Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.75s

  • In Re Winston

    917 A.2d 629 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2007

    XI, § 11(d), 2 and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) with directions that it recommend whether identical, greater, or lesser discipline should be imposed as reciprocal discipline, or … In re Brown, 797 A.2d 1232 (D.C.2002); In re Cleary, 777 A.2d 786 (D.C.2001); In re Wechsler, 719 A.2d 100 (D.C.1998).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. National Labor Relations Board

    484 F.3d 601 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 2007

    . § 157. 4 In Eastex, Inc. v. … Tasty Baking Co. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 114, 124 (D.C. Cir. 2001). We afford the Board deference in making this determination “recogniz[ing] the Board’s competence in the first instance to judge the impact of utterances.”

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States v. United States Gypsum Co.

    67 F. Supp. 397 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1946

    In National Labor Relations Board v. … Brown for Certain-teed.

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 (1948)Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    584 F.2d 558 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 25, 1978

    584 F.2d 558 189 U.S.App.D.C. 400 Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board No. 77-1798 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 9/25/78 1 C.A.B. 2 AFFIRMED *

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Greater Peoria Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    543 F.2d 1389 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1976

    543 F.2d 1389 178 U.S.App.D.C. 76 Greater Peoria Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board No. 75-1643 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 11/9/76 1 C.A.B. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • David B. Lilly Co., Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

    495 F.2d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 1974

    Lilly Co., Inc. v. Renegotiation Board 71-1025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 4/16/74 1 D.C.D.C. REMANDED (VACATING 466 F.2d 345 )

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    193 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 23, 1951

    193 F.2d 40 AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATES, Inc., petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, respondent. No. 10914. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Decided November 23, 1951. … Nunneley, Jr., General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, John H. Wanner, Associate General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, and Warren L. Sharfman, Attorney, Civil Aeronautics Board, all of Washington, D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Water Control Board v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

    61 F.R.D. 588 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 1974

    As support for this position, Maryland relies on Illinois v. … In Montgomery Environmental Coalition et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Poel v. General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board

    762 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 24, 1985

    762 F.2d 138 246 U.S.App.D.C. 44 Poel v. General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board 84-1133 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. 4/24/85 1 G.A.O.P.A.B. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paul R. Rosen, Esq. v. National Labor Relations Board

    735 F.2d 564 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1984

    See Ward v. … In Butz v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • D.C. Metropolitan Police Dep't v. D.C. Public Employee Relations Board

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2023

    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BOARD, et al., APPELLEES. … See, e.g., Butler v. Metro. Police Dep’t, 240 A.3d 829, 834-35 (D.C. 2020) (describing three different applications of the statute made by an OEA administrative judge, the OEA Board, and the Superior Court); Metro.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    578 F.2d 442 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 1978

    578 F.2d 442 188 U.S.App.D.C. 200 North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board No. 77-1424 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 6/8/78 1 C.A.B. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    480 F.2d 1195 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 1973

    480 F.2d 1195 156 U.S.App.D.C. 303 Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Civil Aeronautics Board No. 72-1970 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 7/24/73 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • H. Struve Hensel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    321 F.2d 754 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 25, 1963

    The District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board 2 issued a liquor license to RJM, Inc. … Appellants, residents in the area of the restaurant, opposed the issuance of the license before the Board and now ask reversal of the judgment of the District Court refusing to annul the order of the Board granting the license

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sierra Realty Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    82 F.3d 494 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1996

    NLRB v. Burns Int'l Security Servs., Inc., 406 U.S. 272, 294-95 , 92 S.Ct. 1571, 1585-86 , 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972). … The Board did not purport to overrule that decision or to qualify it in any way. Compare Daily News of Los Angeles v. NLRB, 979 F.2d 1571 , 1574-76 (D.C.Cir.1992), with Consolidated Freightways v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. B.V.D. Company, Inc.

    225 F.2d 923 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1955

    This Union filed with the Labor Board against the Company charges of unfair labor practices. The Board in part sustained the charges and in part rejected them. It issued a cease and desist order upon that basis. … , the court shall proceed in the same manner as in the case of an application by the Board under subsection (e) of this section, and shall have the same exclusive jurisdiction to grant to the Board such temporary relief or

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bond v. Friendship Public Charter School Board of Trustees

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2023

    K.M., Plaintiff, v. No. 23-cv-367-ZMF FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al., Defendants. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 80 F. Supp. 3d 90, 98 (D.D.C. 2015) (internal citation omitted). Plaintiff sought relief for FPCS’s failures over the course of five school years.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Plymouth County Retirement Association v. Advisory Board Company

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2019

    See Oran v. … See Kalnit v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Department of Navy

    476 F.3d 936 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 19, 2007

    Before: GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge. 2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Kreis v. Sec’y of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1989)). We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Turner v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Serramonte Oldsmobile, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    86 F.3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 18, 1996

    Bonanno Linen Serv., Inc. v. … Thus, "[t]he Board need only select an appropriate unit, not the most appropriate unit." Cleveland Constr., Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.