Case law

Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. v. Board of Adjustment

162 N.J. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 9, 2000

Sica v. Board of Adj. of Wall, 127 N.J. 152, 165-66 , 603 A.2d 30 (1992). … Lang v. Board of Adj. of North Caldwell, 160 N.J. 41, 53 , 733 A.2d 464 (1999).

B.K. v. Toms River Board of Education

998 F. Supp. 462 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1998

In short, “speed is not of the essence” in an action for *473 attorneys’ fees under IDEA. 12 Shanahan v. Board of Educ., 953 F.Supp. 440, 443 (N.D.N.Y.1997); Michael M. v. … Bailey, 839 F.Supp. at 892 ; Grinsted v. Houston Cty. Sch. Dist., 826 F.Supp. 482, 487 (M.D.Ga.1993); Zigmunt v. Board of Educ., No. 91-0118, 1992 WL 220619 , at *3-4 (N.D.Ill. Aug. 4, 1992).

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Curtis

95 N.J.L. 551 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1921

Kali Bari Temple v. Board of Adjustment

271 N.J. Super. 241 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 1994

See Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Tp. of Wall, 127 N.J. 152 , 603 A.2d 30 (1992); Medici v. BPR Co., 107 N.J. 1, 18-23 , 526 A.2d 109 (1987). … See Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603-04 , 81 S.Ct. 1144, 1146 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563, 566-67 (1961).

Board of Commissioners v. Civil Service Commission

137 N.J.L. 72 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 29, 1948

The writ of certiorari now returned to the court brings up for review an order of the Civil Service Commission whereby it “ordered that the action of the Board of Commissioners, the Director of the Department of Revenue and … Bors v. Davis, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 793; Saddle River v. Public Service, &c., Co., 110 N. J. L. 433. The writ is dismissed, with costs.

Rubenstein v. Board of Commissioners of Bayonne

121 N.J.L. 97 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 8, 1938

Sykes v. Heinzman, 100 N. J. L. 12; Seaman v. Strollo, 105 Id. 570; Bogle v. Woods, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 858. The power to dismiss lay with the director and not with the board. Foley v. Orange, 91 N. J. L. 554. … Herman v. Guttenberg, 86 N. J.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Kempkes

10 N.J. Misc. 838 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 2, 1932

State Board v. Buettel, 102 N. J. L. 74; 131 Atl. Rep. 89 . 2. It is argued that the act violates the due process clause of the constitution of the Hnited States. We think there is no merit in this contention. 3. … State v. Braad, 77 N. J. L. 486; 72 Atl. Rep. 131 . The statement that the offense was committed in the city of Paterson was sufficient. Further, no objection on this ground was made at the trial. 4.

Horace Cowan v. New Jersey State Parole Board

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 10, 2026

Brown argued the cause for amicus curiae Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey (Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, attorneys; Raymond M. Brown and Joshua P. … See Garner v.

Santiago v. New Jersey State Parole Board

175 N.J. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 2002

Green v. Passaic County Board of Taxation

131 N.J.L. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 29, 1943

Duke Power Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 122 N. J. L. 589; affirmed, 124 Id. 41. … In Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation and Montana Power Co., 127 N. J.

NICOLAS v. THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 15, 2019

On May 2, 2019, the Third Circuit issued its decision in Sweda v. … (quoting Brown v. Am. Life Holdings, Inc., 190 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 1999))).

Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Board of Review

38 N.J. Super. 547 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 6, 1956

Ludwigsen v. N. J. Dept. of Labor & Industry, 12 N. J. 64, 70 (1953). In this connection also, reference is made to Krauss v. A. & M. Karagheusian, Inc., 13 N. … Consequently it is important for the courts to have the viewpoint of the Division on a particular problem — especially a more or less novel one (see Board of *555 Review v. Bogue Electric Co., 37 N. J. Super. 535 (App.

Hermann & Grace v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

73 N.J. Eq. 415 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1907

Board of Education v. National Union Bank

16 N.J. Misc. 50 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 13, 1938

In Deal v. Sieling, 102 N. J. L. 585, 589; 133 Atl. … Kobinson, the custodian, was not familiar with the signatures of the fictitious payees, nor does it appear that any member of the board knew them or ought to have known them. In Harter v.

Kaprow v. Board of Educ. of Berkeley Tp.

131 N.J. 572 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 8, 1993

Ass’n v. Board of Educ., 96 N.J. 587 , 476 A.2d 1245 (1984). … Kaprow bases that claim on Lavin v. Hackensack Board of Education, 90 N.J. 145 , 447 A.2d 516 (1982).

Spencer v. Middlesex County Board of Taxation

95 N.J.L. 5 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 3, 1920

Snipe v. Shriner, 44 N. J. L. 206. … Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 75 N. J. L. 771, 777.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Curtis

94 N.J.L. 324 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 14, 1920

Carter Brothers v. Camden District Court, 49 N. J. L. 600; Lowrie v. State Board of Dentistry, 90 Id, 54. … This was followed in Board of Health v. Cattell, 73 Id. 516, and Tenement-House Board v. Gruber, 79 Id. 257.

Carol Jacoby v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of The

442 N.J. Super. 450 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 21, 2015

See also Cresskill v. … See Coventry Square, Inc. v.

Yardley v. Essex County Board of Taxation

93 N.J.L. 290 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 5, 1919

Central Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 70 N. J. L. 81. That bonds which are physically located in a state (as were these) constitute property within its governmental authority is now settled law. … “State Tax on Foreign Held Bonds" Case, 15 Wall. 300; New Orleans v. Stempel, 175 U. S. 309 ; Wheeler v. Sohmer, 233 Id. 434 ; Hopper v. Edwards, 88 N. J. L. 471.

Board of Tenement House Supervision v. Bierman

88 N.J.L. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 18, 1916

This writ of certiorari brings up for re- view the judgment and proceedings in an action in the Pirst District Court of the city of Newark begun by the board of tenement-house supervision of the State of New Jersey to recover … a penalty for the violation of paragraph 190 of an act entitled “An act to improve the condition of tenement-houses in this state and to establish a state board of tenement-house supervision,” approved March 25th, 1904,