Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

7.27s

  • Georgetown Residents Alliance v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    816 A.2d 41 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 2003

    See Levy v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 570 A.2d 739, 748-749 (D.C.1990). … See Lange v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 407 A.2d 1058, 1061 (D.C.1979). 12 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

    723 F.2d 963 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 1983

    See, e.g., Windward Shipping, Ltd. v. American Radio Association, 415 U.S. 104 , 94 S.Ct. 959 , 39 L.Ed.2d 195 (1974); Incres Steamship Co. v. … ILA v. Allied International, Inc., 456 U.S. at 224-26 , 102 S.Ct. at 1663-64 (no exemption for “political” secondary boycott); see also Jacksonville Bulk Terminals v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    605 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2015

    The Board’s findings of section 8(a)(1) violations were supported by substantial evidence in the record, see United Mine Workers of Am., Dist. 31 v. … With respect to the séetion 8(a)(3) violations, the Board properly found, under its Wright Line test, see NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Phoenix Transit System v. National Labor Relations Board

    63 F. App'x 524 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 2003

    The Board has “considerable discretion in deciding whether to defer to an arbitration decision,” but must follow the standards of deference found in its own case law, American Freight Sys., Inc. v. … Austin, 418 U.S. 264 , 94 S.Ct. 2770 , 41 L.Ed.2d 745 (1974); Linn v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Grand Fountain of the United order of True Reformers

    28 App. D.C. 200 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1906

    See also- Smith v. Pinch, 80 Mich. 332 , 45 N. W. 183 ; Bragaw v. Supreme Lodge, K. L. of H. 128 N. C. 354 . 54 L. R. A. 602, 38 S. … W. v. McKinstry, 67 Mo.. App. 82, illustrates this point.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boise Cascade Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    860 F.2d 471 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1988

    Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB, 441 U.S. 488, 495-97 , 99 S.Ct. 1842, 1848-49 , 60 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979); Allied Chemical and Alkali Workers v. … V Three production unions, which have no members who are maintenance employees, assert that the Board erred in dismissing the complaint insofar as it relates to them. 18 The Board dismissed the union’s petition for review

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kwik Care Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board

    82 F.3d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1996

    Krehbiel Co. v. NLRB, 844 F.2d 880, 882 (D.C.Cir.1988); J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 571 F.2d 850, 854 (5 Cir.1978); Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. NLRB, 424 F.2d 818 , 827 (D.C.Cir.1970). … See, e.g., NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    502 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 1974

    We conclude that the findings on which the Board rests its decision are adequately supported and that the result reached is a reasonable one. V. … National Aviation Trades Ass’n v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Enloe Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

    219 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

    Enloe seeks review of the Board’s order, arguing inter alia that the Board improperly failed to draw adverse inferences from the General Counsel’s refusal to make available for testimony the Board agents who supervised the … While the testimony of Board agents may be mandated when their participation is central to the case, see Drukker Commc’ns, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Local Union No. 636 v. National Labor Relations Board

    430 F.2d 906 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 1970

    Manufacturers Ass'n v. … See also Danielson v. Painters District Council No. 20, etc., S.D.N.Y., 305 F.Supp. 1108, 1113-1117 (1969); Rotenberg v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • F.W. Woolworth Co. v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    579 A.2d 713 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1990

    Woolworth appealed this decision to the Board. The Board heard arguments from both parties. … Mannan v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Keokuk Junction Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

    292 F.3d 884 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2002

    Argued May 14, 2002 Decided June 14, 2002 No. 01-1305 Keokuk Junction Railway Co., Petitioner v. … We grant the petition because the BNSF has not received from the Board the certificate without which the Board lacks authority to order a crossing. I.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marquez Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    650 F. App'x 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2016

    Again, petitioner never presented this issue to the Board. Relying on our decision in SSC Mystic Operating Co. v. NLRB, 801 F.3d 302, 308 (D.C. … In SW General, Inc. v. NLRB, 796 F.3d 67, 82 (D.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    519 F.2d 944 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 22, 1975

    Aug. 23, 1958, 72 Stat. 740 .) .See United States v. … Y. v. FPC (Texas Gulf Coast Area Rate Cases), 159 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 208-09 , 487 F.2d 1043, 1079-80 (1973), vacated and remanded sub nom. Shell Oil Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    208 F.3d 229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 2000

    (citing NLRB v. … See, e. g., NLRB v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Washington Ethical Society v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    421 A.2d 14 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1980

    Palmer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535, 538 (1972). The Board’s findings are “[generalized, conclusory (and) incomplete.” Dietrich v. … See, e. g., Goldstein v. Zoning Board of Review, City of Warwick, 101 R.I. 728 , 227 A.2d 195 (R.I.1967).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re Tinsley

    668 A.2d 833 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1995

    Brown testified that he knew very little about the matters leading up to Petitioner’s discipline. … See In re: Brown, 649 A.2d 835 (D.C.1994) and Matter of McConnell, (Board Op., Oct. 25, 1994) (Bar Docket No. 495-93)

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    330 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 1971

    See First National Bank of McKeesport v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n of Homestead, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 194 , 225 F.2d 33 (1955); Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. … Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Rowe, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 140, 144 , 284 F.2d 274, 278 (1960). See also First National Bank of McKeesport v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    838 F.3d 16 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 30, 2016

    BROWN, Circuit Judge: Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC (“Heartland”) successfully petitioned this Court to review an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board” or “NLRB”). … Corp. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • In Re Clyman

    713 A.2d 313 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1998

    The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) now recommends that Mr. Clyman be reinstated, and Bar Counsel does not object. We adopt the Board’s recommendation and order Mr. … In re Brown, 617 A2d 194, 197 (D.C.1992); In re Roundtree, 503 A.2d 1215,1216-1217 (D.C. 1985).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.