Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.91s

  • District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. District of Columbia

    866 A.2d 788 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2005

    Carey v. … Leonard v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • International Ass'n of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board

    414 F.2d 1135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1969

    Young’s Super Markets, Inc. v. NLRB, 377 F.2d 463, 466 (9th Cir. 1967). … The substantial nondiscriminatory change in personnel found by the Board, along with the changes in operational structure, negated any such presumption. See NLRB v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Myer, III v. Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2019

    District and TURNER MYER III, ) _ Bankruptcy Courts ) Plaintiff, ) V. ) Civil Action No. 19-1312 (UNA) ) AIR FORCE BOARD FOR ) CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter was transferred

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. United States

    367 A.2d 1316 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1977

    Air Pollution Variance Board v. Western Alfalfa Corp., 416 U.S. 861 , 94 S.Ct. 2114 , 40 L.Ed.2d 607 (1974). See also Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583, 591-92 , 94 S.Ct. 2464 , 41 L.Ed.2d 325 (1974). … Munn v. United States, D.C.App., 283 A.2d 28 (1971); United States v. Brown, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 113 , 114 n.1, 463 F.2d 949 , 950 n. 1 (1972).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service

    790 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 1992

    See United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 , 85 S.Ct. 248, 254-255 , 13 L.Ed.2d 112 (1964); United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 652 , 70 S.Ct. 357, 368 , 94 L.Ed. 401 (1964). … NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., 394 U.S. 759 , 89 S.Ct. 1426 , 22 L.Ed.2d 709 (1969); Excelsior Underwear, Inc., supra. Such a list is integral to the plain meaning and purpose of the NLRA. NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vestry of Grace Parish v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    366 A.2d 1110 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1976

    [Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938).] *1113 See also Wallace v. … See Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 69 App.D.C. 1, 98 F.2d 282 (1938), and Easton Utilities Commission v. Atomic Energy Commission, supra.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Davis Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    2 F.3d 1162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1993

    NLRB v. … NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • 1101 K Street, NW Acquisitions LLC v. DC Board of Zoning Adjustment

    160 A.3d 1174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2017

    Board of Zoning

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. District of Columbia

    520 A.2d 671 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1986

    See Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 441 A.2d 871 (D.C.1980), vacated when we went en banc in Convention Center Referendum Committee v. … See District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics v. Jones, 481 A.2d 456 (D.C.1984).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    377 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 1966

    The Board dismissed the complaint. … Armco Steel Corporation v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 344 F.2d 621, 624 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Jackson Hospital Corp.

    786 F. Supp. 2d 123 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 13, 2011

    Furthermore, the court owes deference in the Board’s choice of proceedings. See NLRB v. … In re Brown, 454 F.2d 999, 1007 (D.C.Cir.1971).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • California Independent System Operator Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    372 F.3d 395 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 2004

    Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 , 115 S.Ct. 552, 554 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994). … In Brown v.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood Of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers And Helpers, Afl-Cio, Local 88, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

    858 F.2d 756 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 30, 1988

    In NLRB v. … NLRB v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board Union v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

    834 F.2d 191 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1987

    Turgeon v. … Porter Co. v. NLRB, 397 U.S. 99 , 90 S.Ct. 821 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 146 (1970), that remedial orders imposing contract terms with retroactive effect exceed the authority of the National Labor Relations Board.

    Cited 107 timesPublished
  • Spectrum Health—Kent Community Campus v. National Labor Relations Board

    647 F.3d 341 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 2011

    On August 17, 2010, the Board vacated its February 2009 decision after the Supreme Court held, in New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 130 S. … Workers v. NLRB, 727 F.2d 1184, 1192 (D.C. Cir. 1984); see id. at 1191 (“[T]he statute requires objection to the Board, and not discussion by the Board, before an issue may be presented in court.”); Alwin Mfg. Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    288 A.2d 666 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1972

    Mazza v. Cavicchia, 15 N.J. 498, 516 , 105 A.2d 545, 555 (1954); see Hot Shoppes, Inc. v. Clouser, 231 F.Supp. 825 *670 (D.D.C.1964), aff'd, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 353 , 346 F.2d 834 (1965). See also 1 F. … Hyman v. Coe, 102 F.Supp. 254, 257 (D.D.C.1952), cited in Hot Shoppes, Inc. v. Clouser, 231 F.Supp. 825 (D.D.C. 1964), aff'd 120 U.S.App.D.C. 353 , 346 F.2d 834 (1965). (Emphasis added.)

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Georgetown Residents Alliance v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    802 A.2d 359 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 2002

    Ass’n v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 605 A.2d 22, 32 (D.C.1992). … “The applicant has the burden of showing that the proposal complies with the regulation; but once that showing has been made, the Board ordinarily must grant the application.” National Cathedral Neighborhood Ass’n v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • A. L. W., Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    338 A.2d 428 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 30, 1975

    See Shay v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 334 A.2d 175 (1975); Salsbery v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 318 A.2d 894 (1974); Dietrich v. … [Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra at 542 (footnote omitted).]

    Declined to follow by Barbour v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 1976 D.C. App. LEXIS 292 (1976)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • George Banta Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    686 F.2d 10 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 15, 1982

    Banta posits the legality of its PRS on the Board decisions in Bio-Science Laboratories, 209 NLRB 796 (1974), and Brown and Root, Inc., 132 NLRB 486 (1961). These cases are inapposite. … Although Brown and Root states that the Board does not require the "displacement" of "old employees" in order to make room for returning unfair labor practice strikers, 132 NLRB at 514 (Initial Decision), nothing in the opinion

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • National Ass'n of Reversionary Property Owners v. Surface Transportation Board

    158 F.3d 135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 22, 1998

    Union Illinois Legislative Bd. v. … National Mining Ass’n v.

    Cited 58 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.