Case law

In Re Powell

27 B.R. 146 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 17, 1983

Compare Brown v. … The Courts are divided as to whether proceedings before the Labor Board are stayed by a bankruptcy. Compare NLRB v.

Opinion No. 159-81 (1981)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 24, 1981

for payment of travel expenses by members of the board and their employees when the travel expenses are computed in excess of seventeen cents per mile. … No. 112 5/23/80, Brown

State ex rel. City of Fulton v. Hamilton

941 S.W.2d 785 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1997

Brown v. Tate, 888 S.W.2d 413, 414 (Mo.App.1994). As such, the officer has the benefit of the doctrine, which acts as a shield against liability from torts arising out of discretionary acts. Fonseca v. … Brown, 888 S.W.2d at 415 . A police officer responding to an emergency call, however, is performing a discretionary function. Bachmann v. Welby, 860 S.W.2d 31, 34 (Mo.App.1993).

Shelton v. Annuity Board of the Southern Baptist Convention

915 F. Supp. 124 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 20, 1996

Co. v. Null, 554 F.2d 896, 901 (8th Cir.1977). … Most of materials related to the Plan were forwarded from defendant Annuity Board in Texas to the plaintiff. It is not clear, but it appears that premiums were paid to defendant Annuity Board (in Texas).

Condemnation of Land in West Park District Under Kansas City Ordinance No. 37008 v. Boruff

295 Mo. 28 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 26, 1922

Co. v. Walsh, 197 Mo. 392 . … Co. v.

State ex rel. Klawuhn v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of St. Joseph

952 S.W.2d 725 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1997

Tucker v. McDonald, 793 S.W.2d 616, 618 (Mo.App.1990); Ogawa v. City of Des Peres, 745 S.W.2d 238, 242-43 (Mo.App.1987); Brown v. … Wrenn v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 923 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1996), the ZBA argues because Ms.

State Ex Rel. Capps v. Bruns

353 S.W.2d 829 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1962

See Brown et al. v. Gambrel et al., Mo., 213 S.W.2d 931, 935 . In addition, General Ordinance 3162, Sec. 11-21, City of St. Joseph, squarely authorizes such continuing nonconforming use. In Braun et al. v. … The Court ruled petitioner had the right to continue the business without approval of the Board. In Campbell et al. v.

State ex rel. O'Connell v. Board of President of St. Louis Public Schools

112 Mo. 213 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 15, 1892

These sections of the constitution were construed in State ex rel. v. … State ex rel. v. Miller, 100 Mo. 439 ; Heller v. Stremmel, 52 Mo. 309 ; State to use v. Tiedemann, 69 Mo. 306 ; State *219 ex rel. v. Tracy, 94 Mo. 217 ; Buchanan v. School District, 25 Mo. App. 85 ; Roach v.

Daugherty v. Poundstone

120 Mo. App. 300 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1906

Brown were merely executory, had no relation to the management of the bank, and therefore cannot be classed with transactions that in the regular course of things should have come under the observation of the board of directors … [Bank v. Hill, 148 Mo. 380 , and authorities cited.] Before proceeding to a discussion of the second question propounded, we will determine the question of the cashier’s negligence.

State Ex Rel. Wingfield v. Kansas City

217 Mo. App. 288 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1924

[Drainage District v. County, 189 S. W. 1176 , 269 Mo. 78 , and the same parties, 216 S. W. 949 ; Brown v. Railroad, 198 Mo. App. 71 .] We therefore hold against the contention of defendants on this point. … As is said in Davis v.

Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Missouri Real Estate Commission

712 S.W.2d 666 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1986

In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), the Supreme Court of the United States outlawed racial segregation in the public schools of the states. In Cooper v. … The statute in question was substantially the same as the statute held unconstitutional in Virginia Pharmacy Board v.

Sinquefield v. Jones

435 S.W.3d 674 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2014

Brown v. Carnahan, 370 S.W.3d 637, 645 (Mo. banc 2012) (quoting Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process v. Blunt, 799 S.W.2d 824, 827 (Mo. banc 1990) (citing Mo. Const., art. … Brown v. Carnahan, 370 S.W.3d at 649 .

Otis v. Browning

59 Mo. App. 326 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1894

Waugh gave the deed thus executed into the hands of Otis with authority to fill the blank as to the name of the grantee, and then we may well say, as was said in Field v. … In view, then, of these facts, can it be said that Browning got nothing from Otis?

Charlesworth v. Jacob

224 Mo. App. 1014 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1930

Charlesworth, plaintiff, v. Blanch E. Jacob and F. E. Jacob, defendants, Hattie Morris Brown, interpleader. … [See Kortjohn v. Seimers, 29 Mo. App. 271, 276 ; Browning v. Hilig, 69 Mo. App. 594, 596 ; Addison v. Dent Co. Savs. Bank, 205 Mo. App. 622 ; State ex rel. v. Ry. Co., 193 S. W. 932 ; Skinner v. Slater, 159 Mo.

Thompson v. Southwest School District

483 F. Supp. 1170 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 18, 1980

In Drake v. Covington Board of Education, 371 F.Supp. 974 (M.D.Ala.1974), plaintiff was terminated by a school board for “immorality”. … Further, the school board president indicated that plaintiff’s teaching ability had never been an issue and was not disputed. The factual situation here differs from the circumstances of Brown v.

Missouri Division of Employment Security v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission

651 S.W.2d 145 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1983

Brown v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, 577 S.W.2d 90 (Mo.App.1978); Bussmann Mfg. Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, 327 S.W.2d 487, 491 (Mo.App.1959); Kroger Co. v. … We find no substantial evidence to support the Board of Review’s decision, and this case is reversed and remanded. Terry v.

Suarez v. Thompson

283 S.W.2d 584 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1955

Wilbur Johnson Brown testified in behalf of plaintiff. He is a telephone clerk in the employ of defendant, tie boarded train No. 7 at Tower Grove Station in St. Louis *586 en route to Texarkana on the night Mrs. … The law is clear that any such presumption disappeared from the case when Williams and Brown testified to the contrary. 31 C.J.S., Evidence, § 124, p. 738; Michler v.

American Aberdeen Angus v. Stanton

762 S.W.2d 501 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1988

Browning-Ferris Indus. of Kansas City, Inc. v. Dance, 671 S.W.2d 801, 808 (Mo.App.1984). … Co. v. Moniteau County, 357 Mo. 448, 456 , 209 S.W.2d 127, 131 (1948); County of Bollinger v. Ladd, 564 S.W.2d 267, 270 (Mo.App.1978).

Jones v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

115 Mo. App. 232 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1905

[Sloan & Co. v. Railroad, 58 Mo. 220 ; Potts v. Railway, 17 Mo. App. 394 ; Brown v. Railway, 18 Mo. App. 568 ; Popham v. Barnard, 77 Mo. App. 626 .] A case squarely in point is Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Ry. … Co. v.

Rousey v. Wood

47 Mo. App. 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1892

Robinson v. James, 71 Mo. 582 ; State v. Hays, 78 Mo. 600 ; City of Hopkins v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 100 ; Spurlock v. Dougherty, 81 Mo. 171 . … Walker v. Likens, 24 Mo. 298 ; Wyatt v. Thomas, 29 Mo. 23 ; Howard v. Clark, 43 Mo. 348 ; Dunbar v. Wightman, 51 Mo. 432; Brown v. Harris, 52 Mo. 306; Melcher v. Scruggs, 72 Mo. 406 .