Case law

Jones v. Jones

57 Okla. 442 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

Ranstead, 22 Ill. 161 ; Davis v. Dresback, 81 Ill. 395 ; Connell v. Galligher, 36 Neb. 749 , 55 N. W. 229 ; Wilson v. Shipman, 34 Neb. 573 , 52 N. W. 576 , 33 Am. St. Rep. 660 ; Murrer v. … Conrath v. Johnston et al., 36 Okla. 425 , 128 Pac. 1088 ; Semple v. Baken, 39 Okla. 563 , 135 Pac. 1141 ; Mullin v. Brown, 40 Okla. 137 , 137 Pac. 107 ; Board of Com’rs Woodward County v.

Shelden v. Shinn

206 Okla. 69 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1952

The *70 claim was for board, room and nursing care of the decedent for the last several years of his life. It was based on an oral contract which was denied by the defendant. … Union Transportation Co. v. Lamb, 190 Okla. 327 , 123 P. 2d 660 ; Magnolia Pet. Co. v. Norton, 189 Okla. 252 , 116 P. 2d 893 . Affirmed. This Court acknowledges the services of Attorneys Kelly Brown, A.

Shakur v. Merit Systems Protection Board

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 30, 2025

Department of the Air Force, he filed an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board. … See Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot.

Sutton v. Kalka

141 Okla. 233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1930

LESTER, V. C. J. O. A. … S.) 384; Davenport v. Lord, 9 Wall. (U. S.) 409; Washington County v. Durant, Id. 415 (U. S.). Text approved Brown v. Gates, 15 W. Va. 131 ; Limestone County v. Rather, 48 Ala. 433 .”

Brown v. Kruger Family Holdings, II, LLC

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 28, 2019

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Oklahoma Co. v.

Oklahoma Ex Rel. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. Greer

204 F. Supp. 2d 1292 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 14, 2002

Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, moves the Court for summary judgment on its claims against the Defendants. The University of Oklahoma is the administrator of a promissory note made by Defendant Marek T. … Oklahoma Student Loan Authority v. Akers, 1995 Ok. Civ.

In Re Assessment of Walters National Bank of Walters

100 Okla. 155 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1924

In the case of Board of Equalization v. … The opinion in the First State Bank Case was handed down March 9, 1920, and has been followed by this court in Brown, Co. Treas., v. Hennessey State Bank, 78 Okla. 141 189 Pac. 355 ; Board of Equalization v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 5, 1989

PERRY V. SINDERMANN, 408 U.S. 593 (1970); AND BOARD OF REGENTS V. ROTH, 408 U.S. 564 (1972). … BROWN V. REARDON, 770 F.2D 896, 904-905 (10TH CIR. 1985). THE U.S.

American Inv. Co. v. Wadlington

122 Okla. 56 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1926

Brown, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 ; Hirsh v. Twyford, 40 Okla. 220 , 139 Pac. 313 ; State ex rel. Mays v. Breckenridge, 43 Okla. 711 , 142 Pac. 407 , and Taylor v. … Substantially the same rule is laid down in Martin v. O’Reilly, 81 Okla. 261 , 200 Pac. 687 , and Yarhola v. Duling, 86 Okla. 171 , 207 Pac. 293 . Under the ru’e laid down in Board of County Commissioners v.

Cook v. Board of Education of Independent School Dist. No. 15 of Atoka County

61 Okla. 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1916

Laughlin v. Thompson, 76 Cal. 287 , 18 Pac. 330 ; Story’s Equity Pleading, 40; Bowen v. Mauzy, 117 Ind. 258 , 19 N. E. 526 ; Kittinger v. Buffalo Traction Co., 160 N. Y. 377 , 54 N. E. 1081 ; State v. … Rep. 41 ; Peake v. Buell, 90 Wis. 508 , 63 N. W. 1058 , 48 Am. St. Rep. 946 ; Starbuck v. Farmers’ Loan Co., 28 App. Div. 308 , 51 N. Y. Supp. 8 .

