Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

2.18s

  • State ex rel. Norwood v. Sheffield

    380 S.W.3d 666 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 2012

    Valentine v. Orr, 366 S.W.3d 534, 541 (Mo. banc 2012). Further, the Board of Probation and Parole’s report of April 23, 2012, clearly recommends that relator be released on probation. … Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Flowers v. Morehead

    256 Mo. 683 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1914

    S. v. Maurice (2 Brock), 96 Fed. Cas. No. 15747; State ex rel. v. Shannon, 133 Mo. 139, 164 .] In State ex rel. v. … [State v. Boyd, 196 Mo. l. c. 59, 66; State ex rel. v. Sheppard, 192 Mo. 497, 506 ; Manker v. Faulhaber, 94 Mo. 430, 438 .]

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • City of Springfield ex rel. Board of Public Utilities v. Brechbuhler

    895 S.W.2d 583 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1995

    In Missouri Cities Water Co. v. … Id. at 821 (quoting Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Newingham, 386 S.W.2d 663, 665 (Mo.App.1965)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Saint Louis Charter School v. State Board of Education

    376 S.W.3d 712 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2012

    See Huff v. Dewey & LeBoeuf, LLP, 340 S.W.3d 623, 627 (Mo.App.2011). A final judgment must dispose of all parties and all issues in the case and leave nothing for future determination. Goodson v. … City of Valley Park v. Armstrong, 273 S.W.3d 504, 508 (Mo. banc 2009).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Gehner

    325 Mo. 24 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1930

    Teare v. Dungan, 265 Mo. 353 , l. c. 365, 177 S. W. 604 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Wilson, 216 Mo. 215 , l. c. 287, 115 S. W. 549 .] … Brown v. Wilson, supra.] Respondents cite State ex rel. v. Timbrook, supra.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. S. S. Kresge Co.

    59 F. Supp. 427 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 3, 1945

    Whether, in obtaining empty cardboard containers, the defendant evaded or avoided the rules of the War Production Board is not a question for consideration here. … It was so held in United States v. Armour & Co. of Delaware, D. C., 50 F.Supp. 347 , in Brown, Administrator, v. Banana Distributors of Connecticut, Inc., et al., D.C., 52 F.Supp. 804 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Massage Therapy Training Institute, LLC v. Missouri State Board of Therapeutic Massage

    65 S.W.3d 601 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 2002

    Ass’n v. … State v. Rousseau, 34 S.W.3d 254, 261 [11] (Mo.App.2000).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Buescher Memorial Home, Inc. v. Missouri State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

    413 S.W.3d 338 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 2013

    AHC’s findings and conclusions and the Board’s discipline as one decision. 4 Albanna v. … Praxair, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Liddell v. Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis, Mo.

    654 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 30, 1987

    654 F.Supp. 334 (1987) Craton LIDDELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO., et al., Defendants. No. 72-1100C(5). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. … Louis (hereinafter "City Board") and the Board of Education of the Special School District of St.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Walker Reorganized School District R-4 v. Flint

    303 S.W.2d 200 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 6, 1957

    Brown and Mr. Smith did present to him a petition wanting him to call a board meeting and he agreed to if he could get the board members together. This petition asked for the annexation. … Ray Eddy, president of the Board of Directors of the Coal Creek District, was to the effect that on the afternoon of April 17th, “around twelve o’clock”, Mr. Brown and Mr.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Lehmann v. Fox C-6 Sch. Dist.

    565 S.W.3d 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2018

    Marler v. State Board of Optometry , 898 S.W.2d 559 (Mo. App. … In Brown v. Weir , 675 S.W.2d 135 , 142 (Mo. App. E.D. 1984), this Court found that Chapter 536 applies to the decision of a board of education to dismiss a teacher.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Holly Inv. Co. v. BOARD OF ZONING ADJ. OF KANSAS CITY

    771 S.W.2d 949 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1989

    This court may not substitute its judgment for that of the Board if the Board’s decision meets those criteria. Volkman v. City of Kirkwood, 624 S.W.2d 58, 59 (Mo.App.1981). … Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 852 (Mo.App.1964). See also § 89.090.1(3), RSMo 1980.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.

    287 S.W.3d 687 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 2009

    Pamela Brown was a passenger in Mr. Jones’ vehicle at the time of the accident. The parties stipulate that Mr. Jones and Ms. Brown each suffered in excess of $150,000 in total damages as a result of the accident. Ms. … Co. v.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Noland Road Raceways, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

    145 S.W.3d 455 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 2004

    The court affirmed the Board of Zoning Adjustment (“BZA”) of Kansas City’s denial of Appellant’s proposed amendment to its conditional use permit. … Windy Point Partners, LLC v. Boone County, 100 S.W.3d 821, 824 (Mo.App.2003).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Abernathy v. City of St. Louis

    313 S.W.2d 717 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1958

    on recommendation of certain boards created by the Charter. … State v. Wilson, 1915, 265 Mo. 1 , 175 S.W. 603 ; Brown v. Morris, 1956, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 166 [160], loc. cit. 167.” We have no quarrel to find with that rule.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of Laddonia v. Poor

    73 Mo. App. 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1898

    Corp. [4 Ed.], sec. 322; Kansas City v. Sutton, 52 Mo. App. 398 ; Chillicothe v. Brown, 38 Mo. App. 609 ; St. Louis v. Spiegel, 8 Mo. App. 478 . … In the case of Chillicothe v. Brown, supra, the Kansas City court of appeals had under consideration a similar ordinance, which the court sustained.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jefferson Bank v. Merchants Refrigrating Co.

    236 Mo. 407 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 8, 1911

    [Williams v. Chariton County, 85 Mo. 645 ; State ex rel. v. Wofford, 116 Mo. 220 ; State ex rel. v. Brown, 146 Mo. 401 .] … Plaintiff had the right to read said deposition.. *415 [McClintock v. Curd, 32 Mo. 411 ; Watson v. Race, 46 Mo. App. 546 .]

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Group Health Plan, Inc. v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts

    787 S.W.2d 745 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 1990

    Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Hartenbach et al., 768 S.W.2d 657 (Mo.App.1989); Schierding v. Missouri Dental Board, 705 S.W.2d 484 (Mo.App.1985); and State ex rel. … State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bird v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Professional Land Surveyors & Landscape Architects

    259 S.W.3d 516 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 26, 2008

    v. … Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, 744 S.W.2d 524, 535-536 (Mo.App.1988).

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • In Re Village of Lone Jack

    419 S.W.2d 87 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1967

    RAGSDALE et al., Respondents, v. Charles E. CURRY et al., Respondents, Richard V. Brown et al., Appellants. No. 52707. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. September 11, 1967. … Brown, et al., members of its first board of trustees. T. E.

    Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.