Case law

Pickens v. Brown

147 S.W.3d 89 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2004

Smith v. White, 114 S.W.3d 407, 421 (Mo.App.2003); Lombardo v. Lombardo, 35 S.W.3d 386, 390-91 (Mo.App.2000). … Perry v. Perry, 114 S.W.3d 865, 868 (Mo.App.2003).

Brown v. State

512 S.W.2d 404 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1974

Young v. State, 473 S.W.2d 390 (Mo.1971). … O’Neal v. State, 486 S.W.2d 206 (Mo.1972) ; Sallee v. State, 460 S.W.2d 554 (Mo.1970).

State v. Brown

364 Mo. 759 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1954

Warren (of Warren and Jones) dated June 5, 1952, payable to Ray Brown (defendant), for $1000. … Defendant cites People v.

Brown v. State

561 S.W.3d 491 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 2018

Eddie Brown appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

Shackleford v. Brown

89 Mo. 546 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1886

On the authority of the cases of Walters v. Ford, 74 Mo. 198 , and McCord v. McCord, 77 Mo, 166, the judgment in this case is hereby affirmed.

State v. Brown

744 S.W.2d 809 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1988

Brown, 716 S.W.2d 436 (Mo.App.1986) [hereinafter Brown II; this Court’s decision in State v. Brown, 708 S.W.2d 140 (Mo. banc 1986) will be referred to as Brown /]. … The facts concerning the Weaubleau burglary are set out in the companion cases of State v. Brown, 708 S.W.2d 140 (Mo. banc 1986) and State v. Brown, 716 S.W.2d 436 (Mo.App.1986). 2 .

State v. Brown

604 S.W.2d 10 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1980

State v. … State v. Lynch, 528 S.W.2d 454 (Mo.App.1975); State v. Dunn, 577 S.W.2d 649 (Mo. banc 1979).

Kueffer v. Brown

879 S.W.2d 658 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1994

Plaintiffs contend that Brown had no specialized competence in this area and that lay witnesses may not offer opinions in areas requiring specialized knowledge, citing Kennedy v. … Union Electric Co. of Missouri, 358 Mo. 504 , 216 S.W.2d 756 (Mo.1948) and Grace v. Union Electric Co., 239 Mo.App. 1210 , 200 S.W.2d 364 (Mo.App.1947). No objection was made to Brown’s testimony at trial.

Stewart v. Brown

112 Mo. 171 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1892

Brown in one year after the date thereof. Stewart died in April, 1885, and the trustee sold the property on the twenty-second ■ day of February, 1886, and Brown became the purchaser at the price of $1,985. … Beatie v. Butler, 21 Mo. 313 ; Powers v. Kueckhoff, 41 Mo. 431 ; Hornby v. Cramer, 12 How. Pr. (N. Y.) 490; Ingle v. Jones, 43 Iowa, 286 ; Golcher v. Brisbin, 20 Minn. 453 ; Johnson v.

Brown v. Harris

52 Mo. 306 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1873

and collecting the taxes and assessments authorized by this Act; and such taxes and assessments shall be a lien upon and against the property so taxed and assessed, until the same shall be paid off and satisfied. “ Said Board … The law then plainly is, that the School Board shall certify to the Clerk of the County Court the rate of tax levied, with the names of the persons residing or owning property within, the district, and it is the Clerk’s duty

Clark v. Brown

22 Mo. 140 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1855

But the difficulty is that, so far as Brown, the contractor, is concerned, this is a part of the case in which he has no interest, and the owners, the only parties really interested in it, make no objection. … one against the building only, and not against the property or person of Brown, and can not affect his interest in any particular, that we can see.

Brown v. Bibb

356 Mo. 148 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1947

Appellants Brown and Smith are grandchildren, and appellant Norvell is a great grandchild, of Joseph H. and Maria Roberts. … Brown and Ellen Smith, plaintiff-appellants. Maggie’s heirs are defendants, Russell Temple, Agnes Louney and Bobby Norvell.

State v. Brown

317 Mo. 361 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 3, 1927

Several witnesses testified to seeing the sheriff pursue Brown, Brown pass into the field, and to the tracing of Brown’s car by the tracks it made to the place where the whisky wás found. … [State v. Young, 266 Mo. l. c. 732; State v. Cannon, 232 Mo. l. c. 212; *366 State v. Carragin, 210 Mo. 351 ; State v. Winer, 263 Mo. 356 ; State v. Christian, 253 Mo. l. c. 396.]

Brown v. Donham

900 S.W.2d 630 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 20, 1995

V, § 10. II. The parties assert various procedural errors. Ms. Brown argues that Ms. … Cottonseed Delinting Corp. v. Roberts Brothers, Inc., 218 S.W.2d 592 , 594 (Mo.1949); Thacker v. Massman Const.

Brown v. State

925 S.W.2d 216 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1996

In Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 [1] (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied, sub nom. Walker v. … V, § 2 (1945); State v. Simpson, 813 S.W.2d 323, 323 [2] (Mo.App.S.D.1991), cer t. denied, 502 U.S. 1109 , 112 S.Ct. 1209 , 117 L.Ed.2d 448 (1992).

Brown v. Simmons

335 S.W.3d 481 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2010

The first case was Brown v. Simmons, 270 S.W.3d 508 (Mo.App. S.D.2008) (“Brown I ”). We borrow freely from that opinion without further attribution. … Johnson v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 92 S.W.3d 107, 112 (Mo.App. W.D.2003). Here, an essential element for application of res judicata is missing.

Gantt v. Brown

244 Mo. 271 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 26, 1912

McCrary cites Mann v. Cassidy, 1 Brewst. 43; People v. Holden, 28 Cal. 139 ; Kneass’s Case, 2 Pars. (Pa.), 570; and Collings’s Case, Bright. Elec. Cases, 513. In the case of Mann v. … All concur except Kennish and Brown, JJ., not sitting.

State v. Brown

476 S.W.2d 519 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 22, 1972

See Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S. Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 , and State v. … In Burgett v.

Pool v. Brown

98 Mo. 675 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Prior v. Scott, 87 Mo. 303 . … Henry v. Atkison, 50 Mo. 266 . IY.

State v. Brown

436 S.W.2d 724 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1969

However, the trial court did not comply with our order which cited State v. Stid-ham, supra, or with Rule 27.26 as amended. … And as said in Gerberding v.