Case law

Carey v. Osgood

18 Me. 152 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1841

Slasson v. Brown et al. 20 Pick. 437 , has been cited as an opposing authority. That depended upon the revised law of Massachusetts, c. 98, for the relief of poor prisoners. … It does not therefore conflict with Agry v. Betts, the statute of Massachusetts not containing the provision, which was the ground of that decision.

Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland

499 A.2d 145 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 11, 1985

The history of litigation between these parties has been described in Your Home III, Waxler v. City of Portland, 454 A.2d 344 (Me.1983) (Mem.), Your Home, Inc. v. … City of Portland, 432 A.2d 1250 (Me.1981) (Your Home II) and Your Homes, Inc. v.

Berry v. Reed

53 Me. 487 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

Rochester v. Chester, 3 N. H., 349; Peterboro’ v. Jaffrey, 6 N. H., 462; Beard v. Kirk, 11 N. H., 397. … Thus, in Robinson v.

Fryeburg Trust v. Town of Fryeburg

151 A.3d 933 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 1, 2016

Rossignol v. Me. Pub. Employees Ret. Sys., 2016 ME 115, ¶ 6, 144 A.3d 1175; Mills v. Town of Eliot, 2008 ME 134, ¶¶ 13-16, 955 A.2d 258. Here, because the Board of Appeals 4 marks omitted). … .”); Underwood v.

Wone v. City of Portland

466 A.2d 1256 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 20, 1983

The Board previously has decided similar questions regarding the status of the parties. See City of Bangor v. … Appellant states that he “approached” the Board and was told that he was not within its purview due to his classification but nowhere in the record does this appear. . See Bar Harbor Banking & Trust Co. v.

Boisvert v. Reed

692 A.2d 921 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 7, 1997

See 618 A.2d at 213 ; Keating v. … Gagne v.

Eaton v. Waite

66 Me. 221 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 11, 1877

Leavitt v. Savage, 16 Maine, 72, 73. Page v. Webster, 15 Maine, 249, 256. Frye v. Barker, 4 Pick. 382 . Halsted v. Brown, 17 Ind. 202 .

Dean v. W. S. Given Co.

123 Me. 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 1923

Dyer v. Libby, 61 Maine, 45. Also see Edwards v. Brown, *93 98 Maine, 165. … Marsh v. Hyde, 3 Gray, 331 . See, supporting that idea, Thompson v. Alger, 12 Met., 428 ; Browne, Statute of Frauds, Sec. 343; Williston on Contracts, Sec. 566; Dallavo v. Richardson, (Mich.), 96 N. W., 20 .

Knight v. Burnham

90 Me. 294 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 27, 1897

Plaintiff claims to recover the price of boards sold by him to defendant by the thousand feet. Defense that the boards were not surveyed by a sworn surveyor, before delivery as *295 required by R. S., c. 41, § 15. … Richmond v. Foss, 77 Maine, 590. Plaintiff replies that he surveyed the boards, and that he was a legal surveyor of lumber.

Campbell v. Eveleth

83 Me. 50 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 3, 1890

Hull v. Hall, 78 Maine, 114. … Kane v. Northern Centr. R. R. Co. 128 U. S. 91 . Guthrie v. Me. Centr. R. R. Co, 81 Maine, 572.

Town of Vienna v. Kokernak

612 A.2d 870 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 28, 1992

See Marxsen v. Board of Directors, Maine School Admin. Dist. No. 5, 591 A.2d 867, 872 (Me.1991). … See Fichter v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 604 A.2d 433, 437 (Me.1992). In the instant case the procedure that was used allowed both parties to present their positions.

Dishon v. Maine State Retirement System

569 A.2d 1216 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 8, 1990

Beaulieu v. City of Lewiston, 440 A.2d 334, 338 (Me.1982); see also Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221, 230, 238-39 , 101 S.Ct. 1074, 1080, 1084-85 , 67 L.Ed.2d 186 (1981). … McNicholas v. York Beach Village Corp., 394 A.2d 264, 269 (Me.1978).

Garing v. Fraser

76 Me. 37 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 23, 1884

Dunlap v. Glidden, 31 Maine, 435, 439; Severance v. Judkins, 73 Maine, 379 ; Damport v. Sympson, Cro. Eliz. 520; Eyres v. Sedgwicke, Cro. Jac. 601; Phelps v. Stearns, 4 Gray, 106 ; Rice v. … Parker v. Huntington, 2 Gray, 128 ; Brown v. Lakeman, 12 Cush. 482 and cases there cited; Parker v. Farley, 10 Cush. 279 . And even if we adopt the suggestions as to the inflexibility of the rule of Ch. Jus.

Thompson v. Consolidated Constructors

677 A.2d 554 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1996

We conclude that the Board, pursuant to Beaulieu v. … Gurney v. Commercial Welding Co., Me. W.C.C.App.Div. 733, 735 (Me.1992); Milles v. Carl Thompson, Jr., Me. W.C.C.App.Div. 4152, 4155-56 (Me.1990). See also Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr.

State v. Cook

2 A.3d 333 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 24, 2010

State v. Cook, 2010 ME 81, ¶ 2 , 2 A.3d 313, 314 ; accord State v. Schmidt, 2008 ME 151, ¶2 , 957 A.2d 80, 83 . … See State v.

Perkins

141 Me. 137 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 18, 1944

Gilman, supra, but, expressly, that it is important whether the wife has contributed to the acquisition of the estate, Brown et al. v. Hodgdon, 31 Me., 65. … It has been declared with some frequency in this Court that each case involving an allowance under our statute should be determined upon its own particular facts, Brown v. Hodgdon, supra; Kersey v.

Roe v. Yarmouth Lumber, Inc.

785 A.2d 334 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 20, 2001

See Holt v. S.A.D. No. 6, 2001 ME 146, ¶5 , 782 A.2d 779 . … Bourassa v. Town of Farmington, W.C.C. 98-01 (March 3, 1998). .

Richardson v. Maine Employment Security Commission

229 A.2d 326 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 17, 1967

Category B: Ball Brothers Company, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division (1963), 135 Ind.App. 68 , 189 N.E.2d 429 , no compensation. Fahl et al. v. … Board of Review, Bureau of Unemployment Compensation (June 1965), 2 Ohio App.2d 286 , 207 N. E.2d 774 , remanded to the Board of Review due to insufficiency of the record. Marcum v. Ohio Match Co. et al.

State v. Prior

662 A.2d 225 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 1995

The officer testified that there were four Coast Guard reports concerning the incident: a Boarding Report, a situation report, a Supplemental Boarding Report, and a dispatcher’s log. … See Libby v. Concord General Mut. Ins. Co., 452 A.2d 979 (Me.1982). The record contains no evidence demonstrating either an express, implied, or apparent agency relationship.

Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of Kittery

219 A.2d 728 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 16, 1966

Addington v. Board of County Commissioners, 191 Kan. 528 , 382 P.2d 315 (1963). … Board of Property Ass., App. & Rev., 417 Pa. 213 , 209 A.2d 397 (1965); McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment, A. & R., 417 Pa. 234 , 209 A.2d 389 , (1965); Sears, Roebuck & Company v.