Case law

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

584 F.2d 558 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 25, 1978

584 F.2d 558 189 U.S.App.D.C. 400 Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board No. 77-1798 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 9/25/78 1 C.A.B. 2 AFFIRMED *

Greater Peoria Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board

543 F.2d 1389 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1976

543 F.2d 1389 178 U.S.App.D.C. 76 Greater Peoria Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board No. 75-1643 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 11/9/76 1 C.A.B. AFFIRMED

David B. Lilly Co., Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

495 F.2d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 1974

Lilly Co., Inc. v. Renegotiation Board 71-1025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 4/16/74 1 D.C.D.C. REMANDED (VACATING 466 F.2d 345 )

Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

193 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 23, 1951

193 F.2d 40 AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATES, Inc., petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, respondent. No. 10914. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Decided November 23, 1951. … Nunneley, Jr., General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, John H. Wanner, Associate General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, and Warren L. Sharfman, Attorney, Civil Aeronautics Board, all of Washington, D.

International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board

374 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2005

Board Member’s Inaction on IAM’s Request for Proffer The plaintiff also contends that defendant Board Member Fitzmaurice’s lack of vote on the IAM proffer request “prevents the Board from acting” and is further proof of the … Co. v.

Kaempfer v. Brown (In re B & W Management, Inc.)

71 B.R. 987 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 1987

United States v. DeLuna, 763 F.2d 897 (8th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Thomas v. United States, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 382 , 88 L.Ed.2d 336 (1985); United States v. Nelson, 718 F.2d 315 (9th Cir.1983); United States v. … In United States v.

Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Federal Maritime Board

304 F.2d 938 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1962

The Supreme Court indicated in Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 225 U. … Continental Can Co. v. United States, 272 F.2d 312, 315 (2nd Cir.1959).

D.C. Metropolitan Police Dep't v. D.C. Public Employee Relations Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2023

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BOARD, et al., APPELLEES. … See, e.g., Butler v. Metro. Police Dep’t, 240 A.3d 829, 834-35 (D.C. 2020) (describing three different applications of the statute made by an OEA administrative judge, the OEA Board, and the Superior Court); Metro.

Bio-Medical Applications v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

829 A.2d 208 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 2003

Walsh v. District of Columbia Bd. of Appeals & Review, 826 A.2d 375, 379 (D.C.2003) (quoting Britton v. … Shore, Inc. v.

North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

241 F.2d 445 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 1957

Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served by our reviewing the Board’s finding in regard to “willingness”. Cf. Kuhn v. … North American Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 55 , 237 F.2d 209 , decided September 13, 1956.

Kalorama Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

934 A.2d 393 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2007

We “will defer to the Board’s findings and will not second-guess the Board’s decision unless it is ‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.’ ” Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown v … Brown v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37, 57 (D.C. 1984); cf. Raritan Dev. Corp. v.

White Sulphur Springs Company v. National Labor Relations Board

316 F.2d 410 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 1963

Holmes Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 179 F.2d 876, 879 (5 Cir., 1950). … B. v. Winchester Electronics, Incorporated, 2 Cir., 295 F.2d 288, 292 (1961); National Labor Relations Board v. L. Ronney & Sons Furniture Mfg.

Paul R. Rosen, Esq. v. National Labor Relations Board

735 F.2d 564 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1984

See Ward v. … In Butz v.

North America Freight Car Ass'n v. Surface Transportation Board

529 F.3d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 2008

We defer to the Board’s interpretation as consistent with the statutory language. See W. Coal Traffic League v. … Gulf R.R. v.

Sierra Realty Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

82 F.3d 494 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1996

NLRB v. Burns Int'l Security Servs., Inc., 406 U.S. 272, 294-95 , 92 S.Ct. 1571, 1585-86 , 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972). … The Board did not purport to overrule that decision or to qualify it in any way. Compare Daily News of Los Angeles v. NLRB, 979 F.2d 1571 , 1574-76 (D.C.Cir.1992), with Consolidated Freightways v.

Hilton Hotels Corp. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

435 A.2d 1062 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1981

Hilton Hotels Corporation v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 363 A.2d 670, 671 (1976) (Hilton I). … Goto v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 423 A.2d 917 , 925 n.15 (1980), citing Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 383 A.2d 7 (1978); District of Columbia v.

Libertarian Party v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

768 F. Supp. 2d 174 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2011

See Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 737 n. 8, 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974) (collecting cases). … Timmons v.

District of Columbia v. Tyrrell

41 App. D.C. 463 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1914

Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App. D. C. 273, 282, 25 L.R.A.(N.S.) 98. … Maximilian v. New York, 62 N. Y. 160, 164 , 20 Am. Rep. 468 ; Brown v. District of Columbia, supra."

Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

162 F.3d 101 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1998

Workers v. ICC, 862 F.2d 330 (D.C.Cir.1988)). Subject to these conditions, the Board approved Wisconsin Central’s acquisition of Union Pacific’s rail lines. … Taking up each argument in turn, we review the Board’s interpretation of the ICC Termination Act under Chevron’s two-step analysis. See Chevron U.S.A. v.

Freund Baking Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

165 F.3d 928 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1999

Eastex, Inc. v. … See Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB,  461 U.S. 731, 741 (1983). In support of this argument, the Board points to NAACP v.