Case law

City of Oklahoma City v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 157

254 P.3d 678 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 2011

Brown v. Marker, 1965 OK 172, 119 , 410 P.2d 61, 66 ; State ex rel. Murphy v. Boudreau, 1982 OK 117, ¶ 12 , 653 P.2d 531, 533 . … City of Hugo v. State ex rel. Public Employees Relations Bd., 1994 OK 134, ¶ 15 , 886 P.2d 485, 492 . That reasoning applies to an interest arbitration board as well.

Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Washita County

38 Okla. 436 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1913

In Polk v. Minnehaha County, 5 Dak. 120 , 37 N. … Hinds v. Marmolejo, 60 Cal. 229, 231 ; Daggs v. Phoenix Nat. Bank, 5 Ariz. 409 , 53 Pac. 201, 204 ; Wolverton v. Exchange Nat. Bank, 11 Wash. 94 , 39 Pac. 247 . In Guild v. First Nat. Bank, 4 S. D. 566, 57 N.

Childs v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

70 O.B.A.J. 2233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1999

(the Board). … Bowlin v. Alley, 1989 OK 66 , 773 P.2d 365, 368 (citing Tigner v. Texas, 310 U.S. 141, 147 , 60 S.Ct. 879, 882 , 84 L.Ed. 1124, 1128 (1940)); Brown v. Lillard, 1991 OK 74 , 814 P.2d 1040, 1041 (citing Kirk v. Bd.

State Ex Rel. Settles v. Board of Education of Dependent School District No. D-38

389 P.2d 356 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1964

Co. of Cincinnati, Ohio v. State Ins. Board, 184 Okl. 66 , 84 P.2d 614 ), justice will not permit us to ignore such interpretations to the detriment of those who may have relied thereon. … Board of Education of City of Guthrie v. Excise Board, 86 Okl. 24 , 206 P. 517 . In the sixth paragraph of the syllabus in State ex rel. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. v.

Burba v. State Industrial Commission

195 Okla. 344 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1944

Hollis v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp., 174 Okla. 544 , 51 P. 2d 498 ; Cook v. State Industrial Commission, 186 Okla. 157 , 96 P. 2d 1038 ; Brown v. … Board of County Commissioners, 188 Okla. 52 , 105 P. 2d 1068 ; and Zimmerman v. Sanders Const. Co., 188 Okla. 361 , 109 P. 2d 486 .

Spartan Aircraft Company v. Merchant

274 P.2d 1018 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1954

LeFlore-Poteau Coal Co. v. Thurston, 184 Okl. 178 , 86 P.2d 284 ; Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. Stevens, 194 Okl. 109 , 148 P.2d 176 ; Gentry v. State Industrial Commission, 202 Okl. 75 , 210 P.2d 160 ; M. & W. … Mining Co. v. Lee, 199 Okl. 76 , 182 P.2d 759 ; Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Washington, 180 Okl. 381 , 70 P.2d 69 . Award sustained. JOHNSON, V. C. J„ and WELCH, CORN, ARNOLD, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.

Bare v. Patterson

200 Okla. 420 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1948

It must be, and is, conceded that ordinarily mandamus will not lie to correct errors of judgment by a board in matters over which the board has jurisdiction. … If the filing was contrary to law by reason of the failure to support the notification and declaration by the required affidavits, accepted for filing by the secretary of the board, then the action of the board must not be

Carter v. Sapulpa & I. Ry. Co.

49 Okla. 471 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1915

In Walker et al. v. Brown, Adm’x, 165 U. S. 654 , 17 Sup. Ct. 453, 41 L. Ed. 865 , Mr. … In Ketchum et al. v. St. Louis, 101 U. S. 306 , 25 L.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LOWERY

2023 OK 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 2023

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Bar Ass'n v. Brown , , 773 P.2d 781 , in addition to converting client funds, an attorney was found to be dishonest during a deposition taken for the purpose of investigating the disciplinary matter.

