Case law

State Ex Rel. Gaines v. Canada

344 Mo. 1238 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 1, 1939

The Schooner Peggy, 1 Cranch, 103 , and quoted approvingly in Simpson v. Stoddard County, 173 Mo. *1244 421, 73 S. … '[See, also, Totten v. James, 55 Mo. 494 ; Hubbard v. Gilpin, 57 Mo. 441 ; Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U. S. 443 ; Texas Co. v. Brown, 258 U. S. 466 ; McCann v. Retirement Board, 331 Ill. 193 , 162 N.

State ex rel. Lehmann v. Fox C-6 Sch. Dist.

565 S.W.3d 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2018

Marler v. State Board of Optometry , 898 S.W.2d 559 (Mo. App. … In Brown v. Weir , 675 S.W.2d 135 , 142 (Mo. App. E.D. 1984), this Court found that Chapter 536 applies to the decision of a board of education to dismiss a teacher.

Abernathy v. City of St. Louis

313 S.W.2d 717 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1958

on recommendation of certain boards created by the Charter. … State v. Wilson, 1915, 265 Mo. 1 , 175 S.W. 603 ; Brown v. Morris, 1956, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 166 [160], loc. cit. 167.” We have no quarrel to find with that rule.

Swanger v. National Juvenile Law Center

714 S.W.2d 170 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 1986

Heitman v. Brown Group, Inc., 638 S.W.2d 316, 318 (Mo.App.1982). … Willman v. St. Joseph Hospital, 684 S.W.2d 408, 410 (Mo.App.1984) (assuming but not holding that bylaws are a contract); Arie v.

Thelma D. v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS

737 F. Supp. 541 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 21, 1990

As a local governmental entity, the Board may be found liable under § 1983 where an official custom or policy of the Board causes an individual to suffer a constitutional violation. Monell v. … Patzner v. Burkett, 779 F.2d 1363 , 1367 n. 4 (8th Cir.1985). For all the above reasons, the Court grants the Board's motion for summary judgment.

Mauer v. Board of Trustees of the Missouri State Employees' Retirement System

762 S.W.2d 517 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1988

Lawrence v. … See Howard v. McNeill, 716 S.W.2d 912, 915 (Mo.App.1986); Bradley v. McNeill, 709 S.W.2d 153, 156 (Mo.App.1986); Nicolai v.

Lohmeyer v. State Bd. of Nursing

579 S.W.3d 229 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2019

Lauren Lohmeyer ("Appellant") appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decisions of the Administrative Hearing Commission ("the Commission") and the Missouri Board of Nursing ("the Board"), which found cause … Upon consideration of the whole record, we no error in the decisions of the Commission and the Board and affirm. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose.

Stroup v. Rauschelbach

217 Mo. App. 236 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 5, 1924

C., 72 Mo. 129 ; Burke v. Smith, 37 N. W. 830 ; Flaherty v. Moran, 45 N. W. 381 ; Kirkwood v. Finnegan, 55 N. W. 457 . … [Mahan v. Brown, 13 Wend. 261 .]

Kyle v. Hoyle

6 Mo. 526 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1840

Brown at the witness’s house when she arrived; Hoyle boarded at another place; he thought there was great friendship betwixt the plaintiff and defendant. … Brown states that on the 23d of June she went to Kyle’s to board; on the next day Hoyle came there and told her what a trick Kyle had played on him, and that he had deceived him by false statements; that shortly after Kyle

Missouri Title Loans, Inc. v. City of St. Louis Board of Adjustment

62 S.W.3d 408 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 1, 2001

On appeal of the trial court’s decision on a petition to review the decision of the Board, we review the decision of the Board, not the judgment of the trial court. State ex rel Teefey v. … Alumax Foils, *415 Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 959 S.W.2d 886 , 888 (Mo.App. E.D.1997).

First Assembly Church of West Plains v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.

872 S.W.2d 577 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1994

See Brown v. St. … See Taylor v. F.W. Woolworth, 641 S.W.2d 108, 110 [1] (Mo. banc 1982); Stith v. St.

Deppe v. Board of Jury Supervisors of St. Louis County, Mo.

351 F. Supp. 965 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 29, 1972

This reference was a statement in Brown v. … Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 310 [, 25 L.Ed. 664 ]." This quotation from Brown v. Allen, supra, was dictum in that case and the quotation contained therein was dictum in the case of Strauder v.

Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Fritz

40 Mo. 372 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

The evidence adduced by the appellant was substantially the same as in the case of the same plaintiff v. Risley’s Heirs, decided at this term (ante p. 356). … The other questions arising on the record have been already discussed and decided at this term in the case of the Schools v. Eisley, which must also determine this. Judgment affirmed. The other judges concur.

Kish v. Chilhowee R-IV School District

814 S.W.2d 649 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1991

Louis, 711 S.W.2d 950, 957 (Mo.App.1986) (tenured teacher serving as principal); Brown v. Weir, 675 S.W.2d 135, 142 (Mo.App.1984) (tenured teacher). … See, e.g., Brown, 675 S.W.2d at 142 .

Westside Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Dexter

559 S.W.2d 638 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1977

Brown, 354 Mo. 700, 709 , 190 S.W.2d 900, 906 [12] (1945); 82 Am.Jur.2d, Zoning and Planning, § 333, at p. 904], well reasoned cases in other jurisdictions do not except challenges to validity from the exhaustion requirement … Lieux v.

State ex rel. King v. Board of Trustees of the Fireman's Pension Fund

192 Mo. App. 583 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1916

[State ex rel. v. Board of Trustees Policemen’s Pension Fund, 121 Wis. 44 .] … [Pennie v. Reis, 132 U. S. 464 .]

Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co.

768 S.W.2d 81 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1986

The Board of Zoning Adjustment has no legislative power and cannot by its order amend or repeal any zoning ordinance, rule or regulation. Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 851 (Mo.App.1964). … Deal & Co. v. Kuhlmann, 244 S.W.2d 390 , 393 (Mo.App.1951).

Brown v. Butler County Sheriff's Department

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 31, 2024

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … See State v. Brown, No. 23BT-CR00079- 01 (36th Jud. Cir., Butler County Court).

Housing Authority of St. Charles v. Board of Adjustment of St. Charles

941 S.W.2d 725 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1997

This evidence was probative and could be considered by the Board. See Smith v. Morton, 890 S.W.2d 403, 406 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). This contention is denied. III. … Id.; see also Karelitz v. Soraghan, 851 S.W.2d 85, 90 (Mo.App. E.D.1993).

Gilleo v. City of Ladue

774 F. Supp. 1559 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 7, 1991

Defendants cite Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 470-71 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2295-96 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); Rowan v. United States Post Office Department, 397 U.S. 728 , 90 S.Ct. 1484 , 25 L.Ed.2d 736 (1970); Kovacs v. … Unlike the present case, Kovacs v. Cooper , Carey v. Brown , and Pursley v. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas , all involve regulation of public fora.