Case law

Welker v. Annett Bd. of Com'rs Pawnee Cty.

44 Okla. 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Laws 1910), and the rules and regulations of the State Board of Agriculture authorized by these statutes, it was the duty of the defendant county to erect said vat and to have erected said omitted pen, to "dip” the said cattle … See 11 Cyc. 497-500; Board of County Commissioners of Greer County v. Watson, 7 Okla. 174 , 54 Pac. 441 ; Howard v. Rose Twp. of Payne County et al., 37 Okla. 153 , 131 Pac. 683 .

Oklahoma Ex Rel. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. Greer

205 F. Supp. 2d 1273 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 9, 2001

Accordingly, consistent with this Court’s Order in Melvin v. Nationwide Debt Recovery, Inc., CIV-00-212-R (W.D.Okla. Aug. 24, 2000) and the Orders of Judges Thompson and Leonard in Melvin v. … April 5, 2001) and Akin v. Cabrera & Rephen, P.C., CIV-00-158-L (W.D.Okla.

Underwood v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 15, 2025

CIV-24-1266-G ) OKLAHOMA PARDON AND ) PAROLE BOARD et al., ) … See Estate of Schultz v. Brown, 846 F. App’x 689, 693 (10th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, dismissal is required. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

State v. Vaughn

15 Okla. Crim. 187 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1918

State v. Zanger, 9 Okla. Cr. 123 , 130 Pac. 1107 ; State v. Brown, 10 Okla. Cr. 52 , 133 Pac. 1143 ; State v. Carter, 2 Okla. Cr. 706 , 103 Pac. 1042 ; State v. Johnson, 13 Okla. Cr. 133 , 161 Pac. 821 . … App. 211 , 116 Pac. 370; People v. Jordan, 63 Cal. 219 ; State v. Crook; 16 Utah, 212 , 51 Pac. 1091 ; State v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 271 ; Johnson v. Territory, 5 Okla. 695 , 50 Pac. 90 .

Elliott v. Tulsa Cement, LLC

357 F. Supp. 3d 1141 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 11, 2019

DelCostello v. … Second, as to breach of contract, the Petition includes no allegations from which the court may reasonably infer that a contract existed between Brown and Keller and plaintiffs. Cates v.

Cotteral v. Barker

34 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1912

This question was considered by the court in the case of Mitchell v. … The case of Board of Education of the City of Ardmore et al. v. State ex rel.

Citizens National Bank of Oklahoma City v. Banking Board of the State

430 P.2d 794 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1967

include said Board. … See Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil Co., Okl., 394 P.2d 515 ; Stokes v. State et al., Okl., 410 P.2d 59 , and Evans v. Wilkinson, Ex’x., et al., Okl., 419 P.2d 275 . In Garrison v.

Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

182 Okla. 155 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1938

Ed. 1000 ; Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. (Tex.) 83 S. W.2d 935 ; Helmerich &. Payne v. Roxana Petroleum Corp. (Kan.) 14 P.2d 663 . In Blevins v. … See Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., supra, and People v. Associated Oil Co., 211 Cal. 93 , 294 P. 717 .

YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.

404 P.3d 829 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 2017

City of Midwest City, 2015 OK 51, n. 69 , 353 P.3d 532, 547 (justiciability requires the controversy to be ripe for adjudication); Brown v. … Tway, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 1995 OK 129 , 910 P.2d 972, 978 , citing Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , 833 P.2d 1218, 1226 . See, e.g., Apache Corp. v. State ex rel.

Oelerking v. Hiatt

69 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1918

This was a suit begun in the district court’ of Garfield county on May 5, 11917, to enjoin defendants, constituting the board of directors of school district No. 61 of Garfield county, from issuing $15,000 worth of building … The first paragraph of the syllabus in case of Shelton v.

Tillery v. State

23 Okla. Crim. 226 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1923

The motorman testified that the negro who did the killing had on blue coat and trousers and a brown hat; that he was positive of that, as he stood and looked him over from head to foot for about a minute after the shooting … Another witness said he wore a hat and a dark suit, and *231 still another said that the man who. did the shooting wore a dark coat and vest, dark trousers, and a brown hat, but was not certain about the color of his shirt

Fisher v. Superior Oil Co. of California

390 P.2d 521 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1964

In Tulare County v. … Fitzgerald v. Bass, 122 Okl. 140 , 252 P. 54 , 49 A.L.R. 1141 ; Kellough v. Taylor, 189 Okl. 675 , 119 P.2d 556 ; and State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v.

Bynum v. Western Surety Co. of Sioux Falls, S.D.

323 P.2d 972 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1958

Brown and J. N. Netherton and Western Surety Company and The Hartford Accident & Indemity Company, corporations, to recover damages for the wrongful death of her son. … See the case of Lowe v.

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. v. Nunley

176 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1935

Brown of counsel for defendant was more guilty of improper argument than was counsel for plaintiff. In Taylor County v. Olds (Tex. Civ. App., 67 S. … In Big Ledge Copper Co. v.

Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Rose

61 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1916

Co. v. Brown, 32 Okla. 483 , 122 Pac. 136 . That decision, however, became final on March 12, 1912. … On March 25, 1913 (being chapter 94 of the Session Laws of 1913), the Legislature passed an act regulating the running at large of domestic animals, etc., the first section of which reads in part: “The board of county commissioners

Hannan v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Lawton

25 Okla. 372 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1909

People ex rel. v. Kent, 160 Ill. 655 , 43 N. E. 760 ; Boseker et al. v. Board of Com'rs of Wabash County, 88 Ind. 267 ; Hoole v. Kinkead et al., 16 Nev. 217 . Or, as is said in the case of Commonwealth ex rel. … Snyder et al. v.

Nusbaum v. Knobbe

72 O.B.A.J. 1549 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 2001

Paul's cross-claim are not saved by § 100 from the bar of the statute of limitations. 18 The Tenth Cireuit Court of Appeals, applying $ 100, reached the same result in Brown v. … Id. 3 T9 Brown is consistent with Oklahoma case law regarding § 100.

Noyes v. Tootle

8 Okla. 505 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

(Railroad Co. v. Whitbeck, [Kan. Sup.] 48 Pac. 16 ; Wilson v. Janes, 29 Kan. 243 .) And it is strongly urged that, as- it was determined in Mastin v. Gray, 19 Kan. 458 , and in Reynolds v. … It was held in Ryland v.

Petty v. Knight-Petty Merc. Co.

93 Okla. 187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1923

And .the same rule is announced in the ease of Haynes v. Brown, 18 Okla. 389 , 89 Pac. 1124 , Litchfield v. … Plaintiff in error cites the ease of Bently et al. v.

Bond, County Treas. v. Zweigel

130 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1928

Duling v. Bank of Weleetka, supra; Brown, Co. Treas., v. Hennessey State Bank, 78 Okla. 141 , 189 Pac. 355 ; A., T. & S. E. Ry. Co. v. Eldredge, 65 Okla. 317 , 166 Pac. 1085 ; Huber v Akers, 66 Okla. 11 , 166 Pac. 892 . … Treas., et al. v. Carter Oil Co., 88 Okla. 222 , 214 Pac. 922 . In the case of State ex rel. Mothersead, Bank Com’r, v. Bennett, Co.