Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

1.63s

  • Nevins v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    292 Or. App. 848 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 18, 2018

    In that order, the board, acting under ORS 144.228, 1 deferred petitioner's parole consideration date for a period of 24 months. On review, petitioner contends that, under our decision in Dam v. … board erred in relying on Shellman's evaluation.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Realty Associates v. Women's Club

    230 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1962

    Brown v. Pennsylvania Canal Co., 279 F 417 (3d Cir. 1922) cert d 248 US 558 , 39 S Ct 6 , 63 L ed 420 (see, also, the opinion of the district court in this case, 274 F 467, 469, D. C. E. D. Pa. 1921); Drascovich v. … In Shannon, Auditor, v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Crowfoot Elementary School District No. 89 v. Public Employe Relations Board

    19 Or. App. 638 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1974

    We reject petitioner’s contention and agree with the Board. … In Kankkonen v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Burr

    136 Or. App. 140 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 1995

    State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 276 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). … In State v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Columbia County School District No. 13 v. Columbia County

    66 Or. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1983

    Defendants also rely on Brown v. Portland School District No. 1, 291 Or 77 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981). … Brown did not overrule the express holding of City of Molalla v. Coover, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Silver Wheel Freightlines, Inc.

    57 B.R. 476 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Dec 20, 1985

    Brown, 391 U.S. 471 , 88 S.Ct. 1759 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 (1968). … See Debreceni v. Healthco— D.G. Stoughton Co., 579 F.Supp. 296, 297 (D.Mass.1984). The Board’s argument only begs the question.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Brewster v. Ostrander

    212 Or. 177 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1957

    The two defendants were the only corporators remaining on the board. The other five directors had been elected by the board of directors at various times since 1946 to fill vacancies on the board. Verne L. … Brown v. Bailey, 151 Or 496 , 51 P2d 671 , and the earlier cases cited therein, it is the general rule that the burden of proof in quo warranto actions is on the defendant.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. Sisters School District 6

    353 Or. 189 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 2013

    At issue in this case is whether plaintiff has standing under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.020, to seek a declaration that defendant Sisters School District #6 and its Board of Directors (board) lacked authority … Kubiaczyk, 321 Or 174, 188, 895 P2d 765 (1995) (declaratory relief is available “only when it can affect * * * some rights between the parties”); Brown v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • In Re Gebauer Apartments

    170 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1942

    Great Northern Railway Company v. Weeks , 297 U.S. 135 , 80 L.E. 532 , 56 S.Ct. 426 , and Skouras Theatres Corporation v. … Louis Railway Co. v. Browning , 310 U.S. 362 , 84 L.E. 1254 , 60 S.Ct. 968 , wherein the court observed: ". . . But even assuming that there was an over-assessment, constitutional invalidity would not follow.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Complaint to the Hershberger

    288 Or. 559 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1980

    attorneys to complete the bankruptcy proceeding and that he certify that he has done certain things. 1 The Board of Disciplinary Review concurred in the finding of fact by the Trial Board that the accused was guilty of that … In re Brown, 277 Or 121 , 559 P2d 884 , 277 Or 731 , 561 P2d 1030 (1977).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hardy v. California Trojan Powder Co.

    109 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1923

    BROWN, J. This suit is brought in conformity with the provisions of Section 516, Or. … In Andrus v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Muir v. Morris

    257 F. 150 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 21, 1919

    Muir v. Morris, 80 Or. 378 , 154 Pac. 117 , 157 Pac. 785 . [1] While a judgment of nonsuit in a law action does not bar a subsequent suit or action for the same cause in the state court (Carroll v. … Grande Bonde Electric Co., 49 Or. 477 , 90 Pac. 903 ; Hanna v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cannon v. Hood River Irr. Dist.

    79 Or. 71 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1916

    The law is valid and has been upheld and action thereunder sustained by this court in several cases, namely, Board of Directors v. Peterson, 64 Or. 46 ( 128 Pac. 837 , 129 Pac. 123 ); Payette-Oregon Slope Irr. Dist. v. … The plaintiff fails to allege that he has done this: Brown v. School Dist., 12 Or. 345 ( 7 Pac. 357 ); Goodnough v. Powell, 23 Or. 525 ( 32 Pac. 396 ); Hibernian Ben. Soc. v. Kelly, 28 Or. 173 ( 42 Pac. 3 , 52 Am. St.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pacific Building v. State Tax Commission

    2 Or. Tax 52 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 6, 1965

    VL 64-196, affirming the Marion County Board of Equalization’s finding of the true cash value of plaintiff’s office building in Salem for the tax year 1963-64. … See Brown v. Siemans, 117 Or 583, 590 , 245 P 510 (1926). This court so ruled orally.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Minor v. SAIF Corp. (In re Minor)

    290 Or. App. 537 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 2018

    Board of Parole , 356 Or. 186 , 208, 335 P.3d 828 (2014) ; see Garcia v. … (citing SAIF v. Brown , 177 Or. App. 113 , 120, 33 P.3d 336 (2001) ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Syphers v. Gladden

    230 Or. 148 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1962

    Coffman v. Gladden, 73 Adv Sh 689, 691, 229 Or 99 , 366 P2d 171 (1961); Horace v. Culver, 111 So2d 670 (Fla 1959); Brown v. The People, 8 Ill2d 540, 134 NE2d 760 (1956); People v. … United States, 269 F2d 419 (9th Cir 1959); Brown v. United States, 267 F2d 42 (5th Cir 1959); Bishop v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Beck v. City of Portland

    202 Or. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 2005

    Mark v. … Second, the Supreme Court's analysis of the ripeness question in US West Communications applied the test for ripeness set out in Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or. 446 , 648 P.2d 1289 (1982), and Cummings Constr. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frohnmayer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

    294 Or. 570 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1983

    That claim, SAIF Corporation, et al v. State of Oregon, et al, is now pending in Marion County Circuit Court. … The trial court did not reach this issue because it believed that it had no authority to consider questions of legal ethics under Brown v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Cortez v. State

    121 Or. App. 602 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 14, 1993

    Montgomery Ward v. Bureau of Labor, 42 Or App 159, 163 , 600 P2d 452 , rev den 288 Or 81 (1979); see Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 US 483, 494 , 74 S Ct 686 , 98 L Ed 873 (1954).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Leonard v. Howard

    67 Or. 203 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1913

    Under such circumstances neither law nor equity will help them: Brown v. Levy, 29 Tex. Civ. App. 389 ( 69 S. W. 255 ); Steinmeyer v. Schroeppel, 226 Ill. 9 ( 80 N. E. 564 , 117 Am. St. Rep. 224 , 10 L. R. A. (N. … S.) 114); Crilly v. Board of Education, 54 Ill. App. 371 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.