Case law

Hochfeld v. Portland

97 Or. 572 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1920

The original briefs in this case merely referred to the briefs in the cases of Brown v. Portland, the opinion to be found post, p. 600 ( 190 Pac. 722 ), and Cook v. Portland, post, p. 000 ( 190 Pac. 726 ). … Justice Brown not sitting.

In Re Flores

119 Or. 550 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1926

BROWN, J. … For a second time she was examined by a board of competent alienists, and as a result of the hearing the Circuit Court made an order committing her to the state’s feeble-minded institution.

State v. McFall

112 Or. 183 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1924

BROWN, J. We approach the consideration of the question here involved with the presumption that the section of the statute assailed is valid and constitutional. … Brown, 41 S. C. 220 ( 19 S. E. 458 , 23 L. R. A. 410). The legislature has the discretion to classify occupations, taxing some while leaving others alone.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lackey

333 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2002

The accused cites this court’s decision in Baum v. … A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board dismissed two of those causes of complaint at the request of the Bar and concluded that the Bar had failed to prove the other complaint.

Olsen v. State Ex Rel. Johnson

276 Or. 9 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1976

Now, the Intermediate Education District (IED) Board is the district boundary board. ORS 330.080. … The California court relied upon Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 , 74 S Ct 686 , 98 L Ed 873 , 38 ALR2d 1180 (1953), as the classic expression of the principle that education is a fundamental interest.

Phelps v. Parole Board Post-Prison

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 24, 2024

Carden v. Montana, 626 F.2d 82, 83 (9th Cir. 1980). … Page v. King, 932 F.3d 898, 901-02 (9th Cir. 2019) (quoting Arevalo v. Hennessy, 882 F.3d 763, 765 (9th Cir. 2018)).

Hirsovescu v. Shangri-La Corp.

113 Or. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 1992

Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984); Adams v. Knoth, 102 Or App 238, 243 , 794 P2d 796 (1990). … In McCool v.

Holland-Washington Mortgage Co. v. Barton

111 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1924

BROWN, J. Roads of public easement have been the subject of frequent legislation and some litigation in this jurisdiction. … L.; Witham v. Osburn, 4 Or. 318 ( 18 Am. Rep. 287 ); Towns v. Klamath County, 33 Or. 225 ( 53 Pac. 604 ); Fanning v. Gilliland, 37 Or. 369 ( 61 Pac. 636 , 62 Pac. 209 , 82 Am. St. Rep. 758 ); Lesley v.

Cook v. Employment Division

51 Or. App. 307 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 1981

Davidson v. Employment Division, 51 Or App 219 , 625 P2d 162 (1981). That principle is inapplicable here because the agency is an adversary of petitioner in enforcement proceedings. In Brown v. … The Employment Appeals Board concurred.

Kiser v. Holladay

29 Or. 338 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1896

Davis, 24 Me. 375 ; Hart v. Hart’s Administrator, 41 Mo. 445 ; Schwarz v. Schwarz, 26 Ill. 81 ; Lewis v. Trickey, 20 Barb. 387 ; Livingston v. Ackeston, 5 Cow. 531 ; Guild v. Guild, 15 Pick. 129 . … .: Andrus v. Foster, 17 Vt. 556 ; Brown v. Yaryan, 74 Ind. 305 ; Moulin v. Columbet, 22 Cal. 510 , and Guild v. Guild, 15 Pick. 129 .

McClaflin v. Wright

107 Or. App. 688 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 1991

Plaintiff's claim is not in the first category in Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or. 21 , 581 P.2d 934 (1978). See Fox v. Zenon, 106 Or. App. 37 , 806 P.2d 166 (1991). … Notwithstanding the repeal [3] of the civil death statute in 1975, Penrod/Brown v.

Wood v. Employment Division

79 Or. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 1986

Brown v. AFSD, 75 Or App 98, 102 , 705 P2d 236 (1985), rev den 300 Or 477 (1986), quoting Cook v. Employment Division, 47 Or App 437, 441 , 614 P2d 1193 (1980). … Germain v. Employment Division, 74 Or App 484 , 703 P2d 986 (1985). Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Seibel v. Liberty Homes, Inc.

85 Or. App. 261 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 6, 1987

Brown v. J.C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). … See Brown v. J.C. Penney Co., supra, 297 Or at 705 . Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was, therefore, properly denied.

OR-OSHA v. Laborworks Ind. / Tradesman Int.

344 Or. App. 66 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 8, 2025

v. … Brown v.

MacVeagh v. Multnomah County

126 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1928

BROWN, J. This is a suit in equity, whereby the constitutionality of Chapter 89, General Laws of Oregon, 1913, codified as Sections 4652-4679, Oregon Laws, is challenged. … Walz, 42 Or. 109 ( 71 Pac. 662 ); Cobb v. Peters, 68 Or. 14 ( 136 Pac. 656 ); Winn v. Taylor, 98 Or. 556 ( 190 Pac. 342 , 194 Pac. 857 ); Jones v. Waring, 101 Or. 403 ( 200 Pac. 908 ); Wallace v. American Life Ins.

Hedges v. Riddle

75 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1915

He cannot pursue both methods: See Brown v. Baker, 39 Or. 66 ( 65 Pac. 799 , 66 Pac. 193 ), and the many cases since decided. 2. The amount that defendants have expended on their pipe-line can have no weight here. … In Wade v.

Sellwood-Moreland Improvement League v. City of Portland

262 Or. App. 9 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 2014

Gage v. City of Portland, 319 Or 308, 317 , 877 P2d 1187 (1994); Gage v. … See Warburton v.

OR-OSHA v. Laborworks Ind. / Tradesman Int.

344 Or. App. 66 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 8, 2025

Workers’ Compensation Board 1900027SH; A181540 OREGON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH DIVISION, Petitioner, v. … Brown v.

State v. Link

367 Or. 625 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 2021

State v. … Brown, 300 Kan 542, 564, 331 P3d 781, 797 (2014) (explaining that Miller’s rationale did not make a man- datory life-with-parole sentence unconstitutional); State v.

Bierly v. Employment Division

44 Or. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 19, 1980

The Board’s decision adopted the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law without making its own findings and conclusions, a practice sanctioned by Skookum Co., Inc. v. … The scope of review by the Board is de novo on the evidential record made before the referee. Stevenson v. Morgan, 17 Or App 428, 431 , 522 P2d 1204 (1974); ORS 657.275; ORS 657.280; see OAR 471-41-005 to 471-41-030.