Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

3.86s

  • Rogers v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    165 N.J. 599 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 2000

    Petition for certification is granted, the dismissal of petitioner’s appeal is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Appellate Division to determine the need for any transcript of the proceedings before the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. DEJOY

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 12, 2025

    Percella v. City of Bayonne, No. 14-3695, 2020 WL 6559203 at *15 (D.N.J. Nov. 9, 2020) (quoting Nat’? RR. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 122 (2002)). … O’Connor v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Beck v. Board of Adjustment of East Orange

    15 N.J. Super. 554 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 11, 1951

    Board of Public Works, Paterson, 2 N.J. 131 (1949); Lumund v. Board of Adjustment of the Boro of Rutherford, 4 N.J. 577 (1950). … Board of Public Works, Paterson, supra ; Stolz v. Ellenstein, 7 N.J. 291 (1951).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Manalapan Holding Co. v. Planning Board of Hamilton

    92 N.J. 466 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1983

    board or approval by the county planning board by its failure to report thereon within the required time period. … See, generally, Levin v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp., 82 N.J. 174, 179 (1980). And see Lizak v. Faria, 180 N.J.Super. 248 (Ch.Div.1981); Burcam Corp. v. Medford Tp.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Doskovitch v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    103 N.J.L. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 1927

    In Fort Lee Transportation Co. v. Edgewater, 99 N. J. … In Bridgeton v. Zellers, 100 N. J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    89 N.J.L. 57 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 23, 1916

    Rep. 127 ; Erie Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 87 N. J. L. 139; 95 Atl. Rep. 177 . … Public Service Railway Co. v. Public Utility Board, 87 N. J. L. 250.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Moriarity v. Board of Education of Garfield

    134 N.J.L. 356 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 25, 1946

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Jefferson v. Board of Education

    64 N.J.L. 59 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 29, 1899

    Buren v. Albertson, 25 Vroom 72 ; Thompson v. Board of Education, 28 Id. 628. … In the case of Pierce v. School Trustees, 17 Vroom 76 , the facts before this court were sufficiently different from those at issue in the present case to lead to the result there reached.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Amerada Hess Corp. v. Burlington County Planning Board

    195 N.J. 616 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 16, 2008

    In Manalapan Holding Co. v. … See Lake Shore Estates, Inc. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Air-Way Branches, Inc. v. Board of Review

    10 N.J. 609 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 1, 1952

    See McFeely v. Board of Pension Com missioners, 1 N. J. 212, 217 (1948); Handlon v. Town of Belleville, 4 N. J. 99, 106 (1950); Stone v. Dugan Bros. of N. J., 1 N. J. Super. 13, 17 (App. … Div. 1948); Central Home Trust Co. v. Gough, 5 N. J. Super. 295, 301 (App. Div. 1949); Adolph v. Elastic Stop Nut Corp., America, 18 N. J. Super. 543, 546 (App. Div. 1952).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Besler v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF W. WINDSOR

    201 N.J. 544 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 2010

    Besler, Plaintiff, v. … Miner v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Board of Review

    25 N.J. 235 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 24, 1957

    If the Board’s findings are supported by the evidence, then the Dembek and Toth claims are allowable under Bergen Point Iron Works v. Board of Review, 137 N. J. L. 685 (E. & A. 1948). … Hyman v. Muller, 1 N. J. 124, 129 (1948); Laba v. Newark Board of Education, 23 N. J. 364, 380 (1957).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Van Der Vliet v. Board of Commissioners

    112 N.J.L. 39 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 29, 1933

    In Wagman v. Trenton, 102 N. J. L. 492, 495, this court quoted with approval the following statement of the rule in the opinion in Roanoke v. Fisher (Va.), 119 S. E. … In Kolb v. Boonton, 64 N. J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Errington v. Mansfield Township Board of Education

    100 N.J. Super. 130 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 27, 1968

    Harsha had acted for the board. … as members of the board.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hasbrouck Heights Board of Education v. W.J.

    358 N.J. Super. 8 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 2003

    Board of Educ., 116 N.J. 30, 33-34 , 560 A.2d 1180 (1989) (construing predecessor federal act). … C.S. v. Middletown Township Board of Educ., 259 *12 N.J.Super. 340, 342-43 , 613 A.2d 492 (App.Div.1992).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nash v. Board of Adjustment of Morris Tp.

    96 N.J. 97 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 19, 1984

    II A Board of Adjustment and a trial court have the power to grant a conditional variance. We specifically recognized this power in Chirichello v. … We cautioned, however, in Gougeon v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Beecher v. Board of Street & Water Commissioners

    64 N.J.L. 475 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 20, 1900

    The latest judgments on this subject, delivered by the court of last resort, are to be found in Tallon v. Hoboken, 31 Vroom 212 , and Oliver v. Jersey City, 34 Id. 634. … In the elevated railroad cases (Story v. New York Elevated Railroad Co., 90 N. Y. 122 ; Lahr v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carteret Academy v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    98 N.J.L. 868 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 27, 1923

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Patricia J. McClain v. Board of Review (080397)(Statewide)

    237 N.J. 445 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 29, 2019

    McClain v. Board of Review, Department of Labor (A-52-17) (080397) Cynthia M. Blake v. … Russo v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. De Young

    6 N.J. Misc. 231 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1928

    In the cáse of State Board of Medical Examiners v. Lezenby, 1 N. J. Mis. R. 20, it was held that the giving of electric treatments was a violation of the State Medical act. … With refereirce to the giving of electric treatments we feel that we are controlled by the case of State Board v. Lezenby.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.