Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.96s
84 Or. 652 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1917
Kelly, 24 Or. 464 ( 33 Pac. 642 ); State v. Linn County, 25 Or. 503 ( 36 Pac. 297 ); Grant v. Paddock, 30 Or. 312 ( 47 Pac. 712 ); Stoppenback v. Multnomah County, 71 Or. 493 ( 142 Pac. 832 ); Richards v. … District School Board, 78 Or. 621 ( 153 Pac. 482 ).
Cited 4 timesPublishedMuresan v. Philadelphia Romanian Pentecostal Church
154 Or. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 17, 1998
See Brown v. Boise-Cascade Corp., 150 Or App 391 , 329 n 4, 946 P2d 324 (1997); Hickey v. Settlemier, 141 Or App 103, 108 , 917 P2d 44 , rev den 323 Or 690 (1996). … Mauri v. Smith, 324 Or 476, 482 , 929 P2d 307 (1996). In Morrow v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedKlamath County School District v. American Surety Co.
129 Or. 248 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1929
In Reynolds v. … McBride, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished85 Or. App. 261 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 6, 1987
Brown v. J.C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). … See Brown v. J.C. Penney Co., supra, 297 Or at 705 . Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was, therefore, properly denied.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSimmons v. Lane Mass Transit District
171 Or. App. 268 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2000
Brown, 52 Van Natta 5 (2000); Forest G. … He relied in part on Schulz v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOregon School Employees Ass'n v. Rainier School District 13
91 Or. App. 42 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 11, 1988
“The following procedure shall be applicable to all employes of District No. 13 who are hired by the Board. … See Oregon School Employees Association v. Klamath County School District, 9 PECBR 8832 (1986); see also Brown v. Oregon College of Education, 52 Or App 251 , 628 P2d 410 (1981).
Cited 2 timesPublished159 Or. App. 90 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1999
See Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). During the 1992-93 school year, plaintiff was employed by the Lebanon school district as a bus driver on the route that served defendants’ children. … Shirley v. Freunscht, 303 Or 234, 238 , 735 P2d 600 (1987) (citing to Lowe v. Brown, 114 Or 426, 433-34 , 233 P 272 , 235 P 395 (1925); State v.
Cited 25 timesPublished372 Or. 658 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 8, 2024
Brown, 297 Or 404, 417, 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. … Our decision in Brown cited State v.
Cited 67 timesPublished295 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1983
Compare Warren v. Marion County, 222 Or 307, 312-314 , 353 P2d 257 (1960), for a similar slip in numbering ORS sections. … v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Mar 25, 2026
Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 (2005); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 405-06 (2000). … See Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown126 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1928
BROWN, J. This is a suit in equity, whereby the constitutionality of Chapter 89, General Laws of Oregon, 1913, codified as Sections 4652-4679, Oregon Laws, is challenged. … Walz, 42 Or. 109 ( 71 Pac. 662 ); Cobb v. Peters, 68 Or. 14 ( 136 Pac. 656 ); Winn v. Taylor, 98 Or. 556 ( 190 Pac. 342 , 194 Pac. 857 ); Jones v. Waring, 101 Or. 403 ( 200 Pac. 908 ); Wallace v. American Life Ins.
Cited 14 timesPublished762 F. Supp. 1417 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 26, 1991
Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 691 , 95 S.Ct. 1881, 1886 , 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975). See also Brown v. … Meriweather v. Board of Parole, 97 Or.App. 212, 214 , 775 P.2d 340, 341 (1989). 2 .
Cited 4 timesPublished116 Or. App. 29 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 28, 1992
State v. Brown, 115 Or App 327 , 838 P2d 624 (1992). ORS 137.540(2) now authorizes the court to impose a six-month jail term as a condition of probation for a misdemeanor. … Williams v. Board of Parole, 112 Or App 108, 113 , 828 P2d 465 (1992). 5 Jail confinement as a condition of probation vacated; otherwise affirmed. 1 “No ex post facto law * * * shall ever be passed.”
Cited 10 timesPublished281 Or. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 2016
In particular, I disagree that the board’s opinion indicates that it misunderstood the nature of a claimant’s “burden of eliminating idiopathic causes” under Phil A. Livesley Co. v. … See Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile, 311 Or 519, 528 , 815 P2d 1251 (1991) (“[T]he Board should seriously consider the testimony [the ALJ] believes to be reliable.”).
Cited 1 timesPublished271 Or. 132 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1975
He cites State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972), in support of this contention. … State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). Adherence to the language in State v.
Disapproved in part by State v. Heintz, 286 Or. 239 (1979)Cited 25 timesPublishedRinallo v. CAPSA Solutions, LLC
222 F. Supp. 3d 927 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 28, 2016
During her employment Plaintiffs supervisor had the words “Pussy Riot” displayed on the white board in her office. … See, e.g., Findings and Recommendation of Dennis James Hubel, M.J., adopted on June 24, 2008 by Brown, J., James v. Evergreen Intern. Airlines, Inc., No. 07-CV-1640-HU, 2008 WL 2564804 , at *5 (D. Or.
Cited 4 timesPublished6 Or. 258 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877
Browne, esq. … Such was held to. be the law in the case of Dolph v. Barney, 5 Or. 191 .
Cited 3 timesPublished367 Or. 625 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 2021
State v. … Brown, 300 Kan 542, 564, 331 P3d 781, 797 (2014) (explaining that Miller’s rationale did not make a man- datory life-with-parole sentence unconstitutional); State v.
Cited 29 timesPublishedCominco Products, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
243 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1966
Brown v. State of Maryland, supra, at page 440. … Morton Co. v. Board of Review, 15 Wis2d 330, 112 NW2d 914 , and Parrott & Co. v. City and County of San Francisco, 131 Cal App2d 332, 280 P2d 881 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn Re Board of Directors of Tillamook People's Utility District
160 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1938
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, 92 F. (2d) 365; Browning v. Hooper, 269 U. S. 396 , 70 L. Ed. 330 , 46 S. Ct. 141 ; State ex rel. v. Thompson, 315 Mo. 56 , 285 S. W. 57 . Section 12, Art. … In the case at bar, there is a marked distinction in the facts from those in Browning v. Hooper, supra, and Oregon Short Line R. Co. v. Clark County Highway Dist., 17 F. (2d) 125.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna