Case law

United Transportation Union v. Surface Transportation Board

108 F.3d 1425 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 21, 1997

Louis Mackall, V, Attorney, Surface Transportation Board, Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondents, with whom Henri F. Rush, General Counsel, was on the brief. John J. Powers, III and Robert J. … See UTU v.

Elam v. National Labor Relations Board

395 F.2d 611 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 21, 1968

ELAM, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, A. H. Belo Corporation, Intervenor. A. H. BELO CORPORATION, Petitioner, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Lewis E. … reported at 165 NLRB No. 8 (1967) 3 NLRB v.

O'Dovero v. National Labor Relations Board

193 F.3d 532 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 26, 1999

Prosecutorial decisions by the Regional Director and General Counsel are not adjudications and have no preclusive effect on future actions of the Board. NLRB v. … Petitioner's contention that the Board erred by failing to undertake a partial closing analysis under Textile Workers v. Darlington Mfg.

Order of Railway Conductors of America v. National Mediation Board

141 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1944

We are of opinion the motion must be granted on the authority of the decision of the Supreme Court in Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 . … Clerks etc., v.

Pennsylvania State Education Association-Nea v. National Labor Relations Board

79 F.3d 139 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 1996

Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 464 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). Given that “the Board draws on a fund of knowledge and expertise all its own,” NLRB v. … Workers v.

Jerry K. Clark v. Dr. Harold Brown, Secretary of the Air Force

414 F.2d 1159 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1969

Podewils v. National Labor Relations Board

274 F.3d 536 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 28, 2001

The inferences the Board draws from the evidence are quite unreasonable and there- fore under Allentown Mack Sales & Servs. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 378 (1998), the Board's finding must be rejected. … See also Warshawsky & Co. v. NLRB, 182 F.3d 948, 953 (D.C. Cir. 1999). First there is an internal contradiction in the Board's decision. It purported not to disturb the ALJ's credibility findings.

United States Testing Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

160 F.3d 14 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1999

, and because the Board failed to find that the individual claims experience was confidential and protected from disclosure under Detroit Edison Co. v. … The court applies the familiar substantial evidence test to the Board’s findings of fact and application of law to the facts, see NLRB v. United Ins.

Manorcare of Kingston PA, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

823 F.3d 81 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 2016

Opinion filed for the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN. … II We review the Board’s findings under a deferential standard, NLRB v. Downtown Bid Servs.

New York-New York, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

676 F.3d 193 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2012

But this Court concluded that the Board had not adequately explained its reasoning. See New York New York, LLC v. NLRB, 313 F.3d 585, 588 (D.C.Cir.2002). … New York New York, LLC v. NLRB, 313 F.3d 585, 590 (D.C.Cir.2002).

Mike-Sell's Potato Chip Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

623 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 24, 2015

The Board cross-petitions for enforcement of its order. “Judicial review of NLRB unfair labor practice findings is limited.” Douglas Foods Corp. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 1056,1061 (D.C.Cir.2001). … Credibility determinations made by the administrative law judge (ALJ) and adopted by the Board will be “accept[ed] ... unless they are patently insupportable.” ' NLRB v.

Donnelly Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review Board

520 A.2d 270 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1987

Moreover, we accord substantial weight to the Review Board’s determination that its procedures are fair. Mathews v. … Le Sueur County Board of Commissioners, 277 N.W.2d 404, 405 (Minn.1979); Barton Contracting Co. v. City of Afton, 268 N.W.2d 712 -16 (Minn.1978). But see Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v.

Thompson v. District of Columbia

530 F.3d 914 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2008

Murasky, Deputy Solicitor General.  2 Before: GINSBURG, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … BROWN, Circuit Judge: James A.

North American Van Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

869 F.2d 596 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1989

See, e.g., NLRB v. United Ins. … NLRB v. United Ins.

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

403 A.2d 314 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1979

P. v. … See D.C.Code 1973, § 1-1510; Kopff v. District of Columbia ABC Board, supra at 1383.

Chauffeurs, Teamsters, No. 175 v. National Labor Relations Board

294 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1961

294 F.2d 261 111 U.S.App.D.C. 65 CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 175, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. … MILLER, Chief Judge (dissenting). 4 My view is that the Board's order should be enforced without modification.

Hart v. Capital Traction Co.

35 App. D.C. 502 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1910

As this court, in the case of Capital Traction Co. v. Brown, 29 App. D. C. 473, *509 12 L.R.A. (N.S.) 831, 10 A. & E. Ann. … It is urged that the instruction here under consideration was given by the court in the case of Capital Traction Co. v. Brown, 29 App. D. C. 473, 12 L.R.A. (N.S.) 831, 10 A. & E. Ann.

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

390 A.2d 1009 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1978

Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516, 518 (1973). … As we recognized in Dietrich v.

Laurel Bay Health & Rehabilitation Center v. National Labor Relations Board

666 F.3d 1365 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 2012

Before: HENDERSON, BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. … Ctr., Inc. v. NLRB, 363 F.3d 437, 441 (D.C.

Ray v. District of Columbia

535 A.2d 868 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1987

Lewis v. District of Columbia, 499 A.2d 911, 915 (D.C.1985). Prior case law has noted that the Act is, in effect, a worker’s compensation plan. Brown v. … Brown, supra, 451 A.2d at 76 .