Case law

Affolder v. New York, C. & St. LR Co.

79 F. Supp. 365 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 1948

He had almost reached the car which he intended to board at the time of his fall. … Co. v. Brown, 6 Cir., 1933, 63 F.2d 657, 658 , where judgment for plaintiff was affirmed. In the Brown case the suit was brought under the Safety Appliance Act. Plaintiff was a brakeman employed by the defendant.

Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Walker

40 Mo. 383 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

As between the parties, a patent upon a confirmation by the old board relates back to the filing of the claim as the inception of the title—Landes v. Brant, 10 How. (U. S.) 343. … The subsequent legislation, according to the decision in Menard’s Heirs v. Massey, 8 How. (U. S.) 293, and in Cabanné v. Walker, 31 Mo. 274 , and Papin v.

North Kansas City Hospital Board of Trustees v. St. Luke's Northland Hospital

984 S.W.2d 113 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1998

Both the trial court and the Board rely heavily on Tribune Publishing Co. v. Curators of the Univ. of Missouri, 661 S.W.2d 575 (Mo.App. … Tipton v. Barton, 747 S.W.2d 325, 329 (Mo.App. E.D.1988).

Rasse v. City of Marshall Municipal Utilities, Board of Public Works

136 S.W.3d 546 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2004

Louis Rasse appeals the Board of Public Works’ decision affirming the City of Marshall Municipal Utilities’ assessment of wastewater treatment service charges against him for sewer usage at his residence. We affirm.

HHC Medical Group, P.C. v. City of Creve Coeur Board of Adjustment

99 S.W.3d 68 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2003

and 536.110 and Wolfner v. … The Board also cross-appeals from the judgment. Standard of Review We review the decision of the Board, not the judgment of the trial court. Missouri Title Loans, Inc. v. City of St.

State ex rel. Barker v. Scott

270 Mo. 146 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 20, 1917

[State ex rel. v. Lounsberry, 125 Mo. 157, 1 . c. 163.] … PER CURIAM: — The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.

State v. Rankin

477 S.W.2d 72 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1972

When Brown stepped out of the Chevrolet Officer Hoffecker observed what appeared to be a weapon lying on the floor board of the front seat of the Chevrolet. … State v. Owens, 302 Mo. 348 , 259 S.W. 100 ; State v. Cuezze, Mo.Sup., 249 S.W.2d 373 ; State v. McBride, 327 Mo. 184 , 37 S.W.2d 423 ; State v. Morice, Mo.Sup., 79 S.W.2d 741 ; State v.

Community Fire Protection District of St. Louis County v. Board of Education

312 S.W.2d 75 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1958

Volker v. Kirby, 345 Mo. 801 , 136 S.W.2d 319 [5]; Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. Brandstetter, supra [4]; State ex rel. Thompson v. Roberts, Mo.Sup., 264 S.W.2d 314 [2]. … Young v. Brassfield, Mo.Sup., 223 S.W.2d 491 [1]; Cohen v. Ennis, Mo.Sup., 308 S.W.2d 669 [3], 672.

State Ex Rel. Claudia Lee & Associates, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

297 S.W.3d 107 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2009

Standard of Review When reviewing a Board decision on the merits, this court independently reviews the decision of the Board and not the judgment of the trial court. State ex. rel. Teefey v. … Lee argues that the issue cannot be mooted by the passage, after the Board’s decision, of a new zoning ordinance. Lee says Eubanks v.

Opinion No. 8-79 (1979)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 8, 1979

Board of Education of Borough of Rutherford, 100 A.2d 857 (N.J. 1953); Brown v. Orange County Board of Public Instruction, 128 So.2d 181 (Fla.Ct.App. 1960); Goodwin v. Cross County School District No. 7, 394 F. … Supp. 417 (D.C.Ark. 1973); Heltzer v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County, Florida, 548 F.2d 559 (5th Cir. 1977).

