governors of Registered Dentists v. Lois Jacobs, Case No. 79,315. See Plaintiffs’ Motion [Doc. No. 50-14] at 2, 20. … Crosswhite v. Brown, 424 F.2d 495, 496 (10th Cir. 1970) (per curiam); Lawson v. Okmulgee Cty. Criminal Justice Auth., 726 F.

Hopley, Treasurer, Etc. v. Benton

38 Okla. 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1913

Oklahoma City v. McMaster, 12 Okla. 570 , 73 Pac. 1012 ; Provins v. Lovi, 6 Okla. 94 , 50 Pac. 81 . … In Territory of Ohio, v.

Seay v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 10, 2020

Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 565 (1988). … Id; accord Lester v. City of Lafayette, Colo., 639 F. App’x 538, 542 (10th Cir. 2016).

Ada Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. Snead

362 P.2d 688 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1961

The-first was disposed of in Ada Coca-Cola Bottling Co. et al., v. … Co. v.

Porter v. Windham

550 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1981

In Brice v. … It is noted in Brice v.

Craig v. Bond

160 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1932

In the case of Dancy v. … Mills v. Stewart, Sec. of State, 210 P. 465 , from the State of Montana, and Morrissey v Wait (Neb.) 138 N. W. 186 . Our court, in the case of Dove v.

Howard v. Davis

40 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1913

That the house on the premises was unoccupied, and Wilson boarded up the windows and nailed up the door. That on the 6th day of January, 1911, Hardy Grant served notice on Wilson to vacate the premises. … (Citing Campbell v. Coonradt, 22 Kan. 704 ; Conaway v. Gore, 27 Kan. 127 ; Burdette v. Corgan, 27 Kan. 275 ; Emsley v. Bennett, 37 Iowa, 15 ). In the case of Brown v. Feagins, 37 Neb. 256 , 55 N.

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 28, 2011

Brown v. City of Warr Acres , 946 P.2d 1140 , 1143-44 (Okla. 1997) (footnotes omitted). … Brown v. City of Warr Acres , 946 P.2d 1140 , 1144-45 (Okla. 1997). E.

School Dist. No. 34 v. Joint School Dist. No. 34

156 Okla. 5 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1932

CLARK, V. C. J. … The question involved in this appeal has been decided by this court in the case of Brown, County Treasurer, et al. v.

Jack's Supper Club, Ltd. v. City of Norman

361 P.2d 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1961

In Constant v. Brown, 189 Okl. 147 , 114 P.2d 477 , this Court held that the City of Blackwell could not enact a traffic ordinance in direct conflict with statutory rules established by the Legislature. … In Gant et al. v.

Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 4, 2025

See Parker v. Dowling, 664 Fed. … See Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, Case No. CIV-20-981-C, 2021 WL 1137963, at *2 (W.D. Okla. Jan. 28, 2021) (quoting Straley v.

Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Tulsa v. Tulsa Camera Record

103 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1924

Perry Water & Ice Co. v. City of Perry, 29 Okla. 503 , 120 Pac. 582 ; Heed v. Marion County, 21 Kan. 419 ; Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 Pac. 592 ; Covington v. … Rep. 128; Smith v. Board of County Commissioners, Kay County, 47 Okla. 184 , 148 Pac. 111 ; News Dispatch Ptg. Co. & Auditing Co. v. Board of County Commissioners, 61 Okla. 259 , 166 Pac. 207 ; Worrell Mfg. Co. v.

Abernathy v. Huston

166 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1933

Brown v. Trent, 36 Okla. 239 , 128 P. 895 . … As was said in the case of Schulte v. Board of County Commissioners, 119 Okla. 261 , 250 P. 123 . “The attack on a judgment rendered by a court on the ground of fraud is in the nature of an equitable proceeding.”

Goff v. Goff

124 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1926

However, this court decided on April 5, 1921, in the case of Pigeon v. … Board of County Com’rs of Kay County v. State of Kansas, 19 Okla. 375 , 91 Pac. 699 ; Okla. Moline Plow Co. v. Smith, 81 Okla. 16 , 196 Pac. 962 ; Brown v. Calvert, 57 Okla. 364 , 157 Pac. 284 ; Johnson v.

Curtis v. Bd. of Commr. of Sequoyah Cty.

33 Okla. 471 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1912

Laws 1909, entitled "An act to enable counties, municipal corporations, the boards of education of any city or school districts to refund their indebtedness." … There is no provision authorizing such a remonstrance to be heard before the board of county commissioners.

New York Life Ins. v. Bd. of Com'rs of Okla. Cty.

155 Okla. 247 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1932

Citing: Lovingston v. Board of Trustees, 99 Ill. 572 ; Illinois Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Peoria, 29 Ill. 180 ; Ducat v. Chicago, 48 Ill. 172 ; Walker v. Springfield, 94 Ill. 364 . … Insurance Co. v. Debolt, 16 How. 435 ; Delaware Railroad Co. Tax Case, 18 Wall. 226 ; Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania, 21 Wall. 498 ; Farrington v. Tennessee, 95 U. S. 686 ; Tennessee v. Whitworth, 117 U.

State Ex Rel. Brennan v. Shelton

27 Okla. 322 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1910

Laws Okla. 1909, relating to the time of filing nominating petitions, provides: “* * * * Nominating petitions required by this act to be filed with the secretary of the county election board shall be filed not more than ninety … election unless the nominating petition was filed not less than thirty days before the day fixed by law for the primary election where the petition was one required to be filed with the secretary of the county election board