Case law

Sigma Construction Co. v. Guilford County Board of Education

144 N.C. App. 376 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 2001

A school board is a “public body” and therefore must hold its meetings in conformity with the open meetings law. N.C.G.S. § 143-318.10(b) (1999). … Multimedia Publ’g of N.C., Inc. v. Henderson County, 136 N.C. App. 567, 575-76 , 525 S.E.2d 786, 792 , disc. review denied, 351 N.C. 474 , 543 S.E.2d 492 (2000).

Cubbage v. Board of Trustees of N.C. State University Endowment Fund

367 N.C. 830 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 2014

State Board of Education v. Roanoke Railroad & Lumber Co.

158 N.C. 313 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1912

Board of Education v. Makely, 139 N. C., 34 . … Revisal, 4047; Board of Education v. Makely, supra. Tbe prayers of tbe defendant so far as they were correct were given in substance in tbe charge.

Scott v. Board of Missions North Carolina Annual Conference

252 N.C. 443 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1960

In the case of Construction Co. v. … Thomas, 237 Mich. 236 , 211 N.W. 666 ; Shaffer v. Temple Beth Emeth, 198 App. Div. 607 , 190 N.Y.S. 841 ; Busch v. Johnstone, 107 Fla. 631 , 145 So. 872 ; Struck v. Kohler, 187 Ky. 517 , 219 S.W. 435 . In Struck v.

ROSSER BY AND THROUGH BROWN v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

947 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 26, 1996

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp., 759 F.2d 355, 364 (4th Cir.1985). … Burris Chem. v. USX Corp., 10 F.3d 243, 247 (4th Cir.1993).

Fike v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

53 N.C. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1981

Meachan v. Montgomery County Board of Education, 47 N.C. App. 271, 277-78 , 267 S.E. 2d 349, 353 (1980). … See Henderson v. Gill, 229 N.C. 313 , 49 S.E. 2d 754 (1948). As recognized in the recent opinion of Meachan v. Montgomery County Board of Education, *82 47 N.C.

Board of Directors of Queens Towers Homeowners' Ass'n v. Rosenstadt

214 N.C. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2011

See, e.g., Carolina Forest Ass’n, Inc. v. White, 198 N.C. App. 1, 3 , 678 S.E.2d 725, 727 (2009) (“As is typical of many property owners associations . . . … See Harllee v. Harllee, 151 N.C.

Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Hall

49 N.C. App. 179 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1980

Brown v. Board of Education, 269 N.C. 667 , 153 S.E. 2d 335 (1967); In re Vinson, 42 N.C. App. 28 , 255 S.E. 2d 644 (1979); Ply-Marts, Inc. v. Phileman, 40 N.C. App. 767 , 253 S.E.2d 494 (1979). … Brown v. Board of Education, supra. By his exception to the entry of the judgment, the defendant does raise the question whether the facts found support the conclusions of law and judgment entered. Hinson v.

Mann v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners in Optometry

206 N.C. 853 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1934

Faw v. Whittington, 12 N. C., 321; R. R. v. McGuire, 171 N. C., 211, 88 S. E., 337 ; Harper v. Battle, 180 N. C., 375 , 104 S. E., 658 . … See Vineberg v. Day, 152 N. C., 355 . Reversed.

City of Greensboro v. Guilford County Board of Elections

120 F. Supp. 3d 479 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 23, 2015

See, e.g., Martin v. … Redistricting In Reynolds v.

Brevard Light & Power Co. v. Board of Light & Water Commissioners

151 N.C. 558 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1909

, shall be obligatory upon and be in law considered as if done by the board of aldermen of the city of Concord; and said board of commissioners shall, for the city of Concord, take and hold the land, real estate, rights, … In Jones v.

Humphrey v. Sinnott

84 N.C. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1987

Brown Route 2, Box 74 Frankfurt, Delaware Defendant, relying on Philpott v. … Accordingly we hold that the summons in this case was sufficient to bring defendant Brown within the jurisdiction of the trial court. See Harris v. Maready, supra. Wiles v.

Fuquay-Varina Tobacco Board of Trade v. Hardin

316 F. Supp. 366 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 5, 1970

Danville Tobacco Association v. Freeman, 275 F.Supp. 350 (D.C.W.Va.) In Border Belt Warehouse Association, Inc. v. Hardin (Fayetteville Division, No. 883-Civil, August 4, 1969), this court, Honorable Algernon L. … Lazar v. Benson, D.C., 156 F.Supp. 259 ; Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc., 356 U.S. 309 , 78 S.Ct. 752 , 2 L.Ed.2d 788 ; Work v. Rives, 267 U.S. 175 ; State of Louisiana v.

North Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Commission

174 N.C. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2005

Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 522 , 507 S.E.2d 894, 895 (1998). When interpreting a statute, the court first looks to the statute’s plain meaning. Frye Reg’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Hunt, 350 N.C. 39 , 510 S.E.2d 159 (1999). … Corp. v. N.C. Bd. of Pharm., 147 N.C. App. 446 , 555 S.E.2d 629 (2001) (finding Act gave authority for Board of Pharmacy to discipline a permit holder for conduct of pharmacist in the filling of a prescription).

Vetco Concrete Company v. TROY LUMBER COMPANY

256 N.C. 709 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1962

Walker v. Brown, 28 Ill. 378 , 81 Am. Dec. 287 ; Massachusetts General Hospital v. Fairbanks, 129 Mass. 78 , 37 Am. Rep. 303 ; Sullivan v. Detroit, Y. & A.A. R. Co., 135 Mich. 661 , 98 N.W. 756 , 64 L.R.A. 673 , 106 Am. … part of the boarders to pay *715 each for his own board.

Kenan v. Board of Adjustment of Town of Chapel Hill

13 N.C. App. 688 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1972

Ordinance, Section 4-D-6. *692 In Jackson v. … The petitioner has the burden of satisfying the Board that it meets these conditions. Craver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 267 N.C. 40 , 147 S.E. 2d 599 (1966).

Atkins v. . Steed

208 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1935

Lucas v. Bank , 206 N.C. 909 , 174 S.E. 301 ; Grady v. Warren , 201 N.C. 693 , 161 S.E. 319 ; Shuford v. Yarbrough , 198 N.C. 5 , 150 S.E. 618 ; Bank v. Angelo , 193 N.C. 576 , 137 S.E. 705 ; Rose v. … Lucas v. Bank, supra . The case of Hodgin v.

Welborn Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Randolph County Board of Education

268 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1966

In Chemical Co. v. … The following application of the law is found in Lacy v.

King v. North Carolina State Board of Sanitarian Examiners

82 N.C. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1986

and remanding the Board’s decisions. … In conducting this review G.S. 150A-51 allows the superior court to affirm the Board’s decision or remand the case for further proceedings. This power is not defined. Harrell v. Wilson County Schools, 58 N.C.

Thurston v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment

24 N.C. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1974

State v. Moore, 240 N.C. 792 , 84 S.E. 2d 174 (1954) ; State v. Daniels, 231 N.C. 17 , 56 S.E. 2d 646 (1949) ; Bell v. Nivens, 225 N.C. 35 , 33 S.E. 2d 66 (1945) ; State v. … See Willis v. R. R., supra. In’the case of Roberts v. Stewart and Newton v. Stewart, 3 N.C.