Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

4.71s

  • LIVENGOOD v. BROWN

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 17, 2022

    v. … But the Complaint fails to state a claim against Defendant NCDPS because Defendant NCDPS, as a state agency, constitutes “an arm of the state,” Hanifee v. Board of Educ. of Kent Cnty., Civ.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sarda v. City/County of Durham Board of Adjustment

    156 N.C. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2003

    Stat. § 160A-388(e), and they have no standing. *215 Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C. App. 612, 614 , 300 S.E.2d 869, 870 (1983). … State v. Linemann, 135 N.C. App. 734, 739 , 522 S.E.2d 781, 785 (1999) (citing Burgess v. Gibbs, 262 N.C. 462, 465 , 137 S.E.2d 806, 808 (1964)).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Newton v. New Hanover County Board of Education

    114 N.C. App. 719 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 17, 1994

    Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576 , 201 S.E.2d 897 (1974). … Daughtry v. Turnage, 295 N.C. 543 , 246 S.E.2d 788 (1978).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brannon v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

    331 N.C. 335 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1992

    Cloud v. Wilson, 72 N.C. 155 (1875). … Sneed v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harris v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY

    274 N.C. 343 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1968

    Harris, Elizabeth Harris, and Harlin Patrick v. The BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY and the Individual Members Thereof, Namely, W. R. Owens, R. B. Brown, H. W. Pritchett, J. C. Hassell, W. W. … The second sentence in Article IX, Sec. 2, enclosed by parentheses, following the decision in Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners v. Sutton

    120 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1897

    The Acts of 1889, Ch. 199, substituted the County Board of Education as re-lators (Board of Education v. Wall, 117 N. … C., 382 ), but Acts of 1895, Ch. 439, abolished the County Board of Education and again made the county commissioners the proper relators. Tillery v. Candler, 118 N. C., 888 . No Error.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Thomas

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 31, 2022

    THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 5:22-cv-00028-MR DASHAWN TYREK BROWN … See Jackson v. Sampson, 536 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. Green

    266 N.C. App. 382 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 2019

    COA18-1114 Filed: 16 July 2019 Craven County, Nos. 16 CRS 53678, 17 CRS 448, 17 CRS 449 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES BROWN GREEN, JR. … Brown, for the State. Winifred H. Dillon, Attorney at Law, for defendant-appellant. HAMPSON, Judge. Factual and Procedural Background James Brown Green, Jr.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. KIJAKAZI

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 21, 2022

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CINDY LOU BROWN, ) … (citing Bird v. Commissioner of Soc. Sec. Admin., 699 F.3d 337, 340-41 (4th Cir. 2012), and Booker v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Doe on Demise of Te-Gan-Tossee v. Rogers & Brown

    9 N.C. 567 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1823

    Wilson read an affidavit stating, that at Buncombe Superior Court, Spring term 1833, an action of eject-meat was tried between an Indian, named Te-gan-tos-see, ami Rogers & Brown, that there was a verdict and judgment for

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Kannapolis City Schools Board of Education

    55 F. Supp. 3d 821 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 23, 2014

    Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc., 361 U.S. 388, 392 , 80 S.Ct. 453 , 4 L.Ed.2d 393 (1960); see also Purdham v. Fairfax Cnty. Sch. … Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jones v. . the Board of Commissioners of Bladen Co.

    73 N.C. 182 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875

    A demand of payment made upon the Board would be no demand at all, for the Board has power only to audit and allow or disallow. … As was said in Love v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Merrill v. Winston-Salem Forsyth County Board of Education

    369 N.C. 487 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hernandez

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 26, 2021

    THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 5:21-cv-00024-MR MARCUS RANDALL BROWN … P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.”); Link v. Wabash R.R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tobe-Williams v. New Hanover County Board of Education

    234 N.C. App. 453 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2014

    In Taylor v. … See Taborn v. Hammonds, 83 N.C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. WALMART

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 1, 2022

    Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 545 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). … Brown, 716 F.3d 342, 350 (4th Cir. 2013), and a court “need not accept as true unwarranted inferences, unreasonable conclusions, or arguments,” Vitol, 708 F.3d at 548 (quoting Jordan v. Alt. Res.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Herring v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education

    137 N.C. App. 680 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2000

    Rowan County Board of Education v. … In Vester v. Nash/Rocky Mount Board of Education, 124 N.C.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hernandez

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 7, 2021

    Preiser v. … See generally Zombro v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • FANTASY WORLD, INC. v. GREENSBORO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

    358 N.C. 543 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 24, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Burns

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 7, 2021

    Republican Party of N.C. v. Martin, 980 F.2d 943, 952 (4th Cir. 1992). … v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). Thus, a complaint will survive if it contains “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Ashcroft v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.