Resp. Ex. J, ECF No. 9-10
How later courts described this case
- Resp. Ex. J, ECF No. 9-10
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PER CURIAM.
Eddie Brown appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).