Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1974

10,000+ results

4.49s

  • Brown v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    584 Pa. 126 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2005

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    179 Conn. 755 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Nov 6, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    861 A.2d 258 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    580 Pa. 355 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. New York State Board of Parole

    13 N.Y.3d 916 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Waterloo Brown Derby Restaurant v. Summit County Board of Elections

    34 Ohio St. 2d 259 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1973

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    568 Pa. 427 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 2002

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. New York State Board of Parole

    13 N.Y.3d 770 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • J. Brown v. Philadelphia Board of Ethics, & J.S. Creamer, Jr.

    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 2026

    The Board alleged that For a Better Philadelphia violated the City’s campaign finance laws and Board regulations prohibiting coordination with Brown’s campaign. Id., Exhibit B, R.R. 69a-75a. … City of Philadelphia v. Glim, 613 A.2d 613, 617 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1992); City of Philadelphia v. Brown, 618 A.2d 1236, 1238-39 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    599 Pa. 157 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Elmer W. Brown v. Alaska Industrial Board, Alaska Aggregate Corporation and Morrell P. Totten & Company, Inc.

    224 F.2d 680 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 28, 1955

    In this situation it was necessary that the Board make findings of fact on the following: 1) Whether when Brown’s employment terminated his employer continued to operate and if so whether Brown ceased to work on account of … Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 557 , 61 S.Ct. 719 , 85 L.Ed. 1037 ; N. L. R. B. v. Red Spot Electric Co., 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 697, 699 ; Wayne v. New York Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 132 F.2d 28, 37 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Chatham County Board of Education

    187 N.C. App. 274 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2007

    See Koufman v. … See Bruce-Terminix Co. v. Zurich Ins. Co., 130 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    1 N.J. Misc. 591 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1923

    Mowery v. Camden, 49 N. J. L. 106. … We conclude that a writ should issue at this time, but that the allocatur should not stay the progress of the proceedings before the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown-Scott v. Hartford Board of Education

    51 F. App'x 70 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 22, 2002

    Brown-Scott appeals from the January 31, 2001 grant of summary judgment for the Hartford Board of Education on Brown-Scott’s claim of retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. 1 Brown-Scott argues that the district … In 1998, the Hartford Board of Education discharged Brown-Scott on the ground of poor work performance. In 1999, the CCHR determined that her 1997 claim was without merit.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    348 Or. 669 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2010

    237 P.3d 824 (2010) 348 Or. 669 BROWN v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S058569). Supreme Court of Oregon. August 18, 2010. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    227 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 2009

    App. 642 BROWN v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Court of Appeals of Oregon. April 22, 2009. Affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Brown v. United States Board of Parole

    443 F. Supp. 477 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1977

    Brown will be suitable for parole, absent *480 new information or institutional misconduct.” … See Zannino v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Board of Review

    126 N.J. 314 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 27, 1991

    Petition for certification granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration in the *315 light of Brambila v. Board of Review, 124 N.J. 425 , 591 A.2d 605 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Board of Fire

    11 N.J. Misc. 943 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 5, 1933

    Gory v. Jackson, 76 N. J. L. 387; 74 Atl. Rep. 658 . … Ayers v. Newark, 49 N. J. L. 179; 6 Atl. Rep. 659 ; Capone v. Union County Park Commission, 9 N. J. Mis. R. 1105; 156 Atl. Rep. 782 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    267 N.C. 740 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1966

    Fields v. Durham City Board of Education, 251 N.C. 699 , 111 S.E. 2d 910 . In Huff v. … G.S. 143-291 through 143-300.1. * * * ’ ” Fields v. Board of Education, 251 N.C. 699 , 111 S.E. 2d 910 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.