Case law

Jones v. State

20 Okla. Crim. 233 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1921

Taylor v. Territory, 2 Okla. … Justice Holmes, in Brown v. U. S., 255 U. S. — , 41 Sup. Ct. 501, 65 L.

Kiddie v. Kiddie

563 P.2d 139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1977

Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 202 Okl. 108 , 210 P.2d 666 (1949) held a party appearing in a dentistry licensing hearing is entitled to employ counsel but not to be furnished counsel. Also see Brown v. … Boddie v.

Feuquay v. McAlister

102 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1924

Beginning in 1899 with Huddleston v. … Stearns v. Sims, 24 Okla. 623 , 104 Pac. 44 ; State ex rel. Shepard v. Crouch, 31 Okla. 206 , 120 Pac. 915 ; McKee v. Election Board, 36 Okla. 258 . 128 Pac. 294 ; Strother v.

Opinion No. 55-1118

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD CAN LEGALLY PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUILDING IN A STATE PARK, TO BE OWNED BY THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, FOR USE AS A CHAPEL BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC WITHOUT REGARD THE

Opinion No. 55-0520

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1955

OPINION — AG — 74 O.S.H. 351(L), THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD WOULD BE WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO GRANT TO THE CONCESSIONAIRE OPERATING ONE OF THE STATE PARKS UNDER CONTROL OF SAID BOARD A LEASE PORTION OF THE LAND

Shepherd v. Hood

185 Okla. 635 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1939

See Skelly Oil Co. v. Ellis (1936) 176 Okla. 569 , 56 P.2d 891 ; Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown (1936) 177 Okla. 317 , 59 P.2d 280 ; Sheffield Steel Corp. v. Barton (1938) 183 Okla. 624 , 84 P.2d 17 . 2. … Heinz Co. v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1953

OPINION — AG — QUESTION: CAN THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOUCES BOARD BE AUTHORIZED TO EXPEND PUBLIC FUNDS FOR THE BEAUTIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CEMETERY OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE OLD BOGGY DEPOT CEMETERY ASSOCIATION

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1951

OPINION — AG — ** SALESMAN — EMPLOYMENT — PUBLIC FUNDS ** THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD HAS AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY SALESMEN TO SELL " TRAVEL POSTER STAMPS " IN THE MANNER AND UPON THE TERMS STATED.

Opinion No. 51-0828

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 28, 1951

OPINION — AG — ** CENTRAL PURCHASING — BIDS ** IS THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD REQUIRED BY LAW TO PURCHASE NECESSARY SUPPLIES, MATERIALS, ETC., INCLUDING PRINTING, THROUGH THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS ?

Opinion No. 52-0920

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1952

OPINION — AG — ** BUILDING — BONDS ** THUS, IF THE USE TO WHICH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES TO PUT SAID FRAME BUILDING BRINGS IT WITHIN THE CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES "WHICH CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED … THE BOARD WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BUY SAID BUILDING UNLESS THE OWNER THEREOF FURNISHED CLEAR TITLE THERETO. (PURCHASE) CITE: 74 O.S. 351 [ 74-351 ] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1955

INCURRED AGAINST ANY ITEM OF APPROPRIATION PROVIDED FOR IN SENATE BILL NO. 369 OF THE 24TH OKLAHOMA LEG AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO DECEMBER 20, 1955, PROVIDED THAT PAYMENT THEREOF BE MADE IN HARMONY WITH THAT PORTION OF ARTICLE V

In re Whiteaker

364 P.2d 1118 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1961

Perry v. Waters, 97 Okl. Cr. 17, 256 P.2d 1119 and Bolton v. McLeod, Okl.Cr., 294 P.2d 586, 589 . … See Application of Brown, Okl.Cr., 297 P.2d 575 , and Application of Degen, Okl. Cr., 359 P.2d 740 .

Soderstrand v. Oklahoma ex rel. Board of Regents of Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical Colleges

463 F. Supp. 2d 1308 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 22, 2006

Eaton v. Meneley, 379 F.3d 949, 954 (10th Cir.2004). … Malek v. Haun, 26 F.3d 1013, 1015 (10th Cir.1994).

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Fortinberry Co.

201 Okla. 537 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1949

Levin v. Hunt, 70 Okla. 63 , 172 P. 940 ; Storm, Adm’r, et al. v. Gar-nett et al., 99 Okla. 284 , 227 P. 417 ; Haynes v. Brown, 18 Okla. 389 , 89 P. 1124 . It was the duty of the Tax Commission to approve the claim. … Co. v. Lein-inger, supra; Board of Com’rs of Seminole County v. State ex rel. Cobb, County Judge, 31 Okla. 196 , 120 P. 913 . Judgment affirmed. ARNOLD, V. C.

Protest of Sweeney

183 Okla. 211 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1938

In the case of Hammels v. Kreig, 240 P. 348 , the Supreme Court of Arizona states as follows: "In Daggs v. … United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Ham, 122 Okla. 261 , 254 P. 100 ; Cannon v. Cannon, 170 Okla. 366 , 40 P.2d 649 . The principle of the rule is applicable here. The motion had no effect.

Fitzpatrick v. McAlister

121 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1926

Trapp’s name to the State Board of Affairs, and to enjoin the State Board of Affairs from having Mr. … Robertson v. State Election Board and M. E.

Opinion No. 71-338 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 9, 1971

Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 . It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the affirmative.

ELIAS v. CITY OF TULSA

2022 OK CIV APP 18 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 2021

BOARD OF EDUCATION Cited 1917 OK 47 , 162 P. 938 , 63 Okla. 52 , ADAMS v. ITEN BISCUIT CO. Discussed 2001 OK 110 , 37 P.3d 882 , 72 OBJ 3672, KEATING v. EDMONDSON Discussed 2008 OK 65 , 188 P.3d 177 , GLASCO v. … SPRINT PCS Discussed 2016 OK 84 , 377 P.3d 138 , OCPA IMPACT, INC. v. SHEEHAN Discussed 2016 OK 89 , 381 P.3d 768 , VASQUEZ v. DILLARD'S, INC. Discussed 2017 OK 13 , 391 P.3d 111 , BROWN v.

Roquemore v. State

513 P.2d 1318 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 27, 1973

This Court stated in Brown v. … He would have to serve the minimum, but then it would be up to the Pardon and Parole Board to figure out is this person reformed?” This type of argument was improper and should not be permitted. See Herandy v.

Dowell v. Board of Education of the Oklahoma City Public Schools, Independent District No. 89

677 F. Supp. 1503 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1987

See also Correll v. Earley, 205 Okl. 366 , 237 P.2d 1017 (1951). In 1954, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. … .”); Pasedena City Board of Education v.