Case law

State v. Schneider

97 S.W.3d 494 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2002

Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 10 S.W.3d 540, 544 (Mo.App.1999) (quoting Green v. Douglas, 977 S.W.2d 32 , 33 (Mo.App.1998)). … Brown, 902 S.W.2d at 284 . “The rule makes it clear that not all prejudicial error — that is, reversible error — can be deemed plain error.” State v. Dowell, 25 S.W.3d 594, 606 (Mo.App.2000).

Chaplin v. Kansas City

259 Mo. 479 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1914

BROWN, C. … Wagner, the members of the board of park commissioners.

Big Tarkio Drainage District v. Voltmer

256 Mo. 152 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 24, 1914

[State ex rel. v. Wilson, 216 Mo. 215 ; Tarkio Drainage District v. Richardson, 237 Mo. 49 ; Drainage District v. Tomlinson, 245 Mo. 1 .] … [State v. Bulling, 100 Mo. 87 ; Brown v. Woody, 64 Mo. 547 ; State ex rel. v. Nixon, 232 Mo. 496 .] We are aware that in Tarkio Drainage District v.

STATE EX REL. VALENTINE v. Orr

366 S.W.3d 534 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 2012

Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006). However, if the respondent’s actions are wrong as a matter of law, then he or she has abused any discretion he or she may have had, and mandamus is appropriate. Id. … of discretion by the Board.

Union National Bank v. Lyons

220 Mo. 538 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1909

[Gwin v. Smurr, 101 Mo. 550 ; Craig v. VanBebber, 100 Mo. 584 ; Brown v. Miller, 46 Mo. App. 1 .] “The mere statement of this case readily suggests its decision. … The same principle involved in this case Was involved in the case of Binion v. Browning, 26 Mo. 270 .

State ex rel. Union Pacific Railroad v. Dierker

961 S.W.2d 816 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 27, 1998

In Brown v. Missouri Pacific R.R. … See Brown v. Missouri Pacific R.R. Co., 720 S.W.2d at 360 .

Board of Education ex rel. Philip Carey Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

155 Mo. App. 109 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1911

Co. v. Gordon, 173 Mo. 139 , 73 S. W. 155 ; Lawrence v. Shreve, 26 Mo. 492 ; McLean v. Stuve, 15 Mo. App. 317, 320 .] … Pub Co. v. Gordon, 173 Mo. 139 , 73 S. W. 155 ; McLean v. Stuve, 15 Mo. App. 317, 321 .]

Johnston v. Donworth

127 Mo. App. 377 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1907

Brown v. McMillan, 108 Mo. 153 , 18 S. W. 781 . … -Gen. v. Board of Supervisors, 21 Wis. 443 .] In Smith v.

State v. Ellis

294 Mo. 269 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1922

[State v. Jackson, 186 S.W. (Mo.) 990; State v. Moore, 225 S.W. (Mo.) 924; State v. Gulley, 272 Mo. 484 , 199 S.W. 124 ; State v. Brown, 234 S.W. 785 .] II. … Brown, 73 Mo. 631 .]

Middleton v. First National Bank

399 S.W.3d 463 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 10, 2013

Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 871, 376 (Mo. banc 1998). … Bank argued to the trial court that "the real issue is whether the Bank was contractually allowed to use the proceeds of the $200,000 CD to satisfy an individual debt of Brown Middleton.” . Bank’s reliance on Scott v.

Liddell v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO.

674 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 3, 1987

See infra Section V. … Liddell v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 758 F.2d 290 (8th Cir.1985).

Curtis v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Professional Land Surveyors & Professional Landscape Architects

534 S.W.3d 264 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 2017

Curtis cites Bird v. … Under Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, 744 S.W.2d 524, 538-39 (Mo. App.

Hovey v. Sauer

50 Mo. 301 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1872

Ky. Bd. of Med. Licensure v. Strauss

558 S.W.3d 443 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2018

Shawnee Telecom Res., Inc. v. Brown, 354 S.W.3d 542 (Ky. 2011). … in fact the case held the opposite); "dicta found in Rapier v.

Wehrman v. Liberty Petroleum Company

382 S.W.2d 56 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1964

Brown was the manager of the corporate defendant’s station, which implied some general powers. Heinold v. Muntz T. V. Inc., Mo., 262 S.W.2d 32, 36 . … Brown v. Sloan’s Moving & Storage Co., Mo., 296 S.W.2d 20 ; Raymond, Missouri Instructions, Vol. 2, p. 207, Sec. 4101.

State ex rel. Collet v. Scopel

316 S.W.2d 515 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1958

Cooper, 147 Kan. 710 , 78 P.2d 884, 888 ; Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Lensgraf, La.App., 101 So.2d 734, 736 ; Board of Medical Examiners of Utah v. … Blair, 57 Utah 516 , 196 P. 221 ; State Board of Dental Examiners v. Rymer, Tenn., 303 S.W.2d 959 ; State v.

State Ex Rel. Horspool v. Haid

328 Mo. 327 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1931

The case upon which respondents rely, State ex rel. v. Becker, 293 S. … It was the scaffold boards which fell — not the lookouts, nor the upright. The ruling of the Court of Appeals that a case was made for the jury is in conflict with Williams v. Ransom, 234 Mo. l. c. 69; Forbes v.

David Dwyer v. Kansas City Missouri School District

451 S.W.3d 704 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2014

The duties associated with that process are more akin to the duties discussed in Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. banc 1983). … Brown v. Hamid, 856 S.W.2d 51, 55 (Mo. banc 1993). The circuit court has broad discretion to admit or exclude evidence, and we will not reverse its ruling absent an abuse of discretion. Id. at 56.

Brown v. Adams and Associates, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 15, 2020

Pye v. … See Denn v.

Deland v. City of Cameron

112 Mo. App. 704 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 22, 1905

Brown v. Railway, 99 Mo. 310 . There is sufficient evidence in the record tending to show a permanent condition of injury, and the issue therefore was for the consideration of the jury. … Brown v. Railway, supra.