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LOWERY

2023 OK 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 2023

Bar Ass'n v. Brown , 1989 OK 75 , 773 P.2d 781 , in addition to converting client funds, an attorney was found to be dishonest during a deposition taken for the purpose of investigating the disciplinary matter. … Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Brown Cited 2001 OK 51 , 28 P.3d 551 , 72 OBJ 1921, STATE ex. rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSN. v. PATTERSON Discussed 2003 OK 13 , 71 P.3d 1 , STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v.

YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.

2017 OK 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 2017

City of Midwest City , 2015 OK 51, n. 69, 353 P.3d 532, 547 (justiciability requires the controversy to be ripe for adjudication); Brown v. … Tway, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission , 1995 OK 129, 910 P.2d 972, 978, citing Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. , 1992 OK 72, 833 P.2d 1218, 1226. See , e.g. , Apache Corp. v. State ex rel.

State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. Board of Com'rs of Nowata County

166 Okla. 78 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1933

That conclusion is in direct conflict with the decision of this court in Board of Co. Cam’rs of Woods County v. State ex rel. … Such is the effect of the decisions of this court in Board of Co. Com’rs of Woods County v. State ex rel. Com’rs of the Land Office, supra; State ex rel. Com’rs of Land Office v.

State Ins. Fund v. Bd. Com'rs Creek Cty.

195 Okla. 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1945

See Graves v. Board of County Commissioners of Cimarron County, 170 Okla. 282 , 39 P. 2d 532 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Jenness, 178 Okla. 54 , 61 P. 2d 724 ; Town of Jenks v. Pratt, 137 Okla. 156 , 278 P. 331 . … The last case involving the right to recover under the principle announced in Smartt v. Board of County Commissioners of Craig County, supra, is LeFlore County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry.

Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. Lewis

80 Okla. 187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1921

of Commissioners of Grady County et al. v. … See Loveland v. Tant, 75 Okla. 12 , 181 Pac. 302 ; General Bonding & Casualty Company v. Oklahoma Fire Insurance Company, 75 Okla. 55 , 181 Pac. 303 .”

Harris v. Dungan

199 Okla. 350 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1947

A contingency postponing the effectiveness of parts of an act may not affect effectiveness of other parts. 59 C.J. 1157; County Board of Education v. Durham, 198 Ky. 733 , 249 S.W. 1028 ; 59 C.J. 639; Dowell v. … Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 185 Okla. 342 , 91 P. 2d 771 ; Rush.v. Brown, 187 Okla. 97 , 101 P. 2d 262 ; Johnson v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 211 , 167 P. 2d 891 .

State v. Patton

63 O.B.A.J. 2512 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1992

Quinn v. City of Tulsa, 111 P.2d 1331, 1339 (Okl.1989). … Switzer v. City of Tulsa, 598 P.2d 247, 248 (Okl.Cr.1979).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 21, 1956

MODIFICATION — LEASE — CONTRACT ** OPINION DEALING WITH: MODIFICATION OF ITS LEASE COVERING THE LODGE AND CABINS AND CERTAIN OTHER CONCESSIONS AT SEQUOYAH STATE PARK, AND IN WHICH LETTER NEEDED AN OPINION TO WHAT AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD … (OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) TO ENTER INTO SUCH AN AGREEMENT.

Opinion No. 55-0709

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1955

AG HAS UNDER CONSIDERATION THE PROPOSED CONTRACT BETWEEN THE MARMON ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, A COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION OF HOLLIS, OKLAHOMA AND THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE FIRST FISCAL YEAR MENTIONED IN SAID ACT (SENATE BILL NO. 369 — APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) HAVING EXPIRED. . . … THAT OBLIGATIONS MAY BE INCURRED AGAINST ANY ITEM OF APPROPRIATIONS PROVIDED FOR IN SENATE BILL NO. 369 AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO DECEMBER 20, 1955, PROVIDE THAT PAYMENT THEREOF BE MADE IN HARMONY WITH THAT PORTION OF ARTICLE V