Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

2.23s

  • Board of Com'rs of Carter County v. School Dist. No. 36 of Carter County

    135 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1928

    This cause is reversed upon authority of cause No. 18274 (Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. School Dist. No. 71 of Carter County). 135 Okla. 248 , 275 Pac. 302 , this day decided.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • White v. City of Del City

    270 P.3d 205 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2011

    (citing Manley v. … City of Durant v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Jefferson County, Excise Board

    189 Okla. 225 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1941

    Following the mandate in Hullum v. R. J. … Sappington v. Board of County Com’rs, 134 Okla. 253 , 273 P. 274 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Ed Hockaday & Co.

    182 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1938

    Citing Fuller v. Brooks, 117 Okla. 252 , 246 P. 369 . In Tway et al. v. … Citing Rittenhouse & Embree Co. v. Brown Co., 254 Ill. 549 , 98 N. E. 971 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schrader v. Bd. of Com'rs Roger Mills Cty.

    187 Okla. 527 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1940

    He relies upon Meriwether v. Board of Commissioners of Comanche County, 150 Okla. 223 , 1 P. 2d 390 ; Levy Bros. v. … Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., supra, and Board of County Commissioners of Blaine County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION

    2014 OK 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 2014

    The Board of Governors has found that the members set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, have not paid their dues and/or expense charges for the year as provided in the Rules. … Box 696 Owasso, OK 74055 Christy Chism Brown, OBA No. 16093 5635 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sinclair-Prairie Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    170 Okla. 519 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

    Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization et al., cause No. 24271, this day decided ( 170 Okla. 517 , 41 P. [2d] 453 ), having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Topeka Bridge & Iron Co. v. Board of County Com'rs

    112 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1925

    See the following authorities: 4 Ruling Case Law, p. 202, sec. 9; Union Trust Co. v. Cuppy, 26 Kan. 754 ; City of Lake View v. MacRitchie (Ill.) 25 N. E. 663 ; Condict v. Onward Const. Co. (N. Y. App.) 103 N. … E. 886 ; Board of Co. Com. v. Topeka Bridge & Iron Co. (Kan.) 198 Pac. 954 . The last decision above cited states the general rule as to the measure of damages in a case like the instant controversy.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Weston v. Shears

    653 P.2d 928 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1982

    Brown, deceased. The appellee, Jack N. … Peters v. Golden Oil Co., 600 P.2d 330, 331 (Okl.1979). . Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Jenkins, 431 P.2d 349, 352 (Okl.1967). .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Davis v. STATE ELECTION BD. OF OKLAHOMA

    762 P.2d 932 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1988

    Clegg v. Oklahoma State Election Board, 637 P.2d 103, 107 (Okla.1981). State legislation that completely bars ballot access by independent candidates will be held unconstitutional. … Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 reh’g. denied, 417 U.S. 926 , 94 S.Ct. 2635 , 41 L.Ed.2d 230 (1974).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Appeal of Moreland

    497 P.2d 1287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1972

    Harris et al. (1941), 191 Okl. 125 , 126 P.2d 988 ; Thompson v. Phillips Petroleum Company (1944), 194 Okl. 77 , 147 P.2d 451 ; Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa v. … Shore (1952), 207 Okl. 381 , 249 P.2d 1011 ; Appeal of Pierce (1959), Okl., 347 P.2d 790 ; Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City et al. v. Puckett (1960), Okl., 353 P.2d 4 ; Brown v. Fraser (1970), Okl., 467 P.2d 464 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-207 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1975

    Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 170 P.2d 200 , 202 (1946). … Superintendent and the Board must act together to enforce this legislation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Northern Oklahoma Butane v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

    69 O.B.A.J. 158 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1997

    Northern requested redeter-mination, and after the increased rate was affirmed, by Commission, Northern appealed to Commission’s Assessment Board. … The Assessment Board confirmed Commission’s action. ¶ 3 Northern, pursuant to § 3-401 of the Act, filed a Petition for Judicial Review in the district court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners of the County of LeFlore v. District Court of Oklahoma County

    435 P.2d 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 7, 1967

    State Bd. of Ed. v. District Court of Bryan County, Okl, 290 P.2d 413 ). … For the purpose of deciding the issue presented here, we think those “Oklahoma County” defendants are in a similar position to that of the hank in Penney v. Bryant, 70 Neb. 127 , 96 N.W. 1033 , quoted in Fisher v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Margerison v. Charter Oak Homeowners Ass'n

    238 P.3d 973 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 21, 2010

    Brown v. Alliance Real Estate Group, 1999 OK 7 , 976 P.2d 1043, 1045 . Summary judgment is not *976 proper where reasonable minds could draw different inferences or conclusions from the undisputed facts. Id. … U.S. v. O'Block, 788 F.2d 1433 , 1435 (10th Cir.1986).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Childers v. Paul

    177 Okla. 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1936

    Rosser, 24 Okla, 588, 103 P. 674 ; Hudson v. Hopkins, 751 Okla. 260 , 183 P. 507 ; Brown v. Miller, 89 Okla. 287 , 215 P. 748 . … See State v. Board of Commissioners of Ellis County, 65 Okla. 273 , 166 P. 423 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bd. of Equalization of Muskogee v. Exchange Nat. Bank

    104 Okla. 93 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1924

    Stat. 1921, secs. 9669 and 9671, which require the assessor to deliver his lists and the board of equalization to meet on the first Monday in June of each year, and that the board is authorized to act on complaints in a summary … In the case of Good et al. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Lincoln County Excise Board

    192 Okla. 683 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1943

    It concedes that under our decision in State v. … It points to certain language in the case of State v. Board of Commissioners of LeFlore County, above, to sustain its contention.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gaddis v. City of Bartlesville

    790 P.2d 1108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1990

    Yarbrough v. … The elements of estoppel are set forth in Walker & Withrow, Inc. v. Haley, 653 P.2d 191, 193 (Okla.1982). . Arthur v. City of Stillwater, 611 P.2d 637, 643 (Okla.1980). . Quinn v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Camplain v. State

    362 P.2d 464 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 24, 1961

    Brown v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 389 , 208 P.2d 1143 ; Leach v. State, 95 Okl.Cr. 237 , 246 P.2d 416 . No such error appears herein. … Maxwell v. State, Okl.Cr., 292 P.2d 181 ; Ex parte Johnson, 97 Okl.Cr. 374 , 264 P.2d 367 ; Ex parte Ervin, Okl.Cr., 266 P.2d 984 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.