Case law

King v. North Carolina State Board of Sanitarian Examiners

82 N.C. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1986

and remanding the Board’s decisions. … In conducting this review G.S. 150A-51 allows the superior court to affirm the Board’s decision or remand the case for further proceedings. This power is not defined. Harrell v. Wilson County Schools, 58 N.C.

A. A. McKEITHAN & SONS vs. JOHN WALKER & W. J. BROWN

66 N.C. 95 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1872

The judgments were docketed 25th June, 1870 ; the deed in trust from Walker to Brown was made 1st March, 1870. … The estate of Walker belonged to this last class. — Sprinkle v. Martin, this term. The reason why no lien was created in such a case, by the issuing of an execution is thus stated by Henderson, J., in Harrison v.

Times News Publishing Co. v. Alamance-Burlington Board of Education

367 N.C. 782 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 2015

Times News Publishing Co. v. Alamance-Burlington Board of Education

367 N.C. 814 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 2015

Welborn Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Randolph County Board of Education

268 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1966

In Chemical Co. v. … The following application of the law is found in Lacy v.

Faulkner v. North Carolina State Hearing Aid Dealers & Fitters Board

38 N.C. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1978

Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. The County of Robeson, 283 N.C. 494 , 196 S.E. 2d 770 (1973). … The Board’s first assignment of error is overruled.

Porter v. State Board of Alcoholic Control

4 N.C. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1969

We are unable to distinguish the legal principles involved in Sinodis v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 258 N.C. 282 , 128 S.E. 2d 587 , *286 from those presented by this appeal. … As was true in Sinodis , petitioner did not request a hearing by respondent Board, a right expressly accorded her. Hence her application for judicial review must be dismissed. G.S. 143-307; Sinodis v.

Thurston v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment

24 N.C. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1974

State v. Moore, 240 N.C. 792 , 84 S.E. 2d 174 (1954) ; State v. Daniels, 231 N.C. 17 , 56 S.E. 2d 646 (1949) ; Bell v. Nivens, 225 N.C. 35 , 33 S.E. 2d 66 (1945) ; State v. … See Willis v. R. R., supra. In’the case of Roberts v. Stewart and Newton v. Stewart, 3 N.C.

New Hanover County Board of Education v. Stein

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 11, 2022

V. … V.

Clark v. Craven Regional Medical Authority

326 N.C. 15 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 18, 1990

In Shore , a prior action had been instituted, Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, 90 N.C. … The case of Brown v. Lumbermens, 90 N.C. App. 464 , 369 S.E.2d 367 , was on appeal before this Court and argued at the same session of this Court as the case of Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427 , 378 S.E.2d 778 .

Dawson Construction Co. v. Hyde County Board of Education

254 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1961

Topping v. Board of Education, 248 N.C. 719 , 104 S.E. 2d 857 ; Topping v. Board of Education, 249 N.C. 291 , 106 S.E. 2d 502 ; and Board of Education v. Mann, 250 N.C. 493 , 109 S.E. 2d 175 . … The counterclaim as an affirmative pleading should follow the rules stated in Smith v. Smith, supra, and Guy v.

Cooperative Warehouse, Inc. v. Lumberton Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc.

242 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1955

See Warehouse Assn. v. Warehouse (1949), 231 N.C. 142 , 56 S.E. 2d 391 , and Board of Trade v. Tobacco Co. (1952), 235 N.C. 737 , 71 S.E. 2d 21 . Indeed, in Warehouse Assn. v. Warehouse, supra, Devin, J., later C. … Such board may not adopt a rule under such delegated authority which has the effect of substantive law . . .” To like effect are Pue v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 222 N.C. 310 , 22 S.E. 2d 896 ; S. v.

Barney v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

282 N.C. 278 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1972

Brown v. Board of Education, 269 N.C. 667 , 153 S.E. 2d 335 . … Brown v. Board of Education, supra. See also, Garner v. Pittman, 237 N.C. 328 , 75 S.E. 2d 111 .

Falls Sales Co. v. Board of Transportation

32 N.C. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1977

In Highway Commission v. … Thus, the Board should have the right to contract for its protection against an unusual hazard.

Hill v. State Board of Alcoholic Control

17 N.C. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1973

Any one of the two violations found by the Board would support the suspension of petitioners’ permits: C’est Bon, Inc. v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 279 N.C. 140 , 181 S.E. 2d 448 . … The evidence fully supports the findings of the Board as to both violations. Affirmed. Judges Brock and Vaughn concur.

Keiger v. Winston-Salem Board of Adjustment

8 N.C. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 24, 1970

standard established in Jackson v. … The “public interest” clause purports to delegate the power, as the court said in Jackson v.

Pie in the Sky v. Board of Alcoholic Control

305 N.C. 760 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1982

Dependents of Canter v. Surry County Board of Education

201 N.C. 836 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1931

Canter, tbe employee of defendant Surry County Board of Education, was not tbe result of an “injury by accident arising out of and in tbe course of tbe employment.”

Strickland v. Hill

253 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1960

Petitioner, relying upon G.S. 163-143 and Brown v. … In Brown v.

D.P. Riggins & Associates, Inc. v. American Board Co.

796 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 4, 1992

American Board was incorporated under the name Chenango Affiliates, Inc. in 1987. … General Latex and Chemical Corp. v. Phoenix Medical Tech., 765 F.Supp. 1246 , 1249 n. 1 (W.D.N.C.1991); FDIC v. British-American Corp., 726 F.Supp. 622, 629 (E.D.N.C.1989).