Kein v. School District

42 Mo. App. 460 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1890

Luthy v. Woods, 1 Mo. App. 167 , was . where the board of directors of the St. … In Dodd, Brown & Co. v. Levy, 10 Mo. App. 121 , Judge Thompson' on referring to the case of Luthy v.

Newberry v. Durand

87 Mo. App. 290 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1901

Franklin v. Board of Education, 75 Mo. 408 ; Ins. Co. v. Seminary, 52 Mo. 480 . … Deutman v. Kilpatrick, 46 Mo. App. 624 ; Michael v. Ins. Co., 17 Mo. App. 23 ; Gaslight Co. v. St. Louis, 46 Mo. 121 ; Norton v. Bohart, 105 Mo. 615 .

Deevers v. Lands

220 Mo. App. 50 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1926

[Smiths’ v. McConathy, 11 Mo. 517 ; Baker v. McDaniel, 178 Mo. 447 , 77 S. W. 531 .] The corruption of the atmosphere. … [McCracken v. Swift & Co. (Mo. App.), 250 S. W. 953 .] In the case of Bielman v. Rys. Co., 50 Mo.

Tuffli v. Board of Education of the Wentzville R-4 School District

603 S.W.2d 77 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1980

That statute gives a teacher the right to appeal the school board’s decision “to the circuit court of the county where the employing school. district is located”. … State Tax Commission v. Luten, 459 S.W.2d 375 [1] (Mo.banc 1970). A specific statute prevails over a general one. State, etc. v. Dickherber, 576 S.W.2d 532 [1] (Mo. banc 1979).

State ex rel. Ziegenhein v. Spencer

114 Mo. 574 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1893

Wickham v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Laughlin v. Fairbanks, 8 Mo. 370 ; Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 ; George v. Middough, 62 Mo. 549 ; State ex rel. v. Board, 18 S. W. Rep. 782 . … Abbott v. Lindenbower, 42 Mo. 162 ; State v. Board, supra.

State ex rel. Tucker v. McDonald

793 S.W.2d 616 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1990

Behrens v. Ebenrech, 784 S.W.2d 827, 828 (Mo.App.1990). … Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 853 (Mo.App.1964). Here, Tucker demonstrated unique circumstances not common to all property owners in the neighborhood.

In re Sanford

236 Mo. 665 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1911

In concurring in the very able opinion of my brother Woodson, I deem it proper to say that I do not understand the opinion as holding’ that the board of equalization is a court, or that it derives its authority to commit … Woodson, Graves, Kennish and Brown, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. Hendrickson

393 S.W.2d 481 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 20, 1965

Hendrickson, the Clerk of the Village of Lone Jack, who is also a member of the Board of Trustees, and the other members of the Board of Trustees, Richard V. Brown, Rick Carrico, James S. Parker, and Don Muncy. … Elmhurst-Chicago Stone Co., 18 Ill.2d 479 , 165 N.E.2d 310 ; Board of County Commissioners of County of Sarpy v. Petsch, 172 Neb. 263 , 109 N.W.2d 388 1 . c. 390, 391(1) (2) (3, 4); Daoud v.

Stanley v. Missouri State Board of Law Examiners

616 F. Supp. 142 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 3, 1985

The Piper Decision This case is controlled by the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. … See Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90 , 101 S.Ct. 411 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980); Southern Jam, Inc. v. Robinson, 675 F.2d 94 (5th Cir. 1982); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1738 ; Restatement, Second, Judgments § 86 (1982).

Anderson v. Public Schools

26 L.R.A. 707 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1894

“Plans and specifications can be seen at the office of Furlong & Brown, the architects, room 38, southeast corner of Broadway and Olive street. *65 “The board reserves the right to reject any or all bids. 0. L. … The facts in judgment are wholly unlike those considered in McNeil v. Boston Chamber of Commerce (1891), 154 Mass. 277 , cited on behalf of the plaintiffs.