Case law

Mausoleum Builders v. State Board of Taxes

88 N.J.L. 592 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 3, 1916

The county board of taxation canceled the assessment on real estate and confirmed the assessment on the building. The state board of equalization of taxes affirmed the judgment of the county board of taxation. … Elizabeth v. Cory, 73 N. J. L. 706; Cooper Hospital v. City of Camden, 70 Id. 478.

Newark Aqueduct Board v. City of Passaic

45 N.J. Eq. 393 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1889

See, also, State v. Bentley, 3 Zab. 532; Proprietors of Bridges v. Hoboken Land and Improvement Co., 2 Beas. 81; Jersey City v. Hudson City, 2 Beas. 420; Townsend v. Brown, 4 Zab. 80; Morris Canal and Banking Co. v. … In the case of the Attorney-General v. Cockermouth Local Board, L. R. (18 Eq.) 172, in 1874, I find that Sir George Jessel, M. E., dealt with testimony by Dr.

La Fronz v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION

164 N.J. Super. 5 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1978

Super. 5 (1978) 395 A.2d 538 THOMAS LA FRONZ AND WEEHAWKEN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Crifasi v. Oakland Governing Body, 156 N.J. Super. 182 (App. Div. 1978).

Gross v. Essex County Board of Elections

120 N.J.L. 71 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 6, 1938

Relator seeks a mandamus to compel the board of elections of Essex county to certify to the Essex County Board of Chosen Freeholders that the relator is entitled to the sum of $17 for services rendered in an Essex county … Harrington’s Sons v. Jersey City, 78 N. J. L. 610. See, also, Vanderveer v. Herbert, 76 Id. 173. Prosecutor is entitled to a peremptory writ of mandamus.

Omnipoint Communication, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

337 N.J. Super. 398 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 23, 2001

The Board also concludes that in deciding the instant case, that it should consider the provisions of Smart SMR v. … See also Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Twp. of Wall, 127 N.J. 152, 160-61, 163 , 603 A. 2d 30 (1992).

Suruda v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION

167 N.J. Super. 331 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1979

Super. 331 (1979) 400 A.2d 860 WILLIAM SURUDA, BEATRICE BAILEY AND DOMINICK PUGLIESE, PLAINTIFFS, v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided March 9, 1979. *332 Mr. … It is established that legal fees in connection with the defense of a challenge to board membership are within the *334 ambit of N.J.S.A. 18A:12-20. Jones v. Kolbeck, 119 N.J. Super. 299 (App.

Board of Tenement House Supervision v. Schlechter

83 N.J.L. 88 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1912

Inasmuch as this appeal is‘classified as litigated common business, being in the nature of a certiorari (Green v. … The action being for a penalty, plaintiff must •show a case strictly within the statute. 30 Cyc. 1358; Allaire v. Howell Works Co., 2 Gr. 21.

Wogish v. Board of Health, C., Moonachie

114 N.J.L. 261 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1935

"The board of health under a supplement to its sanitary code took jurisdiction over the matter. The board of health instituted five proceedings against the prosecutor for violations of the sanitary code. … "Local boards of health have power to regulate the keeping of pigs. Section 12, Board of Health act. 2 Comp. Stat., p. 2663.

Lehrer v. Board of Adjustment of Newark

137 N.J.L. 100 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1948

Schnell v. Township Committee of Ocean, 120 N. J. L. 194, 197. There is no question of the validity of the ordinance. Schnell v. Township Committee of Ocean, supra. … First *102 Church, &c., v. Board of Adjustment, &c., Newark, 128 N. J. L. 376.

Fox v. Board of Education of Newark

129 N.J.L. 349 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1943

Fox, the Board relies upon the cases of Skladzien v. Board of Education of Bayonne, 12 N. J. Mis. R. 602; affirmed, 115 N. J. L. 203, and Evans v. Board of Education of Gloucester City, 13 N. J. Mis. … Reilly v. Board of Education of Camden, 127 N. J. L. 490.

Bound Brook Board of Education v. Glenn Ciripompa

442 N.J. Super. 515 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 2015

A-2198-14T1 BOUND BROOK BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, October 29, 2015 v. … board.

Coar v. New Jersey State Parole Board

957 N.J. 461 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 9, 2008

957 A.2d 1172 (2008) 957 N.J. 461 COAR v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD. C-77 September Term 2008 62,802 Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 9, 2008. Petition for certification. Denied.

Kirschling v. Atlantic City Board of Education

10 F. Supp. 3d 587 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 31, 2014

Erickson v. … See also Bergen Commercial Bank v.

C.N. v. Ridgewood Board of Education

146 F. Supp. 2d 528 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 15, 2001

As defendants argue, plaintiffs cannot maintain a § 1983 action against the Ridgewood Board of Education because the allegations lodged against the Board are not a reflection of Board policy, but rather a violation of Board … See also Weixel, 2000 WL 1100395 at *7; Schuler v. Board of Educ., 2000 WL 134346 , at *9-10 (E.D.N.Y. Feb.1, 2000); Jensen v.

Ettrick v. State Board of Tax Appeals

12 N.J. Misc. 432 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1934

In the case of Stryker v. Vanderbilt, 27 N. J. … In Feuchtwanger v. McCool et al., 29 N. J.

Hall v. TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN PLANNING BOARD

200 N.J. 206 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 2009

976 A.2d 386 (2009) 200 N.J. 206 HALL v. TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN PLANNING BOARD. Nos. C-1197 September Term 2008, 64,331 Supreme Court of New Jersey. July 20, 2009. Petition for certification. Denied.

SAUNDERS v. NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 16, 2023

Pa. 2013) (noting that although this standard typically applies to municipal entities, it “applies with equal force to supervisory liability claims premised on a ‘policy, practice, or custom’ theory” (citing Brown v. … Hoag v. Brown, 935 A.2d 1218, 1230 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2007). Consequently, Count II is dismissed as to the NJDOC.

Vedutis v. South Plainfield Board of Education

142 N.J. Super. 492 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1976

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Demos, which was approved in Rost v. Fair Lawn Bd. of Ed., 137 N. J. Super. 76 (App. Div. 1975).

Ml, Inc. v. Edison Township Board of Education

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 2025

A-0179-25 16 See D'Agostino v. Maldonado, 216 N.J. 168, 182-83 (2013) (citing Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp. … The Board therefore did not act arbitrarily or unreasonably given the sequence of events and circumstances.5 V.

Nudge v. New Jersey State Parole Board

199 N.J. 537 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 2009