Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersAL

10,000+ results

1.89s

  • Davis Construction Co. v. Medical Clinic Board of Falkville

    406 So. 2d 381 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 30, 1981

    The longstanding rule in Alabama is well-stated by Justice Lawson in Adams Supply Co. v. … See Rule 52, ARCP, Committee Comments ¶ 3; Dicon, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 381 So.2d 18 (Ala.1980); Smith v. McNaughton, 378 So.2d 703 (Ala.1979); Tanner v. Winfield, 365 So.2d 651 (Ala.1978).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ALABAMA SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION v. Jolly

    362 So. 2d 919 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Sep 20, 1978

    In support of its decision the court relies upon statements contained in the decision of the case of Board of Ed. of Marshall County v. Baugh , 240 Ala. 391 , 199 So. 822 (1941). … This court has followed and restated that principle of Baugh in the case of Brown v. Alabama State Tenure Commission , 349 So.2d 56 (Ala.Civ.App. 1977).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • County Board of Education of Coffee County v. City of Elba

    273 Ala. 151 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 21, 1961

    According to the contract, the County Board of Educa-, tion issued $70,000 worth of warrants for the construction of a gymnasium and cafeteria at the Elba school and the city was to repay the board $500 per month for a period … Sidney Spitzer & Co. v. Monroe County, D.C., 274 F. 819 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Town of Lowndesboro

    950 So. 2d 1203 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 12, 2006

    Brown [v. … However, we were not required to address that issue in ABC Board v. Pelham , because we held that the plaintiffs were not otherwise entitled to attorney fees. While we acknowledged in ABC Board v.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Crear

    460 So. 2d 1208 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 10, 1983

    Crear's allegations of denial of due process are all taken from statements in Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). … The case most closely on point among federal circuit court decisions appears to be Walker v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • McDaniel v. Ezell

    177 So. 3d 454 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 30, 2015

    The trial court conducted a jury trial following the procedure outlined in Smith v. Civil Service Board of Florence, 52 Ala. App. 44 , 289 So.2d 614 (Ala.Civ.App.1974). … Vann v. Cook, 989 So.2d 556, 559 (Ala.Civ.App.2008).” MPQ, Inc. v. Birmingham Realty Co., 78 So.3d 391, 394 (Ala.2011).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Monroe Bond & Mortgage Co. v. State Ex Rel. Hybart

    254 Ala. 278 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 19, 1950

    R. v. Browning, 310 U. S. 362 , 60 S.Ct. 968 , 84 L.Ed. 1254 . See, State v. Alabama Power Co., 48 So.2d 445 . … BROWN, LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Alabama Textile Products Corporation

    242 Ala. 609 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 12, 1942

    It is said in Dunbar v. … But we have sustained the power of a circuit court to review by certiorari the ruling of a state board or commission (Alabama Power Co. v.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Louisiana Well Service, Inc. v. Metfuel, Inc.

    614 So. 2d 1039 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 12, 1993

    Brown v. Mountain Lakes Resort, Inc., 521 So.2d 24, 25 (Ala.1988); see Hawkins v. League, 398 So.2d 232 (Ala.1981). … The secretary-treasurer is also charged with “reporting complaints] to the board.” Id. The board has the authority to deny licenses or to revoke licenses. See § 34-8-27; Cooper v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Board of the City of Montgomery v. Norman

    282 Ala. 41 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 8, 1968

    State v. Moore, 269 Ala. 20 , 110 So.2d 635 ; Shaw v. Knight, 212 Ala. 356 , 102 So. 701 . … charge, the board handles sewage from the house.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • BOARD OF WATER AND SEWER COM'RS OF CITY OF MOBILE v. McDonald

    56 Ala. App. 426 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Aug 6, 1975

    Yordan v. Flaste, D.C.Del.1974, 374 F.Supp. 516 . … Drummond v. Drummond, 232 Ala. 401 , 168 So. 428 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Waterjet Systems, Inc.

    758 So. 2d 505 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 14, 1999

    Waterjet Systems, Inc. v. Brown , 736 So.2d 686 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997) (table). For the reasons discussed below, we reverse and remand. … Brown cites several cases in support of his arguments, including Union Springs Tel. Co. v. Green , 47 Ala. App. 427 , 255 So.2d 896 (Ala.Civ.App. 1971), and Luker v. Perry , 351 So.2d 591 (Ala.Civ.App. 1977).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 28, 2022

    Under § 2255(f)(1), the deadline for Brown to file a § 2255 motion was May 31, 2019. 28 U.S.C. §2255(f)(1); see also Downs v. … Brown, 752 F.3d at 1347 (quoting United States v. Peter, 310 F.3d 709, 712 (11th Cir. 2002)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garrett v. University of Alabama at Birmingham Board of Trustees

    223 F. Supp. 2d 1244 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 4, 2002

    Patricia Garrett (“Garrett”) filed her original complaint on January 14, 1997, alleging that while employed by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Board of Trustees (“UAB”), she was discriminated against because of her … Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 , 121 S.Ct. 955 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Legal Environ. Assistance Found. v. Adem

    883 So. 2d 198 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 13, 2003

    The court noted that in Brown v. State , the State had "committed a clear violation of the law in question," and that in Bell v. … P.; Ex parte Riley , 464 So.2d 92 (Ala. 1985); Brown v. Brown , 719 So.2d 228 (Ala.Civ.App. 1998).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. City Commission of Birmingham

    236 Ala. 114 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 21, 1938

    The opinion of the trial court proceeded upon the theory that the act had been previously construed by the “Personnel Board” as not applicable to attorneys who gave part time service to the city, and that this construction … THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., 'concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Oliver v. State

    770 So. 2d 1116 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Apr 28, 2000

    Brown took Oliver back to the coliseum. As this court noted in Bridges v. … State , 636 So.2d 696 (Ala.Cr.App. 1994): "Due process requires that the decision of the state disciplinary board or a hearing officer not be made arbitrarily or capriciously, but be based on some evidence.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • American Ins. Co. v. Newberry

    215 Ala. 587 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 24, 1927

    Jur. 25, § 5, and cases cited in note 65; note to Strong v. Manufacturers’ Ins. Co., 20 Am. Dec. 515 ; Ins. Co. v. Chase, 5 Wall, 509, 513, 18 L. Ed. 524 . As said in the leading case of Waring v. … X, and THOMAS and BROWN; J.J., concur.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Prattville Board of Zoning Adjustment

    976 So. 2d 459 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 22, 2007

    For example, in Bastian v. … Similarly, our opinion in Board of Adjustment of Midland City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alpine Construction Co. v. Water Works Board of the City of Birmingham

    377 So. 2d 954 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 30, 1979

    Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. Highland Terrace Apartments, 352 So.2d 1108 (Ala.1977); City of Albertville, Alabama v. … Poughkeepsie Savings Bank, supra; Otinger v. Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board, 278 Ala. 213 , 177 So.2d 320 (1965).

    Cited 17 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.