Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.50s
178 Vt. 222 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Jul 22, 2005
The officers moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis of qualified immunity, asserting that they had not violated any clearly established federal law or state rights. … Furthermore, once the issue was raised, Sprague had the burden to rebut the qualified immunity defense “by establishing that the official’s allegedly wrongful conduct violated clearly established law.
Cited 20 timesPublished565 U.S. 535 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 22, 2012
“The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … the legal rules that were ‘clearly established’ at the time it was taken.”
Cited 800 timesPublished148 N.M. 831 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 2010
It granted Defendant Parkin qualified immunity, determining that “there was no apparent violation of a clearly established constitutional right” because it was reasonable for Defendant Parkin to have been uncertain as to … , granted Defendant Parkin qualified immunity, which entitled him to summary judgment as a matter of law.
Cited 18 timesPublishedMerrilee Berge, V. Kitsap County
Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 11, 2023
RECREATIONAL IMMUNITY 1. … See also Lockner, 190 Wn.2d at 532 (“To qualify for immunity under RCW 4.24.210, the landowner must establish that the land at issue was (1) open 5 No. 56865-9-II to
Cited 0 timesUnpublished819 N.W.2d 383 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 15, 2012
Accordingly, Grabe is entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law for these alleged actions. 2. Whether Hester violated the clearly established constitutional rights of Minor or D.A. … Hester argues, however, that he is entitled to qualified immunity because Minor and D.A. failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he violated D.A.’s clearly established constitutional right under
Cited 41 timesPublished438 S.W.3d 292 · Kentucky Supreme Court · Apr 17, 2014
His general duty to look out for the safety of the students is clearly discretionary in nature, and he is just as clearly entitled to qualified immunity. … Consequently, he does not have qualified immunity, and can be sued individually.
Cited 92 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 25, 2021
“Qualified immunity protects government officials from civil liability in their individual capacity to the extent that their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights.” … unlawfulness of the conduct was ‘clearly established at the time.’”
Cited 0 timesUnpublished147 S.W.3d 609 · Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Aug 31, 2004
Government officials performing *616 discretionary functions have qualified immunity from liability for actions that do not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would … In conducting a qualified immunity analysis, the reviewing court first determines whether the plaintiff has alleged a violation of a clearly established constitutional right. See Siegert v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedBenner v. Saint Paul Public Schools, I.S.D. 625
District Court, D. Minnesota · May 6, 2019
Gruenewald’s Qualified Immunity Defense With respect to Principal Gruenewald – the “individual defendant” – Defendants argue that, because there is no “clearly established legal right to be free … speech in these circumstances was clearly established”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSupreme Court of Iowa · May 9, 2025
Third, the plaintiff must plead “that the law was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.” Id. … Do the people have a clearly established right, privilege, or immunity to be free from being rear-ended? T-boned? Side-swiped?
Cited 0 timesPublishedLambert v. RIVERBOAT GAMING ENFORC. DIV.
706 So. 2d 172 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1997
In support of their application, defendants contend that the trial court erred: (1) in ruling that defendants had established the qualified immunity defense, yet failing to grant their exception of no cause of action and … Accordingly, in Kyle , this court examined the pleadings to determine whether the plaintiff had set forth material facts therein which, if taken as true, showed that defendants had violated a clearly established right of
Cited 33 timesPublished652 A.2d 110 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 1995
Qualified Immunity A plaintiff may maintain a section 1983 5 claim against governmental employees only if they are not entitled to qualified immunity. … The two-part test for denial of qualified immunity is (1) whether the plaintiffs constitutional rights were violated, and (2) whether those rights were so clearly established that the defendants would have known that their
Cited 14 timesPublished30 Kan. App. 2d 1163 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Oct 25, 2002
established law.” … Second, was the constitutional right clearly established? See McCormick, 272 Kan. at 642 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Jan 8, 2021
Nonetheless, because Irwin has not demonstrated that they violated clearly established law, the Court grants summary judgment to the Defendant–Officers based on qualified immunity.4 1. … The Defendant–Officers did not violate clearly established law.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTrellus Richmond v. Mario J. Badia
47 F.4th 1172 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 22, 2022
Richmond further argues that Badia’s actions violated his clearly established rights, such that Badia’s qualified immunity defense fails. … “A right may be clearly established for qualified immunity purposes in one of three ways: (1) [Eleventh Circuit or Supreme Court] case law with indistinguishable facts clearly establishing the constitu- tional right; (2)
Cited 89 timesPublishedFlorida Highway Patrol, a division etc. v. Lashonta Renea Jackson, as Per. Rep. etc.
238 So. 3d 430 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 23, 2018
Reeves, 80 F.3d 1101, 1104 (6th Cir. 1996) (“Hunter established that the determination of whether qualified immunity applies to an officer’s judgment as to probable cause is one for the court, not the jury, to make”); Ansley … This appears to be the analysis undertaken by Judge Rothenberg in Pozos when she concluded that the record “clearly established” the legal question of sovereign immunity. Pozos, 42 Fla. L.
Cited 19 timesPublished552 F.3d 12 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Jan 7, 2009
Qualified Immunity. This case differs from a garden-variety summary judgment case because it involves the doctrine of qualified immunity. … Given this well-settled jurisprudence, there is no legitimate doubt that the right asserted here was clearly established.
Cited 173 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 1, 2020
Qualified Immunity 21 “Qualified immunity attaches when an official’s conduct does not violate clearly 22 established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … “Qualified immunity attaches when an official’s conduct does not violate 17 clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 27, 2023
After the issue of qualified immunity is ' Defendants have each appeared in this case and asserted the affirmative defense of qualified immunity. (See Dkt. Nos. 32, 33, 34.) … .”); see also Backe, 691 F.3d at 648 (explaining that “this court has established a careful procedure under which a district court may defer its qualified immunity ruling if further factual development is necessary to
Cited 0 timesUnknownHerndon v. Henderson Police Department
District Court, D. Nevada · Sep 23, 2023
Defendants are nonetheless entitled to 8 qualified immunity because Plaintiff has not demonstrated that the right was clearly 9 established. … to be clearly established.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna