Case law

United Unions, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

554 A.2d 313 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1989

Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 287 A.2d 535, 539 (D.C.1972) (citations omitted). … Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 320 A.2d 282, 286 (D.C.1974); Taylor v.

Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Civil Aeronautics Board

502 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 1974

We conclude that the findings on which the Board rests its decision are adequately supported and that the result reached is a reasonable one. V. … National Aviation Trades Ass’n v.

Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 Etc. v. National Labor Relations Board. Textile Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board

487 F.2d 1099 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 1973

Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. NLRB, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 185 F.2d 732 (1950); Retail Clerks Union, Local No. 1179 v. NLRB, 376 F.2d 186 (9th Cir. 1967). … As the Court described the role of the Labor Board in Republic Aviation Corp. v.

Enloe Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

219 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

Enloe seeks review of the Board’s order, arguing inter alia that the Board improperly failed to draw adverse inferences from the General Counsel’s refusal to make available for testimony the Board agents who supervised the … While the testimony of Board agents may be mandated when their participation is central to the case, see Drukker Commc’ns, Inc. v.

Sunglass Products Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

165 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 2005

This cause was considered on a petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board” or “NLRB”) and was briefed and argued by counsel. … It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by this Court, that the petition for review is hereby denied, and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement is granted substantially for the reasons given by the Board in the decision under

International Typographical Union v. National Labor Relations Board

371 F.2d 347 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1966

The petitioning employer in No. 20,105 complains of the Board’s determinations that it has violated Section 8(a) (1) and (5); and in this latter ease the Board has cross-petitioned for enforcement. … Our scrutiny of the whole record affords us no warrant for interfering with any of the Board’s conclusions. See Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

Grondorf, Field, Black & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

107 F.3d 882 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 1997

Workers v. NLRB, 980 F.2d 774 , 778 n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1992) (findings not challenged before the Board are entitled to summary enforcement). … Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp. v. NLRB, 942 F.2d 151 , 160 (2d Cir.1991); see NLRB v. Katz’s Delicatessen, 80 F.3d 755 (2d Cir.1996); Ron Tirapelli Ford, Inc. v. NLRB, 987 F.2d 433 (7th Cir. 1993).

Berry v. McCarthy

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LYNN BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 374 (1998) (cleaned up). As a military review board, the ABCMR is entitled to even greater deference than civilian administrative agencies. Coe v.

Garvey v. National Transportation Safety Board

190 F.3d 571 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1999

Martin v. … It is also the position the FAA has consistently taken in litigation before the Board. See Administrator v. Gentile, S N.T.S.B. 60, 64 (1988); Administrator v. Wells, 1 N.T.S.B. 1472 , 1474 (1971).

Facchina Constraction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

180 F. App'x 178 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 2006

. & Furniture Workers v. NLRB, 41 F.3d 1532 , 1536 (D.C.Cir.1994). … ‘We owe substantial deference to inferences drawn from the facts, to choices of remedies, and, overall, to the reasoned exercise of the Board’s expert judgment.” Avecor, Inc. v.

EPI Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

324 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 2009

See NLRB v. … Pacific Micronesia Corp. v.

Palace Sports & Entertainment, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

411 F.3d 212 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 2005

In evaluating this disciplinary action, the Board relied on the framework approved in NLRB v. … The Board ostensibly employed the framework set forth in Wright Line v.

The Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

350 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 5, 1965

C. v. Baltimore & O. Ry., 145 U.S. 263 , 281, 12 S.Ct. 844 , 36 L.Ed. 699 (1892). … Ry. v. Tennessee, 262 U.S. 318 , 43 S.Ct. 583 , 67 L.Ed. 999 (1923).

Nordstrom v. National Labor Relations Board.

984 F.2d 479 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 1993

NLRB v. Brown & Root, 311 F.2d 447, 454 (8th Cir.1963). … See NLRB v.

Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

519 F.2d 944 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 22, 1975

Aug. 23, 1958, 72 Stat. 740 .) .See United States v. … Y. v. FPC (Texas Gulf Coast Area Rate Cases), 159 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 208-09 , 487 F.2d 1043, 1079-80 (1973), vacated and remanded sub nom. Shell Oil Co. v.

Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

208 F.3d 229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 2000

(citing NLRB v. … See, e. g., NLRB v.

Kevin v. Reynolds v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Canon Business Solutions and Broadspire Insurance Co.

86 A.3d 1157 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 2014

RUIZ, Senior Judge: Petitioner, Kevin V. Reynolds, petitions this court to review the April 18, 2012, Order of the Compensation Review Board (“CRB”) of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services. … ALJ Brown rejected Dr.

Washington Ethical Society v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

421 A.2d 14 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1980

Palmer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535, 538 (1972). The Board’s findings are “[generalized, conclusory (and) incomplete.” Dietrich v. … See, e. g., Goldstein v. Zoning Board of Review, City of Warwick, 101 R.I. 728 , 227 A.2d 195 (R.I.1967).

Hayes v. Chairman, United States Board of Parole

492 F.2d 669 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 4, 1974

492 F.2d 669 160 U.S.App.D.C. 403 Hayes v. Chairman, United States Board of Parole 73-1843 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 2/4/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board

29 F.3d 655 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1994

Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1718 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). 57 Unable to link its assertion of authority to any statutory provision, the Board's position in this case amounts to the bare suggestion that it possesses … National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943), and Leedom v.