Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

1.41s

  • Fields v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

    559 S.W.3d 12 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 2018

    See State v. … North Carolina v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Reed v. State

    114 S.W.3d 871 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2003

    Although we have found no comparable case under Section 217.378, RSMo, the holding and discussion in Brown v. Gammon, 947 S.W.2d 437 (Mo.App.1997), is helpful. … In Green v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Missouri Department of Corrections

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 28, 2022

    See Topchian v. … See Popoalii v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Remmers

    340 Mo. 126 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1936

    [Railroad v. State Board, 64 Mo. 294 .] ” [State ex rel. Teasdale v. Smith, 101 Mo. 174 , 14 S. W. 108 ; State ex rel. v. Caulfield (en banc), 333 Mo. 270, 273 , 62 S. W. (2d) 818, 819 ; and cases cited.] … Denison v. City of St. Louis, 90 Mo. 19, 22 , 1 S. W. 757 .] “The reason of this rule is the evident repugnance between the fixed terms and the power of arbitrary removal.” .[State ex rel. v. Brown, 57 Mo.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Riley v. Holland

    362 Mo. 682 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1951

    Peck Co. v. Brown, 340 Mo. 1189 , 105 S. W. (2d) 909 .) We think that Sec. 1 of Art. VIH does harmonize with the Civil Service Amendment. … Plaintiff also relies on two New Jersey cases, Davaillon v. City of Elizabeth, 2 Atl. (2d) 369 and City of Camden v. Civil Service Commission, 29 Atl. (2d) 733, 33 Atl. (2d) 900.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. Donworth

    127 Mo. App. 377 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1907

    Brown v. McMillan, 108 Mo. 153 , 18 S. W. 781 . … -Gen. v. Board of Supervisors, 21 Wis. 443 .] In Smith v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Missouri Department of Corrections

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 15, 2022

    P. 41(b); see also Brown vy. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (“A district court has the power under Fed. R. Civ. … .””); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F. App’x 392 (8th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of pro se litigant’s complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to file an amended complaint).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Holt v. Clarke

    965 S.W.2d 241 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1998

    Brown found that the Police Board failed to consider extenuating circumstances regarding Holt’s alcoholism, and his use of alcohol prior to the incident at issue. … Kendrick v. Board of Police Comm’rs, 945 S.W.2d 649, 651 (Mo.App.1997)(citing Clark v. School Dist. of Kansas City, 915 S.W.2d 766, 773 (Mo.App.1996)); Halford v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cosentino v. Local 618, Automotive, Petroleum & Allied Industries Employees Union

    200 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 2, 1960

    Getreu v. Bartenders Union, supra; Brown, etc., v. Department Store Employees, D.C., 187 F.Supp. 619 , 46 L.R.R.M. 2439 . … This has been construed to be the only employer violation which is a defense to the Board’s request for injunction. Greene v. International Typographical Union, D.C., 182 F.Supp. 788 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • STATE EX REL. VALENTINE v. Orr

    366 S.W.3d 534 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 2012

    Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006). However, if the respondent’s actions are wrong as a matter of law, then he or she has abused any discretion he or she may have had, and mandamus is appropriate. Id. … of discretion by the Board.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Foster v. Village of Brownington

    140 S.W.3d 603 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 2004

    Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … Id. at 937 (quoting Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649, 654-55 (1941)).

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Baldridge v. Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri

    645 S.W.2d 139 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1982

    See also Miller v. Sleight and Hellmuth Ink Co., 436 S.W.2d 625, 628 (Mo.1969); Patton v. Patton, 308 S.W.2d 739, 742-743 (Mo.1958); Brown v. … See McCoy v. Simpson, supra, 139 S.W.2d at 952 . See also Brown v. Weber Implement & Auto Co., supra, 206 S.W.2d at 354 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Glaze Ex Rel. Board of Supervisors of Harrison County Drainage District v. Shumard

    227 Mo. App. 434 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1932

    [University City v. Schall, 205 S. W. 631 ; Bragg v. Special Road District v. Johnson, 20 S. W. (2d) 22 ; Butler County v. Boatmen’s Bank, 132 Mo. 13 .] … [Thompson v. Royal, 133 S. W. 146 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Liddell v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO.

    674 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 3, 1987

    See infra Section V. … Liddell v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 758 F.2d 290 (8th Cir.1985).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Curtis v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Professional Land Surveyors & Professional Landscape Architects

    534 S.W.3d 264 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 2017

    Curtis cites Bird v. … Under Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, 744 S.W.2d 524, 538-39 (Mo. App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chaplin v. Kansas City

    259 Mo. 479 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1914

    BROWN, C. … Wagner, the members of the board of park commissioners.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lucinda "Cindy" Guthrie v. Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

    503 S.W.3d 261 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2016

    See Bird v. Mo. … Bird v. Mo.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Warren v. Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis

    200 F. Supp. 2d 1053 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 23, 2001

    Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979). The summary judgment procedure is not a "disfavored procedural short-cut." Rather, it is an "integral part of the Federal Rules as a whole." Celotex Corp. v. … See Knox County Education Ass'n v. Knox County Board of Education, 158 F.3d 361, 371 (6th Cir.1998); United States v. Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 360 (5th Cir.1998); United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • George v. St. Louis Manufacturing Co.

    159 Mo. 333 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1900

    This machine planed the two sides of a board at the same time, as it passed through, by means of two sets of knives .revolving rapidly one above the other below the board. … Not three weeks before that, another man had been hurt there, and I took a stick to remove the clog, and I was thinking about myself, ‘If only you don’t — nothing happens to you as it did to Charley Brown,’ and at that moment

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Stonecipher v. Poplar Bluff R1 School District

    205 S.W.3d 326 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2006

    See, e.g., Board of Trustees v. Spiegel, 549 P.2d 1161, 1168 (Wyo.1976); State ex rel. Brown v. … Willard v. Red Lobster, 926 S.W.2d 550, 553-54 (Mo.App.1996) (internal citations omitted). This is true in workers’ compensation cases in Missouri and elsewhere. See, e.g., Willard, supra; Brown v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.