Fortune v. Board of Com'rs of Osage County

149 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1931

No. 65, Payne County, v. Board of County Com’rs of Payne County, 148 Okla. 5 , 296 Pac. 483 . The facts in that case, however, are radically different from the facts disclosed here. … The matter of certiorari, and what should be done under it, has been several times before this court, and we think the syllabus in the case of Argabright v.

Ex Parte Woodruff

90 Okla. Crim. 59 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1949

See, also, Rush v. Brown, 187 Okla. 97 , 101 P. 2d 262 ; Bailey v. State Board of Public Affairs et al., 194 Okla. 495 , 153 P. 2d 235 ; and Gibbons v. Missouri K. & T. R. Co. et al., 142 Okla. 146 , 285 P. 1040 . … W. 891 , and particularly in a late Ohio case involving the public health, and being Weber v. Board of Health, Butler County, et al., 1947, 148 Ohio St. 389 , 74 N.

Brown v. Elephant Talk North America Corporation

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 13, 2022

Oklahoma Bar Association v. … Bar Ass’n v. Weeks, 969 P.2d 347, 354 (Okla. 1998) (citing Venegas v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Nessmith

435 P.2d 602 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1967

Board of Police and Fire Pension Com’rs., 101 Cal.App.2d 248 , 225 P.2d 617 , and Scarano v. Central R. … Brown, Okl., 410 P.2d 52 , *607 Loomis v. Church, 76 Idaho 87 , 277 P.2d 561 , and Garbe v. Halloran, 150 Ohio St 476, 83 N.E.2d 217 , all cited by defendant, and Barnes v.

Hickman v. Board of Com'rs of Pottawatomie County

169 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1934

In the syllabus to Hawks et al. v. … Wentz et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County, Okla., 147 Okla. 173 , 295 P. 599 ; Wentz et al. v. Ingenthron et al., 146 Okla. 165 , 294 P. 154 ; Wentz et al. v. Dawson, 149 Okla. 94 , 299 P. 493 .

Block v. Pearson

19 Okla. 422 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

Leitz et al. v. U. P. Ry. Co., 16 Kan. 133 ; Hathaway et al. v. Davis et al., 32 Kan. 693 , 5 Pac. 29 ; Chicago Lumber Co. v. Osborn et al., 40 Kan. 168 , 19 Pac. 656 ; Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. … Brown *428 et al., 46 Kan. 543 , 26 Pac. 1019 ; Chicago Lumber Co. v. Fretz et al., 51 Kan. 134 , 32 Pac. 908 ; Mulvane v. Chicago Lumber Co., 56 Kan. 675 , 44 Pac. 613 .

Board of Com'rs of Stephens County v. Graham

190 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1941

Board of Com’rs of Rogers County v. Baxter, 113 Okla. 280 , 241 P. 752 ; see, also, Morse v. Board of Com’rs of Marshall County, 169 Okla. 600 , 38 P. 2d 945 . … Board of Com’rs of Garfield County v. Anderson, 167 Okla. 253 , 29 P. 2d 75 .

Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tractor & Equipment Co.

183 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1938

Board of County Com’rs of Le Flore County v. Central Nat. Bank of Potean, 177 Okla. 11 , 57 P.2d 257 ; Excise Board of Creek County v. Gulf Pipe Line Co., 156 Okla. 103 , 9 P.2d 460 . … County v.

Opinion No. 70-254 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 28, 1970

The rule of statutory construction related to your question is stated in Brown v. … State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 (1962), follows: "Public officers have only such authority as is conferred upon them by law, and such authority must be exercised in the manner prescribed by law."

Knight-Brown v. United States of America

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Feb 17, 2022

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) MIRANDA KNIGHT-BROWN, and ) (2) JUSTIN … Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Predator Int’l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180–81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007).

Clark v. Board of County Commissioners

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2025

Brown v. City of Tulsa, 124 F.4th 1251, 1263 (10th Cir. 2025). … See Pack v. Jim, No. 24-CV- 42-JDR-JFJ, 2025 WL 2214564, at *6 (N.D. Okla. July 1, 2025) (finding a municipal liability claim was more appropriately asserted against the sheriff than the board of county 6 Ms.