Case law

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1955

INCURRED AGAINST ANY ITEM OF APPROPRIATION PROVIDED FOR IN SENATE BILL NO. 369 OF THE 24TH OKLAHOMA LEG AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO DECEMBER 20, 1955, PROVIDED THAT PAYMENT THEREOF BE MADE IN HARMONY WITH THAT PORTION OF ARTICLE V

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1953

OPINION — AG — QUESTION: CAN THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOUCES BOARD BE AUTHORIZED TO EXPEND PUBLIC FUNDS FOR THE BEAUTIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CEMETERY OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE OLD BOGGY DEPOT CEMETERY ASSOCIATION

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1951

OPINION — AG — ** SALESMAN — EMPLOYMENT — PUBLIC FUNDS ** THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD HAS AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY SALESMEN TO SELL " TRAVEL POSTER STAMPS " IN THE MANNER AND UPON THE TERMS STATED.

Opinion No. 55-1118

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD CAN LEGALLY PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUILDING IN A STATE PARK, TO BE OWNED BY THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, FOR USE AS A CHAPEL BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC WITHOUT REGARD THE

Opinion No. 55-0520

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1955

OPINION — AG — 74 O.S.H. 351(L), THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD WOULD BE WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO GRANT TO THE CONCESSIONAIRE OPERATING ONE OF THE STATE PARKS UNDER CONTROL OF SAID BOARD A LEASE PORTION OF THE LAND

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 5, 1989

PERRY V. SINDERMANN, 408 U.S. 593 (1970); AND BOARD OF REGENTS V. ROTH, 408 U.S. 564 (1972). … BROWN V. REARDON, 770 F.2D 896, 904-905 (10TH CIR. 1985). THE U.S.

Jones v. State

20 Okla. Crim. 233 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1921

Taylor v. Territory, 2 Okla. … Justice Holmes, in Brown v. U. S., 255 U. S. — , 41 Sup. Ct. 501, 65 L.

Opinion No. 53-0821

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1953

OPINION — AG — THE LANGUAGE OF 74 O.S. 356 .6 [ 74-356.6 ] (BONDS SHALL BE AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD (OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) SHALL BE AT A PERCENTAGE RATE) MAY LEGALLY SELL THE PARK IMPROVEMENT BONDS REFERRED

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 4, 1957

OPINION — AG — ** TOURIST — EXPENSES — FACILITIES ** (1) A CONTRACT SUCH AS THAT DESCRIBED IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THIS LETTER IS WITHIN THE LEGAL AUTHORITY OF THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD; AND THAT SUCH A … CONTRACT WOULD BE PROPERLY CHARGEABLE AGAINST AN UNENCUMBERED BALANCE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED TO THE APPROPRIATION HEREINABOVE MENTIONED, OR AGAINST FUNDS CONTRIBUTED TO THE BOARD FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADVERTISING AND PUBLICIZING

Opinion No. 52-1023

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 23, 1952

Opinion No. 55-0709

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1955

AG HAS UNDER CONSIDERATION THE PROPOSED CONTRACT BETWEEN THE MARMON ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, A COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION OF HOLLIS, OKLAHOMA AND THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 21, 1956

MODIFICATION — LEASE — CONTRACT ** OPINION DEALING WITH: MODIFICATION OF ITS LEASE COVERING THE LODGE AND CABINS AND CERTAIN OTHER CONCESSIONS AT SEQUOYAH STATE PARK, AND IN WHICH LETTER NEEDED AN OPINION TO WHAT AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD … (OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) TO ENTER INTO SUCH AN AGREEMENT.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE FIRST FISCAL YEAR MENTIONED IN SAID ACT (SENATE BILL NO. 369 — APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) HAVING EXPIRED. . . … THAT OBLIGATIONS MAY BE INCURRED AGAINST ANY ITEM OF APPROPRIATIONS PROVIDED FOR IN SENATE BILL NO. 369 AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO DECEMBER 20, 1955, PROVIDE THAT PAYMENT THEREOF BE MADE IN HARMONY WITH THAT PORTION OF ARTICLE V

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1955

OPINION — AG — SAID CLAUSE NO. 13 DOES NOT AUTHORIZE YOUR BOARD (OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) TO GRANT SAID BOAT CONCESSION TO MR. … , IN WHICH EVENT YOUR BOARD WOULD HAVE SUCH AUTHORITY AND SAID LEASE AGREEMENT WOULD NOT BE VIOLATED.

State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. Johnson

165 Okla. 190 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1933

Louis *192 iana Tax Commission, 158 La. 996 , 105 So. 39 ; State v. Succession of Taylor, 33 La. Ann. 1272 ; State v. Taylor, 34 La. Ann. 978 ; Succession of Townsend, 40 La. Ann. 66 , 3 So. 488 ; Brown v. … Cunningham v. Board of Assessors, 52 La. Ann. 223 , 26 So. 872 .” In State v. Bradford Sav. Bank & Trust Co. (Vt.) 44 Atl. 349 , the court said: «* * * The judgment below was for the defendant to recover its costs.

In Re Monsell

142 Okla. 130 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 14, 1930

This court in Albrecht v. … Albrecht v. Jones, supra.

Kiddie v. Kiddie

563 P.2d 139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1977

Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 202 Okl. 108 , 210 P.2d 666 (1949) held a party appearing in a dentistry licensing hearing is entitled to employ counsel but not to be furnished counsel. Also see Brown v. … Boddie v.

American Casualty Co. v. Board of Education of Independent School District, No. 2

228 F. Supp. 843 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1964

Board, Noftsger-Lawrenee and Associates, a co-partnership, and the W. … United States v. Munsey Trust Co., 332 U.S. 234 , at page 242, 67 S.Ct. 1599 , 91 L.Ed. 2022 . The laborers and materialmen have no rights against the School Board Owner for their unpaid bills.

In re Whiteaker

364 P.2d 1118 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1961

Perry v. Waters, 97 Okl. Cr. 17, 256 P.2d 1119 and Bolton v. McLeod, Okl.Cr., 294 P.2d 586, 589 . … See Application of Brown, Okl.Cr., 297 P.2d 575 , and Application of Degen, Okl. Cr., 359 P.2d 740 .

Herrin v. Arnold

183 Okla. 392 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1938

Justice Brown, who concurred in the result, did not think the act unconstitutional on the ground now being considered. … See Board of Barter Examiners v. Parker (La.) 182 So. 485 .