Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

2.17s

  • Gordon v. Oregon Board of Parole

    District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 7, 2025

    In Weidner v. … Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170, 181 (2011) (simplified); see also White v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cascadia Wildlands v. Kitzhaber

    911 F. Supp. 2d 1075 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 19, 2012

    The individual members of the Board of Forestry, including the'Chair of the Board of Forestry, are therefore dismissed. V. … Rivers v. Brown, 2002 WL 32356431 , *12 (D.Or. Dec. 23, 2002). In Strahan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Scarratt v. H. A. Anderson Construction Co.

    108 Or. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 1991

    The Board found that claimant had suffered a “temporary increase in * * * wrist symptoms.” Under Barrett v. … The Board concluded that employer’s denial was not unreasonable. Our standard of review is explained in Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Pendleton v. Standerfer

    297 Or. 725 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1984

    We held in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist Ct, 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977), that a conviction for DUII obtained when a defendant was without the assistance of counsel and had not waived counsel was invalid. … With misdemeanor prosecutions, however, the federal right extends only to those cases in which actual imprisonment is imposed, Scott v. Illinois, supra. Article I, section 11 is not so limited. Brown v.

    Abrogated on other grounds by State v. Probst, 339 Or. 612 (2005)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Scoggin v. Schloath

    15 Or. 380 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1887

    (Murphy v. Bank of Mobile, 16 Ala. 90 ; Patten v. Gracie, 68 Ala. 90 ; Houston v. Blackman, 66 Ala. 559 ; Galbreath v. Cook, 30 Ark. 417 ; Carmack v. Lovet, 44 Ark. 180 ; Glenn v. McNeal, 3 Md. Ch. 349 ; Ellinger v. … Elliott, 1 Dev. 76 ; Bank of the United States v. Brown, 2 Hill Eq. 426 ; Glenn v. McNeal, 3 Md. Ch. 349 ; Mayfield v. Kilgom, 21 Md. 240 ; Hindee’s Lessee v. Longworth, 11 Wheat. 199 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. SAIF

    369 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 2022

    v. … See Caren, 365 Or at 472 (citing Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 283, 391 P3d 773 (2017)). With that in mind, we turn to the statutes at issue in this case. A.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Aikens v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    298 Or. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 2019

    That argument, as petitioner acknowledges, is foreclosed by our decision in Morrison v. Board of Parole , 277 Or. App. 861 , 374 P.3d 948 , rev. den. , 360 Or. 465 , 384 P.3d 152 (2016). Affirmed. … Aikens v. Board of Parole , 298 Or. App. 14 , 446 P.3d 79 (2019). That decision does not moot this case because the board will not necessarily find in petitioner's favor on remand.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brown

    250 Or. 37 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1968

    This is a disciplinary proceeding in which the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar has recommended that the license of the accused to practice law he suspended for a period of two years and thereafter until the accused … The record fully supports the recommendation of the Board of Governors. Kenneth E. Brown is suspended as a member of the bar of this state for a period of two years.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Engweiler v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    291 Or. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2018

    Engweiler v. Cook , 340 Or. 373 , 381, 133 P.3d 904 (2006). … [ /Fleming v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Berman v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 2024

    Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1133–34 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 155–56, (1908)). … Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 363 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Poddar v. Department of Revenue

    328 Or. 552 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 27, 1999

    See State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 273 , *563 721 P2d 1357 (1986) (Article I, section 9, requires impartial approval of judicial officer before most searches); State v. … In resolving that claim, the Tax Court, quoting Lora v. Board of Ed. of City of New York, 74 FRD 565, 576 (ED New York 1977), observed that “[tjhe right of privacy is not absolute.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Robertson

    129 Or. 663 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1929

    This was done with the knowledge and consent of the board of directors of the school district. … Brown, J., absent.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Noakes v. Schoenborn

    116 Or. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1992

    Noakes’ objections were not allowed to be presented to the board of directors of FTW. … In Browning v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Stowe v. Ryan

    135 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1931

    *374 BROWN, J. It appears from the order of discharge that Commissioner H. C. … Rotan v. Hasskarl, 21 Pa. Dist.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Walker v. School District No. 1

    159 Or. 177 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1938

    As an expression of my good faith in handing in this resignation, I agree that my present residence shall be open for inspection by the School Board of School District No. … On June 5, 1936, plaintiff’s resignation was presented to the board of directors and accepted by said board. .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.

    349 Or. 348 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2010

    board’s decision and remanded it for reconsideration in light of its opinion in Karjalainen v. … See SAIF v. Sprague, *365 346 Or 661, 674-75 , 217 P3d 644 (2009) (affirming board decision when there was substantial evidence in record supporting board’s factual findings).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Weiker v. Douglas County School District No. 4

    271 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 28, 2015

    See SAIF v. … On review, the parties do not suggest that the board, in analyzing the compensability of the proposed surgery, should have taken a different view of the “compensable injury” in light of our recent decisions in Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lake County Board of Equalization v. Department of Revenue

    4 Or. Tax 25 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 12, 1969

    Bd. of Equal. v. Com. et al, 3 OTR 221 (1968), and will not be repeated here. In the prior case in this court the true cash value of the subject property was established at $2,364,570 as of January 1, 1967. … Qualified and expert appraisers appeared for the Lake County Board of Equalization and the defendant ZX Ranch.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Siegel v. Eugene Water & Electric Board

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 30, 2024

    ANITA BROWNING, DENNIS HOERNER, WILLIAM ZWICKER, VICTOR ODLIVAK, ALISON PRICE, SOFIA DUMITRU, WANDA MECK, LISA-MARIE DIVINCENT, JAMIE WHITNEY, MELINDA STONE, MARSHALL SANDERS, BEKKI BRUCKNER, JOSHUA KORN, TAD PATTERSON … Barcello v. Welch, No. 1:23-CV-137-MOC-WCM, 2023 WL 6307309, at *4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2023); Hirmiz v. New Harrison Hotel Corp., 865 F.3d 475, 476 (7th Cir. 2017); G v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Darragh v. Bird

    3 Or. 229 · Wasco County Circuit Court, Oregon · Jul 15, 1870

    Brown is one of those cases where a person slept in one 'precinct and boarded in another; but, in giving his testimony as to his residence, lie says “I think where Thomas Smith lives is my residence.” … Webster v. Brynes ( 34 Cal. 273 ) is a case in point.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.