Case law

Den ex dem. Martin v. Brown

7 N.J.L. 305 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1799

Gurnel v. Wood, 2 Eq. Ca. Ab. 342, pl. 21; 8 Vin. Ab. 112, pl. 38. The case of Selwin v. Selwin, decided by Lord Mansfield, and that of Moor et Rex v. Hawkins, by Lord Northington, in Chancery, cited in Roe v. … In the case of Fowler v.

Bound Brook Board of Education v. Glenn Ciripompa (076905)

228 N.J. 4 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 2017

Grover v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., 80 N.J. 221, 231 (1979); cf. Trentina v. … V.

Leonard Investment Co. v. Board of Adjustment

122 N.J.L. 308 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1939

Krumgold & Sons v. … Lutz v. Kaltenbach, supra. The resolution of revocation adopted by the Board of Adjustment is therefore vacated, but without costs.

Sleight v. Board of Education of Paterson

112 N.J.L. 422 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 1934

There is no question raised here, as was raised in the case of Ely v. Mayor of Newark, 76 N. J. … Boards of education have two principal accounts, current and capital. Provision is made by statute for both. Sections 74, 76 of School act, supra. In Townsend v. Board of Education, 88 N. J. L. 97; 95 Atl.

Young v. Bergen County Board of Taxation

5 N.J. Tax 102 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 30, 1982

[at 103, 130 A.2d 847 ; citations omitted] *108 The doctrine of merger, in terms of planning and zoning, was clearly enunciated by our Supreme Court in Loechner v. … See Hackensack Water Co. v.

Murphy v. Ocean County Board of Elections

379 N.J. Super. 461 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 2005

Princeton Tp. v. Bleiman, 71 N.J. 527 , 366 A.2d 682 (1976); Kirk v. French, 324 N.J.Super. 548 , 736 A.2d 546 (Law Div.1998). … Princeton Tp. v. Bleiman, 71 N.J. 527 , 366 A.2d 682 (1976)).

Granata v. New Jersey State Parole Board

237 N.J. Super. 630 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1990

The Parole Board thereupon moved to dismiss this appeal as moot. The defendant opposed the motion, relying primarily upon Bd. of Trustees of Youth Correct. Cent. v. Davis, 147 N.J.Super. 540 (App.Div.1977), and N.J. … However, in New Jersey State Parole Board v.

Sundiata Acoli v. New Jersey State Parole Board(075308)

224 N.J. 213 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 2016

Perez v. Zagami, 218 N.J. 202, 209 , 94 A.3d 869 (2014) (quoting State v. Buckley, 216 N.J. 249, 263 , 78 A.3d 958 (2013)). … See US Bank, N.A. v.

O'NEAL v. New Jersey State Parole Board

75 N.J. 590 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 22, 1977

Meixner v. Board of Adjustment of Newark

131 N.J.L. 599 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 2, 1944

DeVito v. Pearsall, 115 N. J. L. 323; Green v. Board of Commissioners, 131 Id. 336. R. … Dickinson v. Plainfield, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 260; Home Fuel Oil Co. v. Glen Rock, 118 N. J. L. 340. The action of the defendant Board in revoking the permit was a proper exercise of its function under the proof's.

Clayton v. Freehold Township Board of Education

67 N.J. 249 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 22, 1975

State v. Macon, 57 N. J. 325, 333 (1971). … In Roth-Schlenger, Inc. v. Schlenger, 121 N. J.

American Dream At Marlboro, L.L.C. v. Planning Board

209 N.J. 161 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 2012

See Soussa v. … See, e.g., Borough of Princeton v.

PRB Enterprises Inc. v. South Brunswick Planning Board

105 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 8, 1987

Jamouneau v. Harner, 16 N.J. 500, 516 (1954), cert, denied, 349 U.S. 904 , 75 S.Ct. 580 , 99 L.Ed. 1241 (1955); Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. … .” *7 PRB Enterprises, Inc. v.

Arrom v. Board of Trustees

814 F. Supp. 2d 466 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 30, 2011

Syed v. Hercules Inc., 214 F.3d 155, 162 (3d Cir.2000); see also Parker v. … Miller v. Rite Aid Corp., 334 F.3d 335, 340 (3d Cir.2003).

Carteret Academy v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

102 N.J.L. 525 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 2, 1926

Stevens Institute v. Bowes, 78 N. J. L. 205; Montclair v. State Board, 86 Id. 497; Carteret Academy v. Orange, supra. … A. v. Orange, 128 Atl. Rep. 580 ; Mausoleum Builders v. State Board, 88 N. J. L. 592; affirmed, 90 Id. 163.

Board of Education v. Civil Service Commission

99 N.J.L. 106 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 26, 1923

The writ was sued out by the board of education of Newark and one Cephas I. Shirley, the business manager of the board, to test the validity of certain resolutions passed by the civil service commission. … Shirley was appointed business manager of the board on June 26th, 1919, pursuant to authority which, it was assumed, had been conferred upon the board by the General School law of 1904.

Smathers v. Board of Freeholders, Atlantic Co.

113 N.J.L. 281 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 16, 1934

Evans v. City of Trenton, 24 N. J. L. 764. … Ballagh Realty Co., Inc., v. Dumont, 111 N. J. L. 32; 166 Atl. Rep. 491 ; Potter v. Metuchen, 108 N. J. L. 447. The effect of ratification is to impart validity to the original agreement.

Reck v. Board of Commissioners of North Bergen

110 N.J.L. 173 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1933

Coles v. Blythe, 69 N. J. L. 666, 669; Ryer v. Turkel, 75 Id. 677, 683. In Beirne v. Jersey City, 60 N. J. … This was followed in the Supreme Court in Caulfield v. Jersey City, 63 N. J. L. 148, and Stivers v. Jersey City, 70 Id. 606. In Harker v. Bayonne, 85 N. J.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Grossman

134 N.J.L. 401 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 19, 1946

Bound Brook Stove Works v. Ellis, supra; State Board of Medical Examiners v. Citarella, 313 N. J. L. 210, 213, 214; 114 Atl. Rep. 24 ; State Board of Medical Examiners v. Coleman, 132 N. J. L. 64, 66; 38 Atl. … State Board of Medical Ex *406 aminers v. Maza, supra; State Board of Medical Examiners v. Coleman, supra; Kahn v. Metropolitan Life Insuarnce Co., supra (at p. 506).

Curry v. New Jersey State Parole Board

309 N.J. Super. 66 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1998

U.S. v. … North Carolina v. Pearce, supra, 395 U.S. at 723-24 , 89 S.Ct. at 2079 , 23 L.Ed.2d at 668 ; State v.