Case law

Oklahoma Employers Safety Group v. Colbert Nursing Home, Inc.

954 P.2d 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1997

In support of its contention, Colbert relies on Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. Cimarron Exploration Co., 564 F.Supp. 840 (W.D.Okla.1981); Miller v. Young, 197 Okla. 503 , 172 P.2d 994 (1946); and Houser v. … Here, there is no showing that the failure of the membership to elect the board damaged Colbert.

Savage v. State

304 P.2d 344 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1956

See cases cited in Beasley v. State, Okl.Cr., 282 P.2d 249, 251 ; and generally see 86 A.L.R. pp. 264, 269; 15 Am.Jur. p. 24, § 335; Warren v. State, 1926, 35 Okl.Cr. 430 , 251 P. 101 ; Rider v. … Landon v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 336 , 166 P.2d 781 ; Ratcliff v. State, Okl.Cr., 289 P.2d 152 ; Coats v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 217 , 212 P.2d 141 , 214 P.2d 455 .

State Ex Rel. Woolridge v. Board of Education

35 Okla. 93 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1912

This act was sustained by this court in Cotteral et al. v. Barker et al., 34 Okla. 533 , 126 Pac. 211 . … Laws 1909, p. 239; Erwin v. Wheeler, 31 Okla. 331, 120 Pac. 1098 . We conclude that the school board is not liable for the expenses of holding this election, but that the city is.

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jefferson County Excise Board

182 Okla. 458 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1938

Grable v. Childers, State Auditor, 176 Okla. 360 , 56 P.2d 357 . The unmistakable object and intent of the legislation herein considered, and which we have considered in the case of Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. … Tulsa County Excise Board, No. 28356, decided April 5, 1938, (not yet released for publication), is to promote higher efficiency and more nearly uniform educational facilities among the several school districts throughout

Rose v. Independent School Board No. 3, Buffalo Valley, Latimer County

367 P.2d 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1961

In support of this argument, they cite the case of Hollarn v. … No. 116 etc. v. Wolf, 78 Kan. 805 , 98 P. 237, 239 , 20 L.R.A.,N.S., 358) ; and we think it is controlling here.

Tonini v. Board of Com'rs of Comanche County

150 Okla. 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1931

Tonini against the board of county commissioners of that county to recover money paid for the purchase of a tax sale certificate. For authority to maintain the action, plaintiff relies on section 9739, C. O. … Clark v. Board of Com’rs of Cimarron County, 143 Okla. 18 , 285 Pac. 127 . Fullerton v. State ex rel. Com’rs of Land Office, 140 Okla. 122 , 282 Pac. 674 . Hammond v. State ex rel.

Nordam v. Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

63 O.B.A.J. 719 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1992

The sole issue presented is whether an order of the Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission remanding a claim to the Commission’s Appeal Tribunal for further evidence is a final order subject to judicial … Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 695 P.2d 498, 501-02 (Okla.1984).

Dusbabek v. Board of Com'rs of Blaine County

188 Okla. 602 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1941

. § 1143), as well as the cases of Winters v. Birch, 169 Okla. 237 , 36 P. 2d 907 , and Gentry et al. v. McCurry et al., 134 Okla. 182 , 273 P. 222 . … CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur.

Buffington, Board of County Com'rs v. State Barnard

52 Okla. 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1915

Semke, constituting the board of county commissioners of Garfield county. … It is apparent that the only question involved in this proceeding has been settled by Sullins et al v. State ex rel. Barnard et al., 33 Okla. 526 , 126 Pac. 731 , and Board of Commissioners of Seminole County v.

Opinion No. 75-147 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 15, 1975

It is a well-settled rule of statutory construction that a statute with a possible ambiguity must be interpreted in the most reasonable way, not in a way that would lead to unreasonable or absurd consequences, Brown v. … State Election Board, Okl., 170 P.2d 200 (1946).

Okmulgee County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

309 P.2d 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1957

And, in Jefferson County Excise Board v. … Co. v. Harper County Excise Board, 191 Okl. 103 , 127 P.2d 170 , and Excise Board of Blaine County, v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 180 Okl. 626, 71 P.2d 608 .

Walter Realty Co. v. Jones

35 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1913

Rathbone v. Sterling, 25 Kan. 444 . The case of King v. … In'support of this proposition Rathbone v. Sterling, 25 Kan. 444, Brown v. Parker, 2 Okla. 258 , 39 Pac. 567 , and Biddick v. Kobler, 110 Cal. 191 , 42 Pac. 578 , are cited.

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. National Bank of Tulsa

388 P.2d 497 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1963

In the case of Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. … The Iowa case of Baker v.

Elliott v. Trisler

66 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1917

Trisler testified that Axie Brown dedicated the road in 1907, but he does not testify as to what she did that constituted a dedication of this road. … Board of Commissioners of Woodward County v. Thyfault, 43 Okla. 82 , 141 Pac. 409 ; White et al. v. Dowell, 49 Okla. 589 , 153 Pac. 1140 ; Britton v. Morris, 59 Okla. 162 , 158 Pac. 358 .

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam Authority

720 P.2d 713 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1986

720 P.2d 713 (1986) WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Appellant, v. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY, Brown Boveri Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Benham-Holway Power Group, Appellees. … In Skouby v.

Smith v. Farmers Cooperative Ass'n of Butler

63 O.B.A.J. 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1992

In Burk v. … Mitchell states that it was always Baker who brought up the subject of firing Smith at board meetings. In Thompson v.

In Re Incorporation of Town of Big Cabin

132 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1928

Appellants also rely upon the case of Town of Enterprise v. … Kimberlin v. Board of County Com’rs, 78 Okla. 143 , 180 Pac. 361 ; Goar v. Brown, 82 Okla. 227 , 200 Pac. 156 ; Dunagan v. Red Rock, 58 Okla. 218 , 158 Pac. 1170 ; Cobb v. Berry, 67 Okla. 29 , 168 Pac. 46 .

Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County

192 Okla. 382 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1943

As held in Gooldy v. … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., absent.

Wright v. State

617 P.2d 1354 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1979

Brown v. State, 52 Okl.Cr. 307 , 4 P.2d 129 (1931). In closing argument, reasonable inferences may be drawn. … In Haughey v.

Board of Com'rs of Grady County v. Broadwell

75 Okla. 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1918

The board of commissioners rejected the claim, from which decision an appeal was prosecuted to the district court, where judgment was rendered in favor of defendants in error, and the board of county commissioners prosecutes … The questions of fact and the propositions of law involved are identical with those in the case of Board of Commissioners v. Ward, 68 Okahoma, 173 Pac. 1050 , and Broadwell v.