Case law

Spectrum Health—Kent Community Campus v. National Labor Relations Board

647 F.3d 341 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 2011

On August 17, 2010, the Board vacated its February 2009 decision after the Supreme Court held, in New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 130 S. … Workers v. NLRB, 727 F.2d 1184, 1192 (D.C. Cir. 1984); see id. at 1191 (“[T]he statute requires objection to the Board, and not discussion by the Board, before an issue may be presented in court.”); Alwin Mfg. Co. v.

State Water Control Board v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

61 F.R.D. 588 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 1974

As support for this position, Maryland relies on Illinois v. … In Montgomery Environmental Coalition et al. v.

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

749 F.2d 856 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1984

Thus, we must defer to the Board’s interpretation of its own governing statutes, provided its interpretation has a reasonable basis. See Itel Corp. v. … See Carducci v. Regan, 714 F.2d 171, 177 (D.C.Cir.1983). 7 . See Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 552 (7th Cir.)

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board

757 F.2d 1342 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 5, 1985

PER CURIAM: The Railway Labor Executives’ Association appeals the judgment of the district *1343 court denying the Association injunctive relief and granting summary judgment to the National Mediation Board and the General … of that Act, require the National Mediation Board to make private offices at government expense available to labor members of the National Railroad Adjustment Board.

Benton v. United States

815 A.2d 371 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 2003

We rejected a claim of prejudice resulting from Brown’s perjury as to his qualifications in Whitley v. … that he had a degree in pharmacology and was a board-certified pharmacist.

Club 99, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

457 A.2d 773 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1982

We cannot say that the Board’s invalid rationale represents a “determination of policy,” S.E.C. v. Chenery, supra, nor that it “infected the entire decision.” Dietrich v. Tarleton, supra. … Hence, we uphold the Board’s two-day suspension as mandated by the Board of Education regulation, based upon findings adequately supported in the record. Silverstone v.

Brentwood Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

661 A.2d 652 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1995

Air Courier Conference v. … Clark's Liquors, Inc. v.

Fugazy Continental Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

725 F.2d 1416 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1984

Regal Knitwear Co. v. NLRB, 324 U.S. 9, 14 , 65 S.Ct. 478, 481 , 89 L.Ed. 661 (1945); Southport Petroleum Co. v. NLRB, 315 U.S. at 106 , 62 S.Ct. at 455 ; NLRB v. … Fugazy argues that the Board’s alter ego decision was merely an attempt to circumvent the Supreme Court’s decision in First Nat’l Maintenance Corp. v.

Gibson Greetings, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

53 F.3d 385 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 1995

Belknap, Inc. v. … Local 14 United Paperworkers Int’l Union v.

Sasol North America Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

275 F.3d 1106 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 2002

Id.; see also Medeco Security Locks, Inc. v. NLRB, 142 F.3d 733, 744 (4th Cir.1998); BE & K Constr. Co. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 1372, 1375-77 (11th. Cir.1997); Holo-Krome Co. v. … The Wright Line defense is therefore yet another issue the Board must consider on remand. Cf. McQuaide, Inc. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 47, 50 (D.C.Cir.1998).

Charlotte Amphitheater Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

82 F.3d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1996

We begin our analysis by acknowledging that we owe deference to the Board’s choice of remedy. See NLRB v. … See also NLRB v.

800 River Road Operating Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

846 F.3d 378 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 2017

Before: ROGERS, BROWN, and MILLETT, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by BROWN, Circuit Judge. … Notwithstanding this extraordinary deference, the Board’s discretion “has limits.” Int’l Transp. Serv. Inc. v. NLRB, 449 F.3d 160, 163 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

613 F.3d 275 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 2010

Before: GINSBURG, GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. … .‘‖ Nat’l Ass’n of Gov’t Employees v.

International Brotherhood Of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers And Helpers, Afl-Cio, Local 88, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

858 F.2d 756 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 30, 1988

In NLRB v. … NLRB v.

Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

444 F.2d 969 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1971

United Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 89 , 155 F.2d 169 (1946). … Lake Central Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 239 F.2d 46 (1956); Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 78 , 259 F.2d 808 (1958); Braniff Airways, Inc. v.

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

842 F.2d 466 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1988

The Association seeks review of the Board’s decision. In our prior visitation to this case, we vacated the Board’s decision, Railway Labor Executives’ Ass’n v. United States R.R. … RLEA I, 749 F.2d at 860 (citing Bamberger v. Clark, 390 F.2d 485, 488 (D.C.Cir.1968)). 7 . In March 1985, the Board’s General Counsel submitted to the Board a draft proposal reversing his prior position in L-83-79.

Myer, III v. Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2019

District and TURNER MYER III, ) _ Bankruptcy Courts ) Plaintiff, ) V. ) Civil Action No. 19-1312 (UNA) ) AIR FORCE BOARD FOR ) CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter was transferred

Johnson v. United States

367 A.2d 1316 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1977

Air Pollution Variance Board v. Western Alfalfa Corp., 416 U.S. 861 , 94 S.Ct. 2114 , 40 L.Ed.2d 607 (1974). See also Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583, 591-92 , 94 S.Ct. 2464 , 41 L.Ed.2d 325 (1974). … Munn v. United States, D.C.App., 283 A.2d 28 (1971); United States v. Brown, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 113 , 114 n.1, 463 F.2d 949 , 950 n. 1 (1972).

National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service

790 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 1992

See United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 , 85 S.Ct. 248, 254-255 , 13 L.Ed.2d 112 (1964); United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 652 , 70 S.Ct. 357, 368 , 94 L.Ed. 401 (1964). … NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., 394 U.S. 759 , 89 S.Ct. 1426 , 22 L.Ed.2d 709 (1969); Excelsior Underwear, Inc., supra. Such a list is integral to the plain meaning and purpose of the NLRA. NLRB v.

Vestry of Grace Parish v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

366 A.2d 1110 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1976

[Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938).] *1113 See also Wallace v. … See Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 69 App.D.C. 1, 98 F.2d 282 (1938), and Easton Utilities Commission v. Atomic Energy Commission, supra.