Case law

Community Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

96 F.R.D. 619 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 1983

United States v. Morgan, supra; Warren Bank v. Camp, 396 F.2d 52, 56 (6th Cir.1968); First Federal Savings & Loan v. FHLBB, 496 F.Supp. 227 (D.Minn.1980). … Union Savings Bank v. Saxon, 209 F.Supp. 319 (D.D.C.1962); Virgo Corp. v. Paiewonsky, 39 F.R.D. 9 (D.V.I.1966).

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. National Labor Relations Board

293 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1961

-C.I.O. v. … Local 761, Internat’l Union of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 81 S.Ct. 1285, 1294 .

United Transport Service Employees of America v. National Mediation Board

141 F.2d 724 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1944

While the appeal to this court was pending the Supreme Court decided Switch-men’s Union of North America v. … National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , and the motion to dismiss is based upon the decision in that case. We think the motion must be granted.

Sheridan-Kalorama Neighborhood Council v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

411 A.2d 959 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1979

As we stated in Silverstone v. … See United States v. Bornstein, 423 U.S. 303, 310 , 96 S.Ct. 523, 528 , 46 L.Ed.2d 514 (1976); National Petroleum Refiners Ass’n v.

Computer Associates International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

282 F.3d 849 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 2002

Inc. v. NLRB, 178 F.3d 1325, 1335 (D.C.Cir.1999) (citing NLRB v. Unifemme, Inc., 570 F.2d 230 (8th Cir.1978); Sunnyvale Med. Clinic, 241 N.L.R.B. 1156 , 1979 WL 9012 (1979); NLRB v. … This was not, however, the theory on which the Board or the ALJ relied below and hence cannot be relied upon here. See SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943).

Baylor University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

593 F.2d 1290 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1979

*1291 MacKINNON, Circuit Judge: We are here concerned with the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in Beth Israel Hospital v. … NLRB, 437 U.S. 483 , 98 S.Ct. 2463 , 57 L.Ed.2d 370 (1978), for this court's decision in Baylor University Medical Center v. NLRB, 188 U.S.App.D.C. 109 , 578 F.2d 351 (1978).

Carter v. Lynn

401 F. Supp. 1383 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1975

This case is very similar to Brown v. General Services Administration, 507 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir. 1974). Upon facts substantially the same as in this case, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the E.E.O. … Again, Brown v. General Services Administration, supra, has addressed this argument.

Order of Railway Conductors of America v. National Mediation Board

141 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1944

We are of opinion the motion must be granted on the authority of the decision of the Supreme Court in Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 . … Clerks etc., v.

In Re Stuart

942 A.2d 1118 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 2008

“Where respondent has not objected to the [identical] discipline proposed by the Board, the court’s ordinarily deferential standard is even more deferential.” In re Brown, 912 A.2d 568, 571 (D.C.2006). … See Stuart v. Grievance Comm. for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Dists., — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 274 , 166 L.Ed.2d 152 (2006); In re Stuart, 6 N.Y.3d 715 , 823 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 856 N.E.2d 920 (2006).

Midway Clover Farm Market, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

318 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 1969

Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 , 79 S.Ct. 180 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1959) ), (2) where the Board has violated a constitutional right of the plaintiff (Fay v. … Brown Lumber Co., 336 F.2d 641 (C.A.6, 1954). 3. Plaintiff has also failed to demonstrate that the Board has violated its constitutional rights.

WASHINGTON BOARD OF TRADE v. McLAUGHLIN

267 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1959

267 F.2d 633 WASHINGTON BOARD OF TRADE, Eckington Building Supply Co., Monaghan-Randels, Inc., Cafe Burgundy, Inc., Robert R. Swarthout, Appellants, v. Robert E. McLAUGHLIN, David B. Karrick, Col. A. C. … See, e. g., Eccles v. Peoples Bank, 1948, 333 U.S. 426 , 68 S.Ct. 641 , 92 L.Ed. 784 ; State of California v. Latimer, 1938, 305 U.S. 255 , 59 S.Ct. 166 , 83 L.Ed. 159 . 4 Affirmed.

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

365 A.2d 372 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1976

Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 (1973). … Palmer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535, 538 (1972); Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 293 A.2d 470, 473 (1972). 3 .

United States Testing Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

160 F.3d 14 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1999

, and because the Board failed to find that the individual claims experience was confidential and protected from disclosure under Detroit Edison Co. v. … The court applies the familiar substantial evidence test to the Board’s findings of fact and application of law to the facts, see NLRB v. United Ins.

Indiana ex rel. Indiana State Board of Public Welfare v. Ewing

99 F. Supp. 734 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 1951

The basis of the Federal Administrator’s determination is found in the recent amendment to the Indiana Welfare Act, Acts 1936, Sp.Sess., c. 3, § 93, as amended by Acts 1951, c. 321, which requires the county welfare board … One of the more recent expressions is found in Hammond v. Hull, 76 U.S.App. D.C. 301, 303, 131 F.2d 23, 25 , in an opinion by Mr.

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

256 F.2d 711 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 22, 1958

We think the Board was right in giving weight to this fact. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. v. United States, 313 U.S. 98 , 61 S.Ct. 884 , 85 L.Ed. 1212 . “It is not theory but the impact of the rate order which counts. … Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 146 , 73 S.Ct. 592 , 97 L.Ed. 912 ; Market Street Ry. Co. v. Railroad Commission of State of California, 324 U.S. 548 , 65 S.Ct. 770 , 89 L.Ed. 1171 . Cf. Railway Express Agency, Inc., v.

Liquor Industry Bargaining Group v. National Labor Relations Board

50 F. App'x 444 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 2002

. § 160 (e), (f) (1994), this court will ‘reverse the Board if, upon reviewing the record as a whole, we conclude that the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence.’ ” Associated Milk Producers, Inc. v. … Inc. v. NLRB, 178 F.3d 1325, 1329 (D.C.Cir.1999)). “[T]he Board’s finding of bad faith negotiation is, like any question of fact (really a mixed question), entitled to a good deal of deference.”

New York-New York, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

676 F.3d 193 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2012

But this Court concluded that the Board had not adequately explained its reasoning. See New York New York, LLC v. NLRB, 313 F.3d 585, 588 (D.C.Cir.2002). … New York New York, LLC v. NLRB, 313 F.3d 585, 590 (D.C.Cir.2002).

Mike-Sell's Potato Chip Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

623 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 24, 2015

The Board cross-petitions for enforcement of its order. “Judicial review of NLRB unfair labor practice findings is limited.” Douglas Foods Corp. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 1056,1061 (D.C.Cir.2001). … Credibility determinations made by the administrative law judge (ALJ) and adopted by the Board will be “accept[ed] ... unless they are patently insupportable.” ' NLRB v.

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

684 F.2d 31 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 1982

See, e.g., Nat’l Courier Ass’n v. Board of Governors of FRS, 516 F.2d 1229, 1242 (D.C.Cir.1975); Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train, 491 F.2d 63, 64, 68, 69 (D.C.Cir.1974). … DALLEY: Since the Board is merging the two, it does not matter very much. Transcript at 66. . In Kodiak Airways, Inc. v.

Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

454 F.3d 359 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 2006

Cross Harbor R.R. v. … Corp. v. United States, 817 F.2d 844 , 849 (D.C.Cir.1987); Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971)).