Case law

MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89

69 O.B.A.J. 2254 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1998

County, 1974 OK 104, ¶¶ 16-18 , 526 P.2d 936, 939 ; Brown v. State Election Bd., 1962 OK 36 , 369 P.2d 140,152 . … Dowell v. Board of Education, supra. McGowen, 112 P.2d at 355 .

Seay v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 9, 2021

Plaintiffs seek to consolidate this case with Seay et al. v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry et al., No. CIV-17-682-D. Defendants filed a Response [Doc. No. 11]. … See Shump v. Balka, 574 F.2d 1341, 1344 (10th Cir. 1978); Gillette Motor Transp. v. N. Okla. Butane Co., 179 F.2d 711, 712 (10th Cir. 1950).

Pettyjohn v. Plaster

69 O.B.A.J. 1434 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1998

Crow v. Abraham, 86 Or. 99 , 167 P. 590, 591 (1917). Cf., Flick v. … Co. v. U.S.

Western Paving v. Bd. of Com'rs of Lincoln

183 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1938

In Brown v. … Nolen v. Nelson, 310 Mo. 527 , 275 S. W. 927 ; Treas. of Jefferson County v. Shannon, 51 Pa. 221 ; Gamble v. Clark (Ga.) 19 S. E. 54 ; Board of Co. Com’rs v. Sims (Colo.) 74 P. 457 .

Marion v. Territory Ex Rel. Wilson

1 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1893

People, 29 Ill. 72 , and approved in Berry v, Nicholson, 102 N. … To the same effect are Whipley v. Kune, 12 Cal. 352 ; Colt v. Eves, 12 Conn. 243 ; Dole v. Irwin, 78 Ill. 170 ; Bacon v. Malyocher, 102 Ill. 663 ; Paine v. Elections, S. 309; Killin v. Chapman, 34 Cal. 635 .

Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Com'rs Coal Co.

77 Okla. 137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1920

In Crutchfield v. … Horton v. Haines, 23 Okla. 878 , 102 Pac. 121 . The court did not err in overruling motion for change of venue.

Southwestern Public Service Co. v. State

637 P.2d 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1981

Banking Board, Okl., 512 P.2d 166 (1973) this court had under consideration on appeal from a judgment of the Court of Bank Review certain findings of that board. … See footnote 1, supra, and Brown v. Banking Board, supra. . State of New York v. United States, 331 U.S. 284 , 67 S.Ct. 1207 , 91 L.Ed. 1492 . . United Fuel & Gas Co. v.

Rakowski v. Wagoner, County Judge

24 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

Board of County Commissioners, 5 Idaho, 178 , 47 Pac. 943 , sustains the use of the words “term” and “session/'" in view of the context, as interchangeable. See, also, State v. … Vicknair, 118 La. 963 , 43 South. 635 ; MacNaughton v. Southern, etc., R. Co. (C. C.) 19 Fed. 881 ; Com. v. Brown, 11 Phila. (Pa.) 370; Doles v. Hilton, 48 Ark. 308 , 3 S. W. 193 ; Helm v.

Wykoff v. W. H. Wheeler & Co.

38 Okla. 771 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1913

Y.) 192; Hull and Argalls v. County of Marshall et al., 12 Iowa, 142 ; Brady v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 20 N. Y. 312 ; Agent of State Prison v. Lathrop, 1 Mich. 438 ; Harnan v. … In Camp et al. v.

Bd. of Education of City of Hugo, Choctaw v. Couch

63 Okla. 65 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1917

W. 368 ; School Town of Carthage v. Gray, 10 Ind. App. 428 , 7 N. E. 1059 , cited in 34 Ann. Cas. 142; Libby v. Inhabitants of Douglas, 175 Mass. 128 , 55 N. E. 808 ; McKay v. … A. 371; Baylies v. Fettyplace, 7 Mass. 325 ; Dewey v. School District, 43 Mich. 480 , 5 N. W. 646 , 38 Am. Rep. 206 ; School Town of Carthage v. Gray, 10 Ind. 428 , 37 N. E. 1059 .

Tubbs v. State, ex rel. Teachers' Retirement System

73 O.B.A.J. 2909 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 2002

Henderson v. … Sandejur v. Vanderslice, 1944 OK 129 , 151 P.2d 430 . The Board of Trustees of the Teachers’ Retirement System of Oklahoma made an error of law when deciding Tubbs’ protest.

Arthur v. City of Stillwater

611 P.2d 637 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1980

Walker, 237 Ark. 586 , 374 S.W.2d 476 (1964); Turner v. Board of Education, 266 S.W.2d 321 (Ky. 1954). [11] Sykes v. Belk, 278 N.C. 106 , 179 S.E.2d 439 (1971). [12] Lucchese v. … Walker, 237 Ark. 586 , 374 S.W.2d 476 (1946); Turner v. Board of Education, 266 S.W.2d 321 (Ky. 1954).

Cooperton Cons. School Dist. No. 10 v. Roosevelt Cons. School Dist. No. 7

194 Okla. 47 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1944

Pippin, 134 Okla. 136 , 272 P. 455 ; 56 C.J. 275, par. 120, and page 729, par. 852; Board of Education, City of Wichita v. Barrett, 101 Kan. 568 , 167 P. 1068 ; Hughes et al. v. … See Towle, Trustee, v. Brown, 110 Ind. 65 , 10 N.E. 626 , and for this reason we consider them inapplicable here.

Meador & Whitaker Co. v. Davis

177 Okla. 387 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1936

In Fox v. … Brown, 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P. (2d) 129 , we held that: “In cases where multiple injuries are presented to the State Industrial Commission and that administrative board upon a consideration of the matter awards compensation

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 7, 2000

Gordon v. Browning, 572 P.2d 603 , 605 (Okla.Ct.App. 1977) (citing Irwin v. … See Browning, 572 P.2d at 605.

Betts v. Commissioners of the Land Office

27 Okla. 64 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1910

Brown, 20 Okla. 355 , 94 Pac. 703 ; Territory v. Long Bell Lbr. Co., 22 Okla. 890 , 99 Pac. 911 ; City Council, etc., v. … The title to the land is in the state, and the board is merely a governmental agency of the state, which is trustee. City of Chicago v. People ex rel. Miller, 80 Ill. 384 ; Jernigan, Treas., v.

HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

2023 OK 59 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 2023

HIRSCHFELD v. … Fraternal Order of Police v.

Seay v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 10, 2020

CIV-17-682 D ) (1) OKLAHOMA BOARD OF DENTISTRY, ) et. al., ) … Servants of Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir. 2000) (citing Brumark Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).

Watkins v. Bd. of Com'rs of Stephens County

70 Okla. 305 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1918

At any rate, the appeal took the ease out of the jurisdiction of the board of county commissioners and deprived the board of power to act further in the matter until final determination of the matters involved. … We therefore have before us for consideration only the proceedings before the board of county commissioners and the appeal from the board’s action.

Union Tp. v. Oakdale Tp.

30 Okla. 708 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1912

That on January 4,1904, the board of county commissioners of Washita county divided Union township, creating the south half thereof into Oakdale township. … The defendant in error on this proposition relies mainly on the doctrine announced by the Supreme Court of Indiana in Towle, Trustee, v. Brown, Auditor, 110 Ind. 65, 599 , 10 N. E. 626, 628 .