Case law

Speciality Risk Services v. Royal Indemnity Co.

213 Or. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 5, 2007

SAIF v. Anderson/DeShaw, 321 Or 139, 149 , 894 P2d 1152 (1995) (quoting Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597, 610-11 , 588 P2d 1087 (1978)). … Co. v.

Bunnell v. Parelius

166 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1941

In Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board , *Page 193 305 U.S. 197 , 83 L.ed. 126 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , Mr. … In National Labor Relations Board v. Columbia Enameling Stamping Co. , 306 U.S. 292 , 83 L.ed. 660 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , Mr.

State v. Day

84 Or. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 1987

Ritchie v. Board of Parole, 35 Or App 711, 717 , 583 P2d 1 (1978), adhered to as modified 37 Or App 385 , 587 P2d 1036 (1978). See Olsen v. State ex rel Johnson, 276 Or 9, 19 , 554 P2d 139 (1976). … Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1, 48 Or App 571, 576 , 617 P2d 665 (1980), rev’d on other grounds 291 Or 77 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brown

262 Or. 171 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1972

The Board of Governors, nine voting, found the accused guilty as charged in seven of the causes of complaint. … The Board of Governors recommended that Neil Brown be suspended b}r the Supreme Court from the practice of law in the State of Oregon for a period of two years. We agree that this is the most appropriate discipline.

Williams v. Wright

432 F. Supp. 732 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 10, 1976

Brown was supervisor of the evening shift at Rocky Butte Jail and had his first contact with plaintiff after coming on duty at 4:00 p. m. on August 14,1972. … Bard Purcell, Director of the Department of Public Safety; John Brown, Chief of the Corrections Division; Stanley Kemer, Jail Commander; and Dan Brown, Corrections Supervisor on the evening shift (“county defendants”). 6

American Federation of State v. Executive Department

52 Or. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 26, 1981

Art VII § 3(a)). 16 In Brown, the California Court of Appeals held that the constitutional responsibility of the state personnel board to classify civil service positions was inseparable from the authority to fix the salaries … In Evans v.

In re Weidner

320 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1994

In Ellis v. … In Stephan v.

Multnomah County Sheriff's Office v. Edwards

361 Or. 761 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 10, 2017

Audio Recording, Senate Education and General Government Committee, SB 822, April 10, 2007 at 47:52 (statement of Paula Brown). … The employer sought judicial review of the board’s decision and asserted, for the first time, that the board lacked jurisdiction to hear med- ical services claims.

Creekside Valley Farms v. Dept. of Agriculture

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 2024

Sachdev v. Oregon Medical Board, 312 Or App 392, 402, 494 P3d 1018, rev den, 368 Or 637 (2021). 578 Creekside Valley Farms v. … Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 356 Or 186, 195-96, 335 P3d 828 (2014).

American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Locals 626 & 2831 v. Lane County Board of Commissioners

45 Or. App. 161 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 10, 1980

In West Linn Education Association v. … But see Fish and Wildlife Department v.

Meier v. Salem-Keizer School District

284 Or. App. 497 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 2017

See State v. … See also Zach v.

Oregon Restaurant Ass'n v. City of Corvallis

166 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 2000

Plaintiffs also rely on deParrie v. … See Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977) (describing characteristics of a criminal law); see also State v.

In re No.

363 Or. 42 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 2018

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board conducted a hearing and determined that respondent had committed all of the charged violations. … The Brown Matter Respondent represented Brown and negotiated a settlement in which the opposing party agreed to pay Brown $6,000.

Creekside Valley Farms v. Dept. of Agriculture

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 2024

Sachdev v. Oregon Medical Board, 312 Or App 392, 402, 494 P3d 1018, rev den, 368 Or 637 (2021). 578 Creekside Valley Farms v. … Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 356 Or 186, 195-96, 335 P3d 828 (2014).

Rostad v. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.

101 Or. 569 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1921

And it was also said that the plaintiff was “boarding one of said street-cars.” … McBride, Brown and Harris, JJ., concur.

In re Portland Electric Power Co.

97 F. Supp. 899 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 16, 1947

Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Company v. Evans, 297 U.S. 216 , 56 S.Ct. 412 , 80 L.Ed. 591 ;. Tuttle v. Harris, 297 U.S. 225 , 56 S.Ct. 416 , 80 L.Ed. 654 . . See Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. … Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, supra, 681; In re Brown, 7 Cir., 84 F.2d 433 ; In re Hasie, D.C., 206 F. 789 .

The Bérengére

155 F. 439 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 12, 1907

Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Mfg. Co., 139 U. S. 199 , 11 Sup. Ct. 500, 35 L. Ed. 147 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hall, 124 U. S. 444 , 8 Sup. Ct. 577, 31 L. Ed. 479 ; Hockersmith v. Hanley, 29 Or. 27 , 44 Pac. 497 . … “The liability of the vessel,” says Brown, District Judge, in The Giulio (C.

Bice v. Or. Bd. of Psychology

296 Or. App. 194 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 21, 2019

. *195 This judicial review proceeding under the Administrative Procedures Act is before us for the second time, following a remand to the Board of Psychologist Examiners. See Bice v. … We agree that the board impermissibly made new findings on remand without identifying or explaining those findings, as required by ORS 183.650(2). See Robin v. Teacher Standards and Practices Comm. , 291 Or.

McAdam v. Royce

202 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1954

See Ervast v. Sterling, 156 Or 432, 439 , 68 P2d 137 , and Oregon precedents therein cited. See, also, State v. Morrow, 158 Or 412 , 75 P2d 737 , 76 P2d 971 ." Birks v. … It reads as follows: "The court erred in not granting the request of defendants Royce and Brown to have the markings on a black board that was extensively used by a witness (and by following witnesses) put upon paper so as

Warner v. Synnes

114 Or. 451 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1924

Morgan, Fliedner & Boyce, 66 Or. 9 ( 131 Pac. 314 , 134 Pac. 1037 ); Tamm v. Sauset, 67 Or. 292 ( 135 Pac. 868 , L. R. A. 1917D, 988); Woodard v. A. F. Coats Lumber Co., 97 Or. 302 ( 191 Pac. 668 ); McCauley v. … J., and Brown and Coshow, JJ., concur. Former opinion adhered to on rehearing April 7, 1925.