Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.41s
Fields v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
559 S.W.3d 12 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 2018
See State v. … North Carolina v.
Cited 7 timesPublished114 S.W.3d 871 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2003
Although we have found no comparable case under Section 217.378, RSMo, the holding and discussion in Brown v. Gammon, 947 S.W.2d 437 (Mo.App.1997), is helpful. … In Green v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBrown v. Missouri Department of Corrections
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 28, 2022
See Topchian v. … See Popoalii v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownState Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Remmers
340 Mo. 126 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1936
[Railroad v. State Board, 64 Mo. 294 .] ” [State ex rel. Teasdale v. Smith, 101 Mo. 174 , 14 S. W. 108 ; State ex rel. v. Caulfield (en banc), 333 Mo. 270, 273 , 62 S. W. (2d) 818, 819 ; and cases cited.] … Denison v. City of St. Louis, 90 Mo. 19, 22 , 1 S. W. 757 .] “The reason of this rule is the evident repugnance between the fixed terms and the power of arbitrary removal.” .[State ex rel. v. Brown, 57 Mo.
Cited 16 timesPublished362 Mo. 682 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1951
Peck Co. v. Brown, 340 Mo. 1189 , 105 S. W. (2d) 909 .) We think that Sec. 1 of Art. VIH does harmonize with the Civil Service Amendment. … Plaintiff also relies on two New Jersey cases, Davaillon v. City of Elizabeth, 2 Atl. (2d) 369 and City of Camden v. Civil Service Commission, 29 Atl. (2d) 733, 33 Atl. (2d) 900.
Cited 5 timesPublished127 Mo. App. 377 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1907
Brown v. McMillan, 108 Mo. 153 , 18 S. W. 781 . … -Gen. v. Board of Supervisors, 21 Wis. 443 .] In Smith v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBrown v. Missouri Department of Corrections
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 15, 2022
P. 41(b); see also Brown vy. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (“A district court has the power under Fed. R. Civ. … .””); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F. App’x 392 (8th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of pro se litigant’s complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to file an amended complaint).
Cited 0 timesUnknown965 S.W.2d 241 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1998
Brown found that the Police Board failed to consider extenuating circumstances regarding Holt’s alcoholism, and his use of alcohol prior to the incident at issue. … Kendrick v. Board of Police Comm’rs, 945 S.W.2d 649, 651 (Mo.App.1997)(citing Clark v. School Dist. of Kansas City, 915 S.W.2d 766, 773 (Mo.App.1996)); Halford v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCosentino v. Local 618, Automotive, Petroleum & Allied Industries Employees Union
200 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 2, 1960
Getreu v. Bartenders Union, supra; Brown, etc., v. Department Store Employees, D.C., 187 F.Supp. 619 , 46 L.R.R.M. 2439 . … This has been construed to be the only employer violation which is a defense to the Board’s request for injunction. Greene v. International Typographical Union, D.C., 182 F.Supp. 788 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedSTATE EX REL. VALENTINE v. Orr
366 S.W.3d 534 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 2012
Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006). However, if the respondent’s actions are wrong as a matter of law, then he or she has abused any discretion he or she may have had, and mandamus is appropriate. Id. … of discretion by the Board.
Cited 48 timesPublishedFoster v. Village of Brownington
140 S.W.3d 603 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 2004
Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … Id. at 937 (quoting Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649, 654-55 (1941)).
Cited 28 timesPublishedBaldridge v. Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri
645 S.W.2d 139 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1982
See also Miller v. Sleight and Hellmuth Ink Co., 436 S.W.2d 625, 628 (Mo.1969); Patton v. Patton, 308 S.W.2d 739, 742-743 (Mo.1958); Brown v. … See McCoy v. Simpson, supra, 139 S.W.2d at 952 . See also Brown v. Weber Implement & Auto Co., supra, 206 S.W.2d at 354 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedGlaze Ex Rel. Board of Supervisors of Harrison County Drainage District v. Shumard
227 Mo. App. 434 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1932
[University City v. Schall, 205 S. W. 631 ; Bragg v. Special Road District v. Johnson, 20 S. W. (2d) 22 ; Butler County v. Boatmen’s Bank, 132 Mo. 13 .] … [Thompson v. Royal, 133 S. W. 146 .]
Cited 2 timesPublishedLiddell v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO.
674 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 3, 1987
See infra Section V. … Liddell v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 758 F.2d 290 (8th Cir.1985).
Cited 0 timesPublished534 S.W.3d 264 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 2017
Curtis cites Bird v. … Under Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, 744 S.W.2d 524, 538-39 (Mo. App.
Cited 2 timesPublished259 Mo. 479 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1914
BROWN, C. … Wagner, the members of the board of park commissioners.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLucinda "Cindy" Guthrie v. Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
503 S.W.3d 261 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2016
See Bird v. Mo. … Bird v. Mo.
Cited 8 timesPublishedWarren v. Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis
200 F. Supp. 2d 1053 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 23, 2001
Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979). The summary judgment procedure is not a "disfavored procedural short-cut." Rather, it is an "integral part of the Federal Rules as a whole." Celotex Corp. v. … See Knox County Education Ass'n v. Knox County Board of Education, 158 F.3d 361, 371 (6th Cir.1998); United States v. Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 360 (5th Cir.1998); United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeorge v. St. Louis Manufacturing Co.
159 Mo. 333 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1900
This machine planed the two sides of a board at the same time, as it passed through, by means of two sets of knives .revolving rapidly one above the other below the board. … Not three weeks before that, another man had been hurt there, and I took a stick to remove the clog, and I was thinking about myself, ‘If only you don’t — nothing happens to you as it did to Charley Brown,’ and at that moment
Cited 5 timesPublishedStonecipher v. Poplar Bluff R1 School District
205 S.W.3d 326 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2006
See, e.g., Board of Trustees v. Spiegel, 549 P.2d 1161, 1168 (Wyo.1976); State ex rel. Brown v. … Willard v. Red Lobster, 926 S.W.2d 550, 553-54 (Mo.App.1996) (internal citations omitted). This is true in workers’ compensation cases in Missouri and elsewhere. See, e.g., Willard, supra; Brown v